Scientists plan their own march on Washington (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Musicmystery -> Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 5:56:35 AM)

"Although this will start with a march, we hope to use this as a starting point to take a stand for science in politics,” reads a statement on the website. "Slashing funding and restricting scientists from communicating their findings (from tax-funded research!) with the public is absurd and cannot be allowed to stand as policy.”

"This is a non-partisan issue that reaches far beyond people in the STEM fields and should concern anyone who values empirical research and science.”

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/316023-scientists-are-planning-their-own-march-on-washington

These are, without a doubt, the strangest times I've lived through.

People are literally at war with reality.





BoscoX -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 7:45:27 AM)

Yawn

Another organized political group yelling and screaming about losing their welfare bennies

President Trump is way overdue




mnottertail -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 7:49:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Yawn

Another organized political group yelling and screaming about losing their welfare bennies

President Trump is way overdue

No shit, nutsuckers need to lose their welfare bennies. Trump and all of them. No go tho




Musicmystery -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 7:55:45 AM)

The very fact that anyone would call scientists "a political group" show the sheer insanity of the situation we're in.




BoscoX -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 8:01:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The very fact that anyone would call scientists "a political group" show the sheer insanity of the situation we're in.


Now you can have an "adult conversation" with mnottertail [:D]




mnottertail -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 8:25:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The very fact that anyone would call scientists "a political group" show the sheer insanity of the situation we're in.


Now you can have an "adult conversation" with mnottertail [:D]

And you can continuously cockgargle and felchgobble your constant retarded nutsuckerisms. No change since you were in your moms basement in the compound last night with your sock and hand lotion.




Lucylastic -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 9:01:41 AM)

Dictionaries, Facts, and Truth are not the domain of just the liberal agenda...




WickedsDesire -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 9:57:47 AM)

I really forgot to do the Environmental- Whitehouse Nuthouse page didn't I type of thread..thinks! A new thread or this one...worth its own thread I feel




WhoreMods -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 10:11:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The very fact that anyone would call scientists "a political group" show the sheer insanity of the situation we're in.


Now you can have an "adult conversation" with mnottertail [:D]

If being excluded from adult conversations offends you, maybe you should start talking like an adult, rather than throwing a tantrum about it like a six year old.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 12:34:04 PM)


Ooooh! I get to "trot out" my scientific-y joke: Two moments walk (Grrrrr! GO. Moments don't "walk") into a bar and come out a couple!



Michael




Musicmystery -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 12:44:21 PM)

Somebody asked "What will happen in three years?"

I said, "What? Do you think I have 2020 vision?"




You matter. Unless you multiple yourself by the speed of light squared. Then you energy.






DaddySatyr -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 1:05:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Somebody asked "What will happen in three years?"

I said, "What? Do you think I have 2020 vision?"



You matter. Unless you multiple yourself by the speed of light squared. Then you energy.



I like the second one, better than the first, but I'm stealing both and putting them into my repertoire.



Michael




MrRodgers -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 1:38:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Yawn

Another organized political group yelling and screaming about losing their welfare bennies

President Trump is way overdue

Just where does the OP mention farmers, bankers and corporate America ?




Musicmystery -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 2:44:54 PM)

It has nothing to do with welfare. It has to do with gag orders and denial.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 5:58:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Somebody asked "What will happen in three years?"
I said, "What? Do you think I have 2020 vision?"

You matter. Unless you multiple yourself by the speed of light squared. Then you energy.


[:D] [:D] [:D]




Real0ne -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/28/2017 6:16:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The very fact that anyone would call scientists "a political group" show the sheer insanity of the situation we're in.



haha!

they are when they are sucking off the same teat




Kirata -> RE: Scientists plan their own march on Washington (1/29/2017 12:56:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

People are literally at war with reality.

I'll grant you that, but the question is which people. It's not really scientists as a class who are upset. It's the global warming alarmists. You know, the guys who have for decades been suppressing dissent in the spirit of honest inquiry.

EPA May Have Suppressed Report Skeptical Of Global Warming

Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty "decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."

Global warming research suppressed due to intolerance of scepticism, claims scientist

A climate change researcher has claimed that scientists are confusing their role as impartial observers with green activism after his paper challenging predictions about the speed of global warming was rejected because it was seen as “less than helpful.”

Not "helpful," what a hoot! And I could go on, and on, and on, and on.

K.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875