RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers

RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

longwayhome -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 10:39:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic only women have babies, of course its gynocentric you dumb fucking plonker And only men fucking pay for them. I find it ironic that women bitch about carrying a child for 9 months, but seem perfectly happy forcing a man to work his ass off to pay for their child for 18 years. The entitlement mentality is astounding. And it really can only be explained by misandry. Genuine hatred for men and a lack of empathy. You are a typical case in point. I really hate looking like I'm standing up for people in here because I don't want to be patronising and I'm sure they can stand up for themselves. However in this and subsequent posts you just seem to have taken your own negative, hateful stereotype of most women and overlaid it directly onto someone who said and suggested none of the things you have accused her of. You have absolutely no grounds for accusing anyone involved here of being a sponger but yet, as usual you incorrectly vilify your fellow posters so that you can spout bile at them for imagined wrongs. It's almost as if something or somebody entirely outwith this thread upset you and you turned up to rant at the people who happened to be around. I get it - you disagree, but being a total knob at the same time is not obligatory.

Edwird -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 10:39:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic only women have babies, of course its gynocentric you dumb fucking plonker And only men fucking pay for them. Oh good gosh, how out of touch with the world you are. So, what, women with kids who work full time spend all their money on cosmetics and gowns and furs, right? Let the men pay for the kid's food and clothes and soccer team fees. Any more good stories? Or rather comically bad stories, in your case.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 10:48:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: longwayhome quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic only women have babies, of course its gynocentric you dumb fucking plonker And only men fucking pay for them. I find it ironic that women bitch about carrying a child for 9 months, but seem perfectly happy forcing a man to work his ass off to pay for their child for 18 years. The entitlement mentality is astounding. And it really can only be explained by misandry. Genuine hatred for men and a lack of empathy. You are a typical case in point. I really hate looking like I'm standing up for people in here because I don't want to be patronising and I'm sure they can stand up for themselves. However in this and subsequent posts you just seem to have taken your own negative, hateful stereotype of most women and overlaid it directly onto someone who said and suggested none of the things you have accused her of. You have absolutely no grounds for accusing anyone involved here of being a sponger but yet, as usual you incorrectly vilify your fellow posters so that you can spout bile at them for imagined wrongs. It's almost as if something or somebody entirely outwith this thread upset you and you turned up to rant at the people who happened to be around. I get it - you disagree, but being a total knob at the same time is not obligatory. I most certainly can stand up for myself, however it is nice that Im not the only one who sees where he is bloviating and lying.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 10:50:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic only women have babies, of course its gynocentric you dumb fucking plonker And only men fucking pay for them. I find it ironic that women bitch about carrying a child for 9 months, but seem perfectly happy forcing a man to work his ass off to pay for their child for 18 years. The entitlement mentality is astounding. And it really can only be explained by misandry. Genuine hatred for men and a lack of empathy. You are a typical case in point. Could that be because, in MOST cases, it's the women left holding the baby by ignorant and unfaithful men?? It is right that they pay for their lack of respect for women. In cases where men actually get custody of their kids, the women pays maintenance/alimony just like those wastrel men.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 10:59:27 AM)
dear god, I read a piece in gizmodo this morning from another clueless male http://gizmodo.com/please-dont-glue-your-vagina-shut-during-your-period-1792723055 Its worth reading.

Edwird -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 11:03:42 AM)
quote: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers ORIGINAL: respectmen Women are the scourge of the earth, no question. I saved this one just for you, sweetheart: Ain`t That Just Like A Woman

longwayhome -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 11:20:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: longwayhome quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic only women have babies, of course its gynocentric you dumb fucking plonker And only men fucking pay for them. I find it ironic that women bitch about carrying a child for 9 months, but seem perfectly happy forcing a man to work his ass off to pay for their child for 18 years. The entitlement mentality is astounding. And it really can only be explained by misandry. Genuine hatred for men and a lack of empathy. You are a typical case in point. I really hate looking like I'm standing up for people in here because I don't want to be patronising and I'm sure they can stand up for themselves. However in this and subsequent posts you just seem to have taken your own negative, hateful stereotype of most women and overlaid it directly onto someone who said and suggested none of the things you have accused her of. You have absolutely no grounds for accusing anyone involved here of being a sponger but yet, as usual you incorrectly vilify your fellow posters so that you can spout bile at them for imagined wrongs. It's almost as if something or somebody entirely outwith this thread upset you and you turned up to rant at the people who happened to be around. I get it - you disagree, but being a total knob at the same time is not obligatory. I most certainly can stand up for myself, however it is nice that Im not the only one who sees where he is bloviating and lying. I know you can but, even though I try to be strong, every few months I can't take it any more and I have to call him out for behaving like a total knob. I am aware that I am using the words "total knob" in a lazy way but I do try to explain why in my posts. I'm now off to try to be a better person.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 11:33:01 AM)
I knew I should have put a smiley face in there[;)] A total knob works for me, hes not worth more effort... have fun...be a better person to yourself...it helps in so many ways:)

Awareness -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 11:38:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: longwayhome I really hate looking like I'm standing up for people in here because I don't want to be patronising and I'm sure they can stand up for themselves. Don't be stupid. You'd stand up for Charles Manson if his beliefs accorded with your own. Why, I have no idea. Your impulse to do so is stupid. quote: However in this and subsequent posts you just seem to have taken your own negative, hateful stereotype of most women and overlaid it directly onto someone who said and suggested none of the things you have accused her of. You have absolutely no grounds for accusing anyone involved here of being a sponger but yet, as usual you incorrectly vilify your fellow posters so that you can spout bile at them for imagined wrongs. Shut the fuck up, you whining bint. Who the fuck cares what you think? I certainly don't, so watching you play out your biological programming is nothing more than entertainment for me. quote: It's almost as if something or somebody entirely outwith this thread upset you and you turned up to rant at the people who happened to be around. Look! It thinks it's people! How cute! quote: I get it - you disagree, but being a total knob at the same time is not obligatory. Oh, I don't think you understand. You're kind of dense when it comes to reading people.

Awareness -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 11:41:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Could that be because, in MOST cases, it's the women left holding the baby by ignorant and unfaithful men?? Gee, when men have no choice in the baby whatsoever, I wonder why they don't feel particularly obligated. Perhaps it's because women treat them like an ATM. quote: It is right that they pay for their lack of respect for women. Lack of respect? You pathetic loser. Women do not deserve respect because they possess a vagina. How many fucking times have we tried to tell you this? Respect is earned, not granted to people on the basis of genitalia. quote: In cases where men actually get custody of their kids, the women pays maintenance/alimony just like those wastrel men. Actually, they don't. The percentage of deadbeat moms is WAY higher than deadbeat dads. And the majority of deadbeat dads are unable to pay child support because courts refuse to recognise their change in circumstances or income level. Facts. They're so inconvenient aren't they? Especially when they conflict with your idiotic and unfounded beliefs.

longwayhome -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 11:44:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I knew I should have put a smiley face in there[;)] A total knob works for me, hes not worth more effort... have fun...be a better person to yourself...it helps in so many ways:) No I knew the smiley face was there is spirit, but I do feel as if I have sunk to his level whenever I actually engage with Awareness. I know someone has to but it's just such a suck of life energy, engaging with his incessant pointless aggression.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 12:24:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Could that be because, in MOST cases, it's the women left holding the baby by ignorant and unfaithful men?? Gee, when men have no choice in the baby whatsoever, I wonder why they don't feel particularly obligated. Perhaps it's because women treat them like an ATM. And men treat women like free fuck machines and don't care if they get pregnant. It's a woman's body, so men don't get a choice in their aftermath of pussy-dipping. And that's also why they pay for the consequences... and rightly so. You damage the goods, you pay the penalty. quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: It is right that they pay for their lack of respect for women. Lack of respect? You pathetic loser. Women do not deserve respect because they possess a vagina. How many fucking times have we tried to tell you this? Respect is earned, not granted to people on the basis of genitalia. That's your spin on my words - I didn't say that. quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: In cases where men actually get custody of their kids, the women pays maintenance/alimony just like those wastrel men. Actually, they don't. Got a quote for that piece of bullshit?? Cuz every woman I know that lost custody of her kids to her partner has had to pay the same maintenance payments as if the boot were on the other foot. And in general, it's a percentage of your earnings. I should know, I had to pay for my mistake for 16 years. quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness The percentage of deadbeat moms is WAY higher than deadbeat dads. Got a legit cite for that bullshit?? quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness And the majority of deadbeat dads are unable to pay child support because courts refuse to recognise their change in circumstances or income level. Take it up with the courts because that's not my experience. quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness Facts. They're so inconvenient aren't they? Especially when they conflict with your idiotic and unfounded beliefs. Facts: try getting some instead of spouting unadulterated bullshit and spin.

PeonForHer -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 12:27:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic dear god, I read a piece in gizmodo this morning from another clueless male http://gizmodo.com/please-dont-glue-your-vagina-shut-during-your-period-1792723055 Its worth reading. Sweet Jesus - I saw that one on Facebook recently. Shudder. It reminded me of what I first assumed - in common with many other males - when I first heard of press-on sanitary towels.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 12:35:12 PM)
I smacked my head when I read it, I didnt follow it up to see if it was fake, but it should be. I didnt see it on facebook, but one of the news feed I use I would discuss the problems with it, as a woman...but we cant do the "truth about menstruation" cos it collys some poor peoples wobbles.[;)]

WhoreMods -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 12:37:56 PM)
Somebody with a medical qualification actually came up with this absurd notion? Dearie me.

PeonForHer -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 12:40:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I smacked my head when I read it, I didnt follow it up to see if it was fake, but it should be. I didnt see it on facebook, but one of the news feed I use I would discuss the problems with it, as a woman...but we cant do the "truth about menstruation" cos it collys some poor peoples wobbles.[;)] Hmm. Hmmm. Yes. I see that. Awkward wincing and shifting in seats.

PeonForHer -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 1:00:48 PM)
quote: Lack of respect? You pathetic loser. Women do not deserve respect because they possess a vagina. People deserve a certain minimum of respect on account of they're people, A. That was one of the essential principles on which civilised society was founded. Everybody depends upon that principle, you included. God, man - it's not as if you're in your early twenties any more. Please try to re-learn the advantages of having grown up.

respectmen -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 5:46:45 PM)
Awareness is right about loony Lucy the feminazi. In another thread a long time ago where reproduction rights came up, Lucy said exactly what Awareness is saying now. The dumbass dungeon bitch thinks men are ATMs in regards of reproduction rights.

LadyPact -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 9:48:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Somebody with a medical qualification actually came up with this absurd notion? Dearie me. I know. I thought that idiotic 19 year old who was promoting "women can hold their period in if they try hard enough" was bad.

DesFIP -> RE: "Gender Budgeting": The Latest Feminist Plan to Rip-Off Taxpayers (2/25/2017 10:02:08 PM)
In the US child support is 17 percent. Divided by the number of children. So if you earn $500 per week, that's a grand total of $85, if I've done the math correctly in my head. That $85 needs to cover housing, food, clothing, medical expenses, school needs. Now that Congress is planning to rescind free breakfasts and lunches in schools for those below the poverty line, it won't cover much at all. How much do you think new sneakers cost? And during the teen years shoes can be outgrown every six weeks. Choose between feeding your child and clothing him. That's for one child. If he got three women pregnant, they're trying to support the child on a munificent $28.33 each. Won't even feed a kid for a week on that.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625