RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/4/2017 7:07:47 PM)

The false narrative is from the nutsuckers, Americans won, Nazi nutsuckers zero




vincentML -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/4/2017 8:22:14 PM)

quote:

We re-vamp our vetting process. Then, we throw open the doors, utilizing our new, extreme vetting.

How exactly does our "new extreme vetting" differ from the vetting currently in place, Michael? Details please.




DaddySatyr -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/4/2017 10:22:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

So sayith the guy who is still steaming about a post made a decade ago. Model of balance, you are.



Yeah. I was right. It's option 2.



Michael




Musicmystery -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 5:45:26 AM)

Of course Michael. You are always right. You've forgotten what constructing an argument means.

And it's too bad. You can make sense when you cool off long enough to dig in and think. I appreciate those moments.

But no, they aren't often these days. And apparently, that's not going to change. It's really a shame. There are enough Bozos.




Lucylastic -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 7:01:27 AM)


BREAKING NEWS
An appeals court has rejected the Trump administration's request to immediately reinstate its immigration order
Sunday, February 5, 2017 5:21 AM EST
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal appeals court early Sunday rejected a request by the Justice Department to immediately restore President Trump’s targeted travel ban, deepening a legal showdown over his authority to tighten the nation’s borders in the name of protecting Americans from terrorism.

In the legal back and forth over the travel ban, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco said a reply from the Trump administration was now due on Monday.

The ruling meant that travelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — as well as vetted refugees from all nations could, for now, continue to enter the country. Those foreigners had been barred by an executive order signed by the president on Jan. 27.

After a Federal District Court in Seattle blocked Mr. Trump’s order nationwide on Friday, the Justice Department appealed the ruling late Saturday, saying that the president had the constitutional authority to order the ban and that the court ruling “second-guesses the president’s national security judgment.”

On Saturday night, as Mr. Trump arrived at a Red Cross gala at Mar-a-Lago, his waterfront Florida resort, where he was spending the first getaway weekend of his presidency, reporters asked him if he was confident he would prevail in the government’s appeal. “We’ll win,” he replied. “For the safety of the country, we’ll win.

The legal maneuvering led Mr. Trump to lash out at Judge James Robart of the Federal District Court in Seattle throughout the day, prompting criticism that the president had failed to respect the judicial branch and its power to check on his authority.

In a Twitter post on Saturday, Mr. Trump wrote, “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!”

The Justice Department’s filing sought to have the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit block the Seattle judge’s decision and asked that the lower court’s ruling be stayed pending the appeal.

In its argument for an appeal, the Justice Department had said the president had an “unreviewable authority” to suspend the entry of any class of foreigners. It said the ruling by Judge Robart was too broad, “untethered” to the claims of the State of Washington, and in conflict with a ruling by another federal district judge, in Boston, who had upheld the order.

The Ninth Circuit court moved quickly to reject the administration’s appeal, a measure of the urgency and intense interest in the case.
more at the link

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/us/politics/visa-ban-trump-judge-james-robart.html?emc=edit_na_20170205&nl=breaking-news&nlid=69606674&ref=cta




mnottertail -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 7:20:51 AM)

Nutsuckers 0, Nutsuckers 0.




WickedsDesire -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 7:34:03 AM)

I agree vincentML but thought i would add my agreement into a new thread

http://www.collarchat.com/m_4997913/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4997913




Musicmystery -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 7:40:55 AM)

It's almost like the courts are looking to the constitution instead of listening to Trump.




Lucylastic -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 7:43:26 AM)

[image]http://i.imgur.com/245unae.jpg[/image]




BoscoX -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 8:08:58 AM)

Barack Obama had the worst record before the Supreme Court in modern history





mnottertail -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 8:27:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

<snip of typical nutsucker felchgbbling with no actual fact or citation>



You keep saying that like over half the cases werent originally brought by or against the W nutsucker administration, nor that the court was packed with nutsuckers. the nutsucker Il Douche will exceed his 8 year losses in less than a year though. the nutsucker Dlouchebagger is running 10x the lawsuits in the first week than any president in modern history.

Note that all your google hits are from refelches of nutsucker slobberblogs, and there are no facts and details on the cases, for instance, one of the things is where part of the case is upheld and part of it is denied, nutsuckers count that as a total loss.

Ah, but nutsuckers are innumerate so that sort of cockgargling is not suprising.




WhoreMods -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 9:46:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Whining mouthbreather can't use google to find a single page



FTFY




Musicmystery -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/5/2017 4:16:28 PM)

Whenever he can't defend Trump, he starts with "but Obama."

It's his way of admitting he's busted.




WhoreMods -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/6/2017 4:56:46 AM)

That seems to be a thing on here at the moment. I suppose dissing Obama is a lot easier than defending el presidente.




Musicmystery -> RE: President Trump 1 Alt Left ACLU 0 (2/6/2017 8:25:30 AM)

You can't defend the indefensible.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02