RE: Political topics that we can support (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Political topics that we can support


Zero Tolerence for illegal immigrents.
  6% (13)
Intelligent gun control legislation
  6% (13)
Intelligent health care reform (since the ACA may be going away)
  8% (16)
Welfare reform, explain how please
  4% (9)
Limited foreign involvment of US military
  6% (13)
Stronger border security (i.e drug and illegal aliens)
  6% (13)
sensible enviromental protection (stopping excessive pollution)
  8% (17)
Education reform
  7% (14)
College finance reform
  6% (13)
Tax code reform (explain where changes are needed)
  6% (12)
Zero guns
  3% (6)
Term limits for congress
  7% (15)
Alternative energy research incentives
  7% (15)
Infrastructure rebuilding
  10% (21)
Mandatory public service (does not have to be military)
  3% (6)


Total Votes : 196
(last vote on : 3/9/2017 6:01:16 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


Kirata -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 12:15:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I tried the PM again.

Is that working? I sent you a PM, but I don't know if it went.

K.





BoscoX -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 12:33:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I tried the PM again.

Is that working? I sent you a PM, but I don't know if it went.

K.




I got it this time, got the super-secret handshake down now...




vincentML -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 5:30:01 PM)

quote:

So, if I am reading you correctly, you simply believe that destructive change is good, and will automatically lead to something "better"?

That any system that had or has had less than perfect origins is suspect by default, and is inherently and unambiguously wrong or even "evil"?

In other words, if I understand your underlying method and motives:

You philosophically believe our current system is tainted and irredeemable, due to hypocrisy on some or all of the people or peoples who espoused the principles of classical liberalism, and that the only way to "fix" it, is to seek ... revolution?

And, that one can't envision the replacement ... because advocating any other principles (other than Justice and Liberty) is .. delusional?


Seems I am not expressing my ideas clearly enough, Firm.

Locke, Madison, and Jefferson should not be enshrined because as slave owners or traffickers they exploited humans.

Did I use the word “evil?” No, our system has been flawed throughout its history and earned my criticism by itself.

We look at our history differently, Firm.

I did not value destructive change, the change that followed, nor revolution. I was merely pointing out how societies and cultures are changed. Seen many telephone operators lately?

Irredeemable? No. But, it is an eternal struggle.

Envisioning a replacement, i.e. planning from the top, is delusional because societies and cultures generally grow organically through their histories. However, one can and ought to be concerned if specific values are lacking or abused.

quote:

First, what is "justice"? and what is "liberty", in your mind?


Justice and Liberty for all have been wanting in our history. I wrote earlier in the thread: “By justice I mean substantive and procedural fairness. Evidence of unfairness: of 2000 prisoners exonerated since 1989 more than half were black while only 13% of the population was black. At least 20% of those innocent black men were convicted because of police misconduct.”

Justice and Liberty are benefits more easily obtained by the affluent than the poor. Poor people are jailed for minor traffic offenses and kept there when they cannot afford bail. Two thousand inmates have been exonerated since 1989. DNA testing freed 343. We have the highest per cap incarceration rate in the world. The Court and Congress have deferred to the Executive to go to war, employ rendition, and savagely torture “combatants” even American citizens.

civil liberties and political freedom had to be gained through blood sacrifice in the streets and are still only partially available for certain groups.

representative democracy . . . the right to vote is again being obstructed by the states.

rule of law . . . I support a fair rule of law.

free market capitalism . . . I support markets with proper regulations and voluntary corporate social responsibility that is employed to the benefit of the product line as well as the society. The credit debacle of 2008 confirmed the need for regulations.

empiricism in science, of course

common law as interpreted by the Courts?

societal traditions and institutions selectively

religion or equivalent belief structures I favor separation of church and state, so okay as long as they are not imposed by the state.

Don’t you ever question the fairness of American Justice, Firm?

Regards . . . [:D]






FirmhandKY -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 5:35:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I tried the PM again.

Is that working? I sent you a PM, but I don't know if it went.

Maybe I'm saying it wrong.

I don't know if CMC - the forums - has a "PM" function. If so, I'm not getting it, probably because it appears that my email has disappeared from my profile.

I'm talking about a Collarspace system email, on the "other side".

Firm




Kirata -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 6:19:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I tried the PM again.

Is that working? I sent you a PM, but I don't know if it went.

Maybe I'm saying it wrong.

I don't know if CMC - the forums - has a "PM" function. If so, I'm not getting it, probably because it appears that my email has disappeared from my profile.

I'm talking about a Collarspace system email, on the "other side".

The Forums have a PM link at the bottom of the side panel to the left of your posts. As far as I can tell, it sends a regular collarspace email to your profile on the other side. I've used it before to contact people I couldn't mail directly because their profiles were hidden, and I know it works because I've received replies from them via my regular collarspace email. But I guess if your email has disappeared from your profile, that would be a problem. Heh.

To make a long story short, long time no see. Welcome back!

K.




Aylee -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 8:26:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I tried the PM again.

Is that working? I sent you a PM, but I don't know if it went.

K.




I tried sending a PM to Firm twice. I got a "no profile."




FirmhandKY -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 8:38:09 PM)

I've sent a "test" PM to both of you.

My profile is hidden, but valid. I logged onto and updated my age.

Dunno. Send me via your profile, and see if that works.

Firm




Kirata -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 8:46:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I've sent a "test" PM to both of you.

My profile is hidden, but valid. I logged onto and updated my age.

Dunno. Send me via your profile, and see if that works.

I haven't received anything, and can't send to you from my profile on the other side because yours comes up "Not Found".

K.




Aylee -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 9:01:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Locke, Madison, and Jefferson should not be enshrined because as slave owners or traffickers they exploited humans.


Yes, I have condensed your answer down to the two points that really stood out to me.

It has always amused me how liberals pretty much cling to the belief that the only slavery worth noting was American slavery. No one else did it as bad as we did it is there belief.

If not for slavery, we would have never gone past the Hunter/Gatherer phase of evolution. Large-scale agricultural endeavors past one hundred acres required a large number of people, and until the industrial age, that meant slaves.*

Is it right or fair to judge a man and his past culture by our own current culture? Do you believe that they were not aware of the contradiction? Were they able to choose a different culture? did they have the power to autocratically remake their culture? Is there an actual practical solution they could have used? That reflexive hatred of slavery means you have an excellent moral compass, but it can blind some people to the institution's history.


*"a caste or sub-group tied to agriculture, and with limited hope of advancement", whether that 'caste' were called "slaves", "serfs", or "untouchables" is cultural distinctions and semantics.




quote:

representative democracy . . . the right to vote is again being obstructed by the states.



That right of representative democracy is also being obstructed by illegal immigration. Is that fair? The number of representatives that each area gets is determined by the census. States and cities with large numbers of illegal aliens are in fact stealing and undermining other citizen's representation. How many fewer EC votes would blue states have without their large numbers of illegal aliens? What about representation in the state legislatures? How much representation is being stolen?






tamaka -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 9:04:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Locke, Madison, and Jefferson should not be enshrined because as slave owners or traffickers they exploited humans.


Yes, I have condensed your answer down to the two points that really stood out to me.

It has always amused me how liberals pretty much cling to the belief that the only slavery worth noting was American slavery. No one else did it as bad as we did it is there belief.

If not for slavery, we would have never gone past the Hunter/Gatherer phase of evolution. Large-scale agricultural endeavors past one hundred acres required a large number of people, and until the industrial age, that meant slaves.*

Is it right or fair to judge a man and his past culture by our own current culture? Do you believe that they were not aware of the contradiction? Were they able to choose a different culture? did they have the power to autocratically remake their culture? Is there an actual practical solution they could have used? That reflexive hatred of slavery means you have an excellent moral compass, but it can blind some people to the institution's history.


*"a caste or sub-group tied to agriculture, and with limited hope of advancement", whether that 'caste' were called "slaves", "serfs", or "untouchables" is cultural distinctions and semantics.




quote:

representative democracy . . . the right to vote is again being obstructed by the states.



That right of representative democracy is also being obstructed by illegal immigration. Is that fair? The number of representatives that each area gets is determined by the census. States and cities with large numbers of illegal aliens are in fact stealing and undermining other citizen's representation. How many fewer EC votes would blue states have without their large numbers of illegal aliens? What about representation in the state legislatures? How much representation is being stolen?





Which is most likely the actual underlying motivation of 'sanctuary cities'.




Lucylastic -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/12/2017 9:13:14 PM)

Some will be a bit upset at this then
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/court-says-texas-congressional-districts-gerrymandered-to-hurt-minorities/2017/03/11/97b6ab0a-0685-11e7-b9fa-ed727b644a0b_story.html

A panel of federal judges has ruled that Texas’s Republican-led legislature gerrymandered some of the state’s congressional districts to stunt the growing influence of minority voters.




vincentML -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/13/2017 9:34:50 AM)

quote:

Yes, I have condensed your answer down to the two points that really stood out to me.

I am thankful that you did. [:)]

quote:

If not for slavery, we would have never gone past the Hunter/Gatherer phase of evolution. Large-scale agricultural endeavors past one hundred acres required a large number of people, and until the industrial age, that meant slaves.*

Why isn't that an argument from "the ends justify the means?"

Isn't sharecropping an alternative, although it was terribly abused in America?

Isn't wage labor another alternative?

quote:

Is it right or fair to judge a man and his past culture by our own current culture? Do you believe that they were not aware of the contradiction? Were they able to choose a different culture? did they have the power to autocratically remake their culture? Is there an actual practical solution they could have used? That reflexive hatred of slavery means you have an excellent moral compass, but it can blind some people to the institution's history.

Excellent, thoughtful questions.

Slavery was abolished by the King of France in 1315 and again by Revolutionary France in 1794. Beginning with Vermont in 1777 and Pennsylvania in 1780 the Northern States abolished slavery by 1804. Both England and the United States abolished the international slave trade in 1807. There was widespread anti-slavery sentiment at the Founding, so I am not relying upon our current culture as you suggest.

Jefferson on slavery:

Throughout his entire life, Thomas Jefferson was a consistent opponent of slavery. Calling it a “moral depravity”1 and a “hideous blot,”2 he believed that slavery presented the greatest threat to the survival of the new American nation.3 Jefferson also thought that slavery was contrary to the laws of nature, which decreed that everyone had a right to personal liberty.4 These views were radical in a world where unfree labor was the norm.

At the time of the American Revolution, Jefferson was actively involved in legislation that he hoped would result in slavery’s abolition.5 In 1778, he drafted a Virginia law that prohibited the importation of enslaved Africans.6 In 1784, he proposed an ordinance that would ban slavery in the Northwest territories.7 But Jefferson always maintained that the decision to emancipate slaves would have to be part of a democratic process; abolition would be stymied until slaveowners consented to free their human property together in a large-scale act of emancipation. To Jefferson, it was anti-democratic and contrary to the principles of the American Revolution for the federal government to enact abolition or for only a few planters to free their slaves.8


Unfortunately for Jefferson's gradualism the slave population nearly doubled by 1830. Furthermore, Jefferson could have emancipated his own slaves, if he wanted to "walk the walk instead of talk the talk."

Read more here .

quote:

That right of representative democracy is also being obstructed by illegal immigration. Is that fair? The number of representatives that each area gets is determined by the census. States and cities with large numbers of illegal aliens are in fact stealing and undermining other citizen's representation. How many fewer EC votes would blue states have without their large numbers of illegal aliens? What about representation in the state legislatures? How much representation is being stolen?


I think your immigrant questions do not reflect reality. In 2017 there are 32 Republican controlled state legislatures, 12 Democratic controlled state legislatures, and 6 that are politically split. Do we really know where the illegals are and what their influence is?

Regards . . .





vincentML -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/13/2017 9:38:38 AM)

quote:

Which is most likely the actual underlying motivation of 'sanctuary cities'.

Well, no. The greater concentration of people of color in the cities reduces the ability of Democrats to prevail in the suburban and rural districts.




Musicmystery -> RE: Political topics that we can support (3/13/2017 9:39:26 AM)

There's widespread support in the poll for infrastructure. Let's contact our representatives and get this done!




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875