RE: SHADES OF THE PAST.

RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 8:51:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. I literally don't have to say anything else.

tamaka -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 9:12:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: InfoMan quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. I literally don't have to say anything else. It should be either: Your incompetence.... meaning the incompetence belonging to you OR You're incompetent.... meaning. 'You are incompetent'

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 10:14:36 AM)
ORIGINAL: tamaka ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. I literally don't have to say anything else. It should be either: Your incompetence.... meaning the incompetence belonging to you OR You're incompetent.... meaning. 'You are incompetent' You are incompetence???? Jesus you are phoquing stupid

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 10:18:48 AM)
ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. Maybe you could get an adult who speaks english to help you? I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. We are not in a dynamic sweetie so there is no reason to prostrate yourself in front of me. I literally don't have to say anything else. You seldom do.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 10:49:14 AM)
ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx That would be your puerile ignorant unsubstantiated opinion worth a little less than used shit paper. counterpoint is the relationship between voices that are harmonically interdependent (polyphony) yet independent in rhythm and contour.[1] It has been most commonly identified in the European classical tradition, strongly developing during the Renaissance and in much of the common practice period, especially in the Baroque. The term originates from the Latin punctus contra punctum meaning "point against point" Jesus you are phoquing stupid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpoint punctus does not mean 'point' it means 'prick' https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/punctus Literally it translates from 'Prick against prick' This is indicative of string instruments which you prick or pluck the strings to create notes. Then your arguement would be against wiki and their latin dictionary,,,not me. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. quote: Here is a hint miss infoman. From where and to where are aircraft operated. the document in question does not outline this at any part nor even imply it at any part. Yes it does and yes I did cite it for you What's more - even if it did... Aircraft can land on non-airfields.... Drop Zones, Aircraft Carriers, and Assault Craft can all land a myriad of aircraft that have been properly modified to land at those points. Which the cite provided addresses. Had you actually read ac 20-169 you would have read the part I quoted which disproves your opinion. What's more - the FAA does not have an absolute say in if something is an International Airport or not The cite I posted says you are, as usual miss infoman, full of shit. - again US Military Bases are International Airports under the definition of what makes an 'International Airport' Not according to the cite I posted from the faa. Jesus you are phoquing stuipid. Find the specific Quote. Paragraph, Page, Line. Quote it Directly. Your post #97 of this thread has the text you supplied. My post #130 Is the quote from the text you provided. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You have literally cited NOTHING, and until you can provide proof that your citation says specifically what you think it says, your citation will count for nothing in this argument. You are the one who posted the text of ac 20-169. Are you now saying it is incorrect and you have posted a lie? Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Once again miss infoman is talking out of her ass. The only international flights that nas norfolk handles are the ones that the faa is requested and paid to perform customs inspections. All other flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil . Jesus you are phoquing stupid. 2013 G8 in Belfast - Air Force One lands at Belfast International Airport. Set off point: Andrews Air Force Base. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHplMuvkOFs Left nas norfolk (after clearing customs that were requested and paid for)...landed at belfast international and cleared customs. What is your point dumbass? So this little theory that US Military Aircraft only take off and land on other Military bases... yeah it is wrong. Perhaps if you were to get a grown up to help you with the big words you would know I did not say that. Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 1:42:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: InfoMan quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. I literally don't have to say anything else. It should be either: Your incompetence.... meaning the incompetence belonging to you OR You're incompetent.... meaning. 'You are incompetent' Yes, i understand that. The point i was trying to make is that he is nitpicking singular words out of entire posts to try and prove... something. I don't expect to be right all the time, and i more then realize i will make ample grammatical mistakes and poor word choice. but the difference between what i do and what he is doing is that he nitpicks a single statement and uses it as a distraction, while i use it as an example of his refusal to acknowledge, accept, or understand key points/facts/statements. The example is supposed to be the fact that he literally just quoted 4 words out of a 3 paragraph reply. Sorry if that wasn't clear enough. Of course, i could always argue it in a different way, because technically i am not wrong either.

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 2:01:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. Maybe you could get an adult who speaks english to help you? I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. We are not in a dynamic sweetie so there is no reason to prostrate yourself in front of me. I literally don't have to say anything else. You seldom do. No - the statement is perfectly correct. Now because you cannot read English - the fact that this was an insult was lost on you unfortunately. You see - i'm not saying that you possess incompetence (which would correctly be 'your incompetence') but rather you are the literal definition of incompetence. You ARE incompetence. You embody it completely. ... personify it. Everything you've done and continue to do just simply propagates that fact.

tamaka -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 2:06:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: InfoMan quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: InfoMan quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan If anything, you're incompetence You're means you are...the word you mean is your which shows possession. Jesus you are phoquing stupid I... Don't know how to reply to this. I mean... you just proved exactly what i was saying. I literally don't have to say anything else. It should be either: Your incompetence.... meaning the incompetence belonging to you OR You're incompetent.... meaning. 'You are incompetent' Yes, i understand that. The point i was trying to make is that he is nitpicking singular words out of entire posts to try and prove... something. I don't expect to be right all the time, and i more then realize i will make ample grammatical mistakes and poor word choice. but the difference between what i do and what he is doing is that he nitpicks a single statement and uses it as a distraction, while i use it as an example of his refusal to acknowledge, accept, or understand key points/facts/statements. The example is supposed to be the fact that he literally just quoted 4 words out of a 3 paragraph reply. Sorry if that wasn't clear enough. Of course, i could always argue it in a different way, because technically i am not wrong either. Oh... ok. : )

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 2:39:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx That would be your puerile ignorant unsubstantiated opinion worth a little less than used shit paper. counterpoint is the relationship between voices that are harmonically interdependent (polyphony) yet independent in rhythm and contour.[1] It has been most commonly identified in the European classical tradition, strongly developing during the Renaissance and in much of the common practice period, especially in the Baroque. The term originates from the Latin punctus contra punctum meaning "point against point" Jesus you are phoquing stupid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpoint punctus does not mean 'point' it means 'prick' https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/punctus Literally it translates from 'Prick against prick' This is indicative of string instruments which you prick or pluck the strings to create notes. Then your arguement would be against wiki and their latin dictionary,,,not me. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. quote: quote: Here is a hint miss infoman. From where and to where are aircraft operated. the document in question does not outline this at any part nor even imply it at any part. Yes it does and yes I did cite it for you What's more - even if it did... Aircraft can land on non-airfields.... Drop Zones, Aircraft Carriers, and Assault Craft can all land a myriad of aircraft that have been properly modified to land at those points. Which the cite provided addresses. Had you actually read ac 20-169 you would have read the part I quoted which disproves your opinion. What's more - the FAA does not have an absolute say in if something is an International Airport or not The cite I posted says you are, as usual miss infoman, full of shit. - again US Military Bases are International Airports under the definition of what makes an 'International Airport' Not according to the cite I posted from the faa. Jesus you are phoquing stuipid. Find the specific Quote. Paragraph, Page, Line. Quote it Directly. Your post #97 of this thread has the text you supplied. My post #130 Is the quote from the text you provided. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You have literally cited NOTHING, and until you can provide proof that your citation says specifically what you think it says, your citation will count for nothing in this argument. You are the one who posted the text of ac 20-169. Are you now saying it is incorrect and you have posted a lie? Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You are attempting to cite the following as Proof: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. Aircraft operated by U.S. government agencies (including the FAA) are also public-use aircraft and may also be exempt from compliance with civil airworthiness regulations, and to some extent, operational regulations. Though not required by FAA regulations, some governmental agencies have policies to maintain the airworthiness of the baseline aircraft by requiring FAA approval for any modifications. In it, you are specifically attempting to state that 'Operations' means 'Airport'. This is, unfortunately incorrect. Operations is the operation of the aircraft while it is in flight. This guideline would specifically outline the cruising altitudes, speeds, and acceptable flight tolerances and limitations of the aircraft to maintain a safe flight for not only the plane but the occupants. It in no way defines, identifies, or even attempts to explain 'Airfields' in any sense of the word. quote: Once again miss infoman is talking out of her ass. The only international flights that nas norfolk handles are the ones that the faa is requested and paid to perform customs inspections. All other flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil . Jesus you are phoquing stupid. 2013 G8 in Belfast - Air Force One lands at Belfast International Airport. Set off point: Andrews Air Force Base. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHplMuvkOFs Left nas norfolk (after clearing customs that were requested and paid for)...landed at belfast international and cleared customs. What is your point dumbass? Oh this is all kinds of incorrect. What, you think Air Force One rolls up to the Terminal and the President has to take off his shoes as he goes through Security and walk through those flimsy metal detectors? Air Force One is a Diplomatic Aircraft, it completely bypasses customs and immigration even if it lands in LAX or JFK International. The plane off-loads on the tarmac and the occupants and supplies are loaded into Government owned vehicles with out ever being checked or processed by any one. The idea that they would bus out a bunch of Customs and Immigration guys to Norfolk Naval Station just to get bypassed by the President and his staff as they get onto Air Force One, while a funny thought, does not happen. quote: So this little theory that US Military Aircraft only take off and land on other Military bases... yeah it is wrong. Perhaps if you were to get a grown up to help you with the big words you would know I did not say that. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You said exactly that: Post #157 flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 6:53:46 PM)
ORIGINAL: InfoMan If anything, you're incompetence and constant reaching to try and disprove some one vastly smarter then you is amusing to me. Above is your original statement. Below is your puerile attempt to lie your way out of it. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. No - the statement is perfectly correct. Now because you cannot read English - the fact that this was an insult was lost on you unfortunately. You see - i'm not saying that you possess incompetence (which would correctly be 'your incompetence') but rather you are the literal definition of incompetence. You ARE incompetence. You embody it completely. ... personify it. Roflmfao Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/15/2017 7:31:39 PM)
ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx That would be your puerile ignorant unsubstantiated opinion worth a little less than used shit paper. counterpoint is the relationship between voices that are harmonically interdependent (polyphony) yet independent in rhythm and contour.[1] It has been most commonly identified in the European classical tradition, strongly developing during the Renaissance and in much of the common practice period, especially in the Baroque. The term originates from the Latin punctus contra punctum meaning "point against point" Jesus you are phoquing stupid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpoint punctus does not mean 'point' it means 'prick' https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/punctus From your cite: English: point Then your arguement would be against wiki and their latin dictionary,,,not me. Even when you cite wiki it says you are wrong. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Here is a hint miss infoman. From where and to where are aircraft operated. the document in question does not outline this at any part nor even imply it at any part. Yes it does and yes I did cite it for you What's more - even if it did... Aircraft can land on non-airfields.... Drop Zones, Aircraft Carriers, and Assault Craft can all land a myriad of aircraft that have been properly modified to land at those points. Which the cite provided addresses. Had you actually read ac 20-169 you would have read the part I quoted which disproves your opinion. What's more - the FAA does not have an absolute say in if something is an International Airport or not The cite I posted says you are, as usual miss infoman, full of shit. - again US Military Bases are International Airports under the definition of what makes an 'International Airport' Not according to the cite I posted from the faa. Jesus you are phoquing stuipid. Find the specific Quote. Paragraph, Page, Line. Quote it Directly. Your post #97 of this thread has the text you supplied. My post #130 Is the quote from the text you provided. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You have literally cited NOTHING, and until you can provide proof that your citation says specifically what you think it says, your citation will count for nothing in this argument. You are the one who posted the text of ac 20-169. Are you now saying it is incorrect and you have posted a lie? Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You are attempting to cite the following as Proof: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. In it, you are specifically attempting to state that 'Operations' means 'Airport'. I did not say nor imply that. You said that. Ac 20-169 says: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. Certification is the paperwork to validate airworthyness. Maintainance are the procedures used in the maintainance of the aircraft. Operation is all aspects of the operation of the aircraft which would include but not limited to where and how it takes off, where and how it lands. That you wish it were otherwise is not my problem. This is, unfortunately incorrect. That would be your ignorant puerile unsubstantiated opinion. Until you can validate it it will remain your opinion and nothing more. Operations is the operation of the aircraft while it is in flight. cite please Once again miss infoman is talking out of her ass. The only international flights that nas norfolk handles are the ones that the faa is requested and paid to perform customs inspections. All other flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil . Jesus you are phoquing stupid. 2013 G8 in Belfast - Air Force One lands at Belfast International Airport. Set off point: Andrews Air Force Base. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHplMuvkOFs Left nas norfolk (after clearing customs that were requested and paid for)...landed at belfast international and cleared customs. What is your point dumbass? Oh this is all kinds of incorrect. What, you think Air Force One rolls up to the Terminal and the President has to take off his shoes as he goes through Security and walk through those flimsy metal detectors? Air Force One is a Diplomatic Aircraft, it completely bypasses customs and immigration even if it lands in LAX or JFK International. The plane off-loads on the tarmac and the occupants and supplies are loaded into Government owned vehicles with out ever being checked or processed by any one. The idea that they would bus out a bunch of Customs and Immigration guys to Norfolk Naval Station just to get bypassed by the President and his staff as they get onto Air Force One, while a funny thought, does not happen. The president has a diplomatic passport as do the 'politicos' on the aircraft. The press corps and other non diplomats carry regular passports. Everyone goes through customs in a private and expidited manner. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. So this little theory that US Military Aircraft only take off and land on other Military bases... yeah it is wrong. Perhaps if you were to get a grown up to help you with the big words you would know I did not say that. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You said exactly that: Post #157 flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil. Here is what I said: Once again miss infoman is talking out of her ass. The only international flights that nas norfolk handles are the ones that the faa is requested and paid to perform customs inspections. All other flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil . Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Interesting how in an effort to lie your way out of the hole you have dug yourself you did not put in the whole quote. Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/16/2017 5:31:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan If anything, you're incompetence and constant reaching to try and disprove some one vastly smarter then you is amusing to me. Above is your original statement. Below is your puerile attempt to lie your way out of it. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. 'puerile' was replaced with 'juvenile' long ago... continuing to use that word just makes you seem like you're trying to sound like you're smarter then you really are. Like a 7 year old that discovered fancy nickle word and is trying to use it at every chance they can. and it really isn't a lie. you are the embodiment of incompetence. See how rather then engaging the statement - you instead just simply say what basically amounts to 'Nuh-uh! You are Wrong!!' while stamping your feet and using words that no one uses...

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/16/2017 8:20:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx That would be your puerile ignorant unsubstantiated opinion worth a little less than used shit paper. There it is again. I mean people in the Juvenile Court system don't use the word juvenile nearly as much as you have used puerile in the posts of this single thread... quote: counterpoint is the relationship between voices that are harmonically interdependent (polyphony) yet independent in rhythm and contour.[1] It has been most commonly identified in the European classical tradition, strongly developing during the Renaissance and in much of the common practice period, especially in the Baroque. The term originates from the Latin punctus contra punctum meaning "point against point" Jesus you are phoquing stupid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpoint punctus does not mean 'point' it means 'prick' https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/punctus From your cite: English: point Then your arguement would be against wiki and their latin dictionary,,,not me. Even when you cite wiki it says you are wrong. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. well if you would cite properly... or did basic investigation... if you could read English... Descendants Asturian: puntu Catalan: punt, punta English: point French: point, pointe Friulian: pont, ponte German: Punkt decedents =/= definition or meaning thus your citation fails. quote: Here is a hint miss infoman. From where and to where are aircraft operated. the document in question does not outline this at any part nor even imply it at any part. Yes it does and yes I did cite it for you What's more - even if it did... Aircraft can land on non-airfields.... Drop Zones, Aircraft Carriers, and Assault Craft can all land a myriad of aircraft that have been properly modified to land at those points. Which the cite provided addresses. Had you actually read ac 20-169 you would have read the part I quoted which disproves your opinion. What's more - the FAA does not have an absolute say in if something is an International Airport or not The cite I posted says you are, as usual miss infoman, full of shit. - again US Military Bases are International Airports under the definition of what makes an 'International Airport' Not according to the cite I posted from the faa. Jesus you are phoquing stuipid. Find the specific Quote. Paragraph, Page, Line. Quote it Directly. Your post #97 of this thread has the text you supplied. My post #130 Is the quote from the text you provided. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You have literally cited NOTHING, and until you can provide proof that your citation says specifically what you think it says, your citation will count for nothing in this argument. You are the one who posted the text of ac 20-169. Are you now saying it is incorrect and you have posted a lie? Jesus you are phoquing stupid. You are attempting to cite the following as Proof: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. In it, you are specifically attempting to state that 'Operations' means 'Airport'. I did not say nor imply that. You said that. Ac 20-169 says: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. Certification is the paperwork to validate airworthyness. Maintainance are the procedures used in the maintainance of the aircraft. Operation is all aspects of the operation of the aircraft which would include but not limited to where and how it takes off, where and how it lands. That you wish it were otherwise is not my problem. This is, unfortunately incorrect. That would be your ignorant puerile unsubstantiated opinion. Until you can validate it it will remain your opinion and nothing more. Operations is the operation of the aircraft while it is in flight. cite please https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Aircraft_operations Aircraft Operations does not restrict you to where aircraft can take off or land. All it provides is the minimum safe distance required for the aircraft to come to a complete stop, and the minimum safe Speed required for the aircraft to generate enough lift to take off. Knowing these functions has allowed pilots to land aircraft on strips of Road, open fields, and hastily constructed Forward Operating Bases for the Military. the FAA in no way restricts the locations where you can take off or land so long as it does not interrupt with Class B or C Flight Operations, This is why individuals that fly privately or for recreation with short range prop planes, sailplanes, or powered gliders can operate from open fields or private property with-out incurring citations and write ups from the FAA. quote: The president has a diplomatic passport as do the 'politicos' on the aircraft. The press corps and other non diplomats carry regular passports. Everyone goes through customs in a private and expidited manner. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. They are processed by Secret Service and Military Police on Air Force One if they are even invited. Reciving International Airports may process them through customs, but again - they don't go inviting Customs to Andrew's just to be bypassed. And what about the many situations where there is no press on board? Does customs come out there to watch the president and politicos just bypass them in your mind? quote: You said exactly that: Post #157 flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil. Here is what I said: Once again miss infoman is talking out of her ass. The only international flights that nas norfolk handles are the ones that the faa is requested and paid to perform customs inspections. All other flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil . Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Interesting how in an effort to lie your way out of the hole you have dug yourself you did not put in the whole quote. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. I quoted the relevant part of the statement (which i underlined in your reply) verbatim. I also took it upon myself to link the statement itself so that people could read the entire statement in it's context if needed. There is no lie there, nor does this reply in any way to what was posted. the Counter point which you are avoiding is that Military Air Bases send aircraft to Non-Military Air Bases all the time. something which you have yet to refute... you simply are attempting to misdirect.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/16/2017 9:29:55 AM)
Perhaps you could clarify for us this point. Who designates what an international airport/aoe in amerika is?

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/17/2017 9:49:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx Perhaps you could clarify for us this point. Who designates what an international airport/aoe in amerika is? No one. An 'International Airport' is not the same as a 'Port of Entry' (what you're calling aoe) The FAA doesn't use the definition 'International Airport' nor is that any official designation used in any of their asset cataloging systems. The DHS and CBP also do not define what an 'International Airport' is just simply what a Port of Entry is, which can include Airports. The title International Airport is often defined for commercial purposes by the owners of the Airport as a method to allow consumers to know that the Airport is capable of legally handling flights which enter and exit the United States.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/17/2017 9:58:37 AM)
Perhaps you could clarify for us this point. Who designates what a poe or aoe in amerika is?

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/17/2017 6:42:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx Perhaps you could clarify for us this point. Who designates what a poe or aoe in amerika is? ... No one. amerika isn't a place. If you mean America, then it still is no one specific - there are a number of nations which comprise the land mass defined as 'America'. And really - what is the point of this string of questioning? you could just as easily find out Who designates a Port of Entry for (insert country here) by simply using google.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/17/2017 7:08:25 PM)
ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx Perhaps you could clarify for us this point. Who designates what a poe or aoe in amerika is? ... No one. amerika isn't a place. If you mean America, then it still is no one specific - there are a number of nations which comprise the land mass defined as 'America'. And really - what is the point of this string of questioning? you could just as easily find out Who designates a Port of Entry for (insert country here) by simply using google. You seem pretty intent on dodging the question, why is that? You have told us that nas norfolk and andrews afb are international airports. Thus far your opinion is the only validation you have offered for this premis. If you wish to have a discussion about this then it would seem important to define the terms used. Why is it that after more than a hundred and seventy post related to this discussion you now suddenly cannot remember what country we are discussing? If you do not know the answer then say so. If it is so easy to discover on google as you say then why can you not post it? Is it because you are a sniviling puerile whistle punk who has let his alligator mouth overload his canary ass or just a lying punkassmotherphoquer? Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

thompsonx -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/17/2017 7:47:02 PM)
ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx That would be your puerile ignorant unsubstantiated opinion worth a little less than used shit paper. There it is again. I mean people in the Juvenile Court system don't use the word juvenile nearly as much as you have used puerile in the posts of this single thread... It is an alcolade that seems to fit you like a glove. What's more - the FAA does not have an absolute say in if something is an International Airport or not The cite I posted says you are, as usual miss infoman, full of shit. - again US Military Bases are International Airports under the definition of what makes an 'International Airport' Not according to the cite I posted from the faa. Jesus you are phoquing stuipid. You are attempting to cite the following as Proof: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. In it, you are specifically attempting to state that 'Operations' means 'Airport'. I did not say nor imply that. You said that. Ac 20-169 says: Aircraft operated by the military are by statute public-use aircraft and are not subject to the civil regulatory requirements for certification, maintenance, and operation. Certification is the paperwork to validate airworthyness. Maintainance are the procedures used in the maintainance of the aircraft. Operation is all aspects of the operation of the aircraft which would include but not limited to where and how it takes off, where and how it lands. That you wish it were otherwise is not my problem. This is, unfortunately incorrect. That would be your ignorant puerile unsubstantiated opinion. Until you can validate it it will remain your opinion and nothing more. Operations is the operation of the aircraft while it is in flight. cite please https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Aircraft_operations Aircraft Operations does not restrict you to where aircraft can take off or land. As i mentioned above operation is all aspects of the operation of the aircraft which would include but not limited to where and how it takes off, where and how it lands. These issues are delt with specifically in the cite you provided. That you wish it were otherwise is not my problem. All it provides is the minimum safe distance required for the aircraft to come to a complete stop, and the minimum safe Speed required for the aircraft to generate enough lift to take off. Wrong again. Those are specs generated by the a/c manufacturter not the faa. the FAA in no way restricts the locations where you can take off or land so long as it does not interrupt with Class B or C Flight Operations, Ac 20=169 clearly states that the faa has no jurisdiction of military airfields. The president has a diplomatic passport as do the 'politicos' on the aircraft. The press corps and other non diplomats carry regular passports. Everyone goes through customs in a private and expidited manner. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. They are processed by Secret Service and Military Police on Air Force One if they are even invited. The secret service and military police have no customs functions. The press routinely travels on airforce 1. Reciving International Airports may process them through customs, but again - they don't go inviting Customs to Andrew's just to be bypassed. One does not need to show a passport nor go through customs when departing amerika, why would you think that you do? And what about the many situations where there is no press on board? Does customs come out there to watch the president and politicos just bypass them in your mind? The aircrew have normal passports. They like the president and any invited guest on board must go through customs at the non military airport in the foriegn country that they land in. Here is what I said: Once again miss infoman is talking out of her ass. The only international flights that nas norfolk handles are the ones that the faa is requested and paid to perform customs inspections. All other flights into and out of nas norfolk go to or come from amerikan military bases which are technically amerikan soil. and thus not international in the sense you claim. Ace mccain was born on a military base in panama. That makes him a natural born amerikan citizen and elligible to run for president. That military base and all other amerikan millitary bases around the world are considered amerikan soil . Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Interesting how in an effort to lie your way out of the hole you have dug yourself you did not put in the whole quote. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. I quoted the relevant part of the statement (which i underlined in your reply) verbatim. I also took it upon myself to link the statement itself so that people could read the entire statement in it's context if needed. There is no lie there, nor does this reply in any way to what was posted. the Counter point which you are avoiding is that Military Air Bases send aircraft to Non-Military Air Bases all the time. something which you have yet to refute... you simply are attempting to misdirect. As pointed out above when a military a/c departs a military base and lands at a non military base in a foriegn country the passengers must go through customs in that country.

InfoMan -> RE: SHADES OF THE PAST. (3/17/2017 8:25:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: InfoMan ORIGINAL: thompsonx Perhaps you could clarify for us this point. Who designates what a poe or aoe in amerika is? ... No one. amerika isn't a place. If you mean America, then it still is no one specific - there are a number of nations which comprise the land mass defined as 'America'. And really - what is the point of this string of questioning? you could just as easily find out Who designates a Port of Entry for (insert country here) by simply using google. You seem pretty intent on dodging the question, why is that? You have told us that nas norfolk and andrews afb are international airports. Thus far your opinion is the only validation you have offered for this premis. If you wish to have a discussion about this then it would seem important to define the terms used. Why is it that after more than a hundred and seventy post related to this discussion you now suddenly cannot remember what country we are discussing? Actually it is directly answering the question... There is no place called 'amerika' In fact - if you want me to be entirely factual: The United States Department of Defense defines 'poe' and 'aoe' PoE is 'Point of Exposure' used by the Military in defining the efficacy of Chemical and Biological weapons. AoE is 'Area of Effect' used by the Military to denote the effective radius of High Explosive ordinance. You are asking really stupid questions really vaguely in order to try and create some stupid niche opening to expose all of nothing. quote: If you do not know the answer then say so. If it is so easy to discover on google as you say then why can you not post it? Is it because you are a sniviling puerile whistle punk who has let his alligator mouth overload his canary ass or just a lying punkassmotherphoquer? Jesus you are phoquing stupid. America is a landmass, not a single nation. The most common land mass denoted as just 'America' tends to be north America, containing 3 Major countries. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defines what a port of entry is and provides rules and regulations for the United States, which the Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP) enforces. However, what 'designates' a Port of Entry is actually the civil authority whom has control over the facilities in question. It is the decision of the civil body that possesses the property in question to identify wither or not they wish to be a Port of Entry or not. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) handles immigration and customs for Canada, however with the definitions are identified by Canada's governing body. In recent years with the raising of 'sanctuary cities' and more loosely defined border regulations - what is defined as a 'Port of Entry' is becoming more tenuious. That being said - the Department of Homeland Security of the United States has set up agreements in Canadian Airports to create 'pre-screened depatures' in which United States Customs and Immigration screen an aircraft Before it leaves for the United States - thus meaning that technically the DHS defines and designates at least a handful of places which it considers 'Port of Entry' is in Canada. The 2008 law which made illegal immigration a nonpunishable crime in Mexico is still on the books, despite harsh language held by the President of Mexico and several leading federal authorities in the Federal Police concerning human and drug trafficking coming in from Central and South America. Meaning the designations and definitions in that country are very 'loose' as there is no central governing body which thoroughly defines or enforces rules and regulations that i can find. It is not that i don't know... it is that i don't see the point in sharing all of this information with you because all you're going to do is ask another very vague limited question thinking that it will be the keystone which will deconstruct my argument.

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125