RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WhoreMods -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 4:34:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

We got a U.S. Senator actin' a little too friendly with the commie red threat

OMFG we're all gonna die


Awww, the sissybitch life loser is crying again?

What, this being the 80th time already of throwing a foam-mouthed fit after his side won? and still crying and braying? My goodness, we aren't even finished with the second month yet.

Just getting cranked up here, I'm sure.

I suppose I did forget that Trumps campaign promise was: "When I am elected, the WORLD will know what sissybitch crybabys the US is!!! "


"YEAHHH!!!!" "HAIL TRUMP!!!"



It could be worse: just imagine how the whiney bitch would be carrying on if his side had lost.
[sm=biggrin.gif]




heavyblinker -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 4:35:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

you are clearly an electiongate denier!


I keep wondering how they're going to refer to scandals after this, since clearly Watergate will no longer be the gold standard. The suffix 'gate' just won't have the same sensationalist kick.




mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 4:40:33 AM)

Spandau Ballet? Russia House? Commie Driveway?




bounty44 -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 4:56:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/what-the-cia-and-fbi-knew-about-trump-before-2016

The investigation is going to take some time.

Oh, no comrades, the nutsucker-communists are going to cause the FBI to quit by the millions if they are not prosecuted.


interesting how blogs are okay when you use them.

the rest is beside the point and not on topic.

in both cases, and in countless others around the forum, whats it like to have no intellectual integrity?




mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 5:33:20 AM)

I never said blogs were necessarily the problem, dogshit44, factless nutsucker slobberblogs are useless, however investigative reporting is another thing.
That work for you now? Hell even nutsucker slobberblogs that are truthful reporting from truthful sources (impossible from nutsucker originated felchgobble, they have to go to real media and get facts....)

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-sater-trump-20170223-story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/former-mafia-linked-figure-describes-association-with-trump/2016/05/17/cec6c2c6-16d3-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html?postshare=2101487546240302&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.8a3d89d7017a

Or so you can felchgobble, how about a nutsucker slobber blog for you to parrot?
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/02/20/who-is-felix-sater-and-why-should-you-care-if-he/

Your immoral cockgargling is showing you as the felchgobbling propaganda tool of the nutsucker-communist crime syndicate that you are, how does it feel to stick your finger in your nose, your thumb up your ass, your pants around your ankles and your tongue buried to the root in Il Douchovitches ass nursing out that PutinJizz, dogshit44?

You are as fucking retarded as you look in the garish light of day, toiletlicker.




Edwird -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 5:55:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
whats it like to have no intellectual integrity?


What's it like to have no intellectual capacity and no integrity at all? We like to hear from firsthand experience on these matters.




BoscoX -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:03:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


interesting how blogs are okay when you use them.



Him and his Siamese twin both




bounty44 -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:32:40 AM)

to be elucidate for the casual reader, here's an exposition on mnottertroll's position from a recent search:

"Nutsucker slobber blogs are not blogs. They are nutsucker slobber blogs…nutsucker slobber blogs are just for the feebleminded minneapolis airport bathroom nutsuckers to masturbate over, and spew stupid asswipe about, and attach their lips to, and felch"

"Nutsuckers slobber blogs are widely and well known (and have been voluminously documented) to be overwhelmingly factless horseshit."

in case the reader is wondering what qualifies:

Fox news opinion: "And other than it being a nutsucker slobber blog"

Townhall: "from a nutsucker slobberblog" [this one is the troll's favorite, and is called that over and over and over]

This in general response to the Hillary probed thread, in which many dozens of sources were used: "I dont expect there to be a topic, since it is a nutsucker slobberblog thread."

Judicial watch: "refelched from one nutsucker slobberblog."

Wikipedia: "This would indicate you felchgobbled this horseshit off a nutsucker slobberblog."

In general response on a thread which included a variety of sources and of course, a differing opinion: "no it begs no question ineffectual nutsucker slobberblog land is where you both residey, but you felchgobblers keep circlefelching each other, show your nutsucker love.............."

About worldnetdaily: "WND articles or another nutsucker slobberblog"

the drudge report: "Drudge is a nutsucker slobberblog"

Hotair: "Must be slow news if hotair (a nutsucker slobberblog)"

National review: "here in this nutsucker slobberblog piece"

Red state: "nutsucker slobber blogs by the nobody susan wright are still nutsucker slobber blogs of no value"

Standingrockfactchecker: "Lets give the answer in the slobberblog a first place on the asswipe scale."

Constitution.org: "makes several absurd and factless pronouncements in his slobberblog"

Real clear politics: "they go to nutsucker slobberblogs."

Washington post and law.cornell: "The world is not the surfactant slogan and jingo of the slobberblog"

cns news: "but is a nutsucker slobberblog"

Daily caller, Washington times, heritage foundation, IJ review: "Fake news are the sort of lies you felchgobblers put out…and that sort of nutsucker slobberblog, factless, lying asswipe."


I trust you get the idea----a "slobberblog" is pretty much anything the troll disagrees with and since he can never really deal effectually with the content, he can only try to impugn the source with his dismissive vulgarities.

there's this inexplicable gem from him too: "I am a conservative, you are not"




heavyblinker -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:32:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/what-the-cia-and-fbi-knew-about-trump-before-2016

The investigation is going to take some time.

Oh, no comrades, the nutsucker-communists are going to cause the FBI to quit by the millions if they are not prosecuted.


interesting how blogs are okay when you use them.

the rest is beside the point and not on topic.

in both cases, and in countless others around the forum, whats it like to have no intellectual integrity?



The person writing the blog is simply repeating reputable sources like this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/former-mafia-linked-figure-describes-association-with-trump/2016/05/17/cec6c2c6-16d3-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html

A lot of them are linked to in the post as well... is the Miami Herald fake news?




BoscoX -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:34:47 AM)

Bounty, that his the essence of how most alt left miscreants answer serious posts

Something like, "Un unh, you are a stinky butt poo-poo head"




BoscoX -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:42:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/what-the-cia-and-fbi-knew-about-trump-before-2016

The investigation is going to take some time.

Oh, no comrades, the nutsucker-communists are going to cause the FBI to quit by the millions if they are not prosecuted.


interesting how blogs are okay when you use them.

the rest is beside the point and not on topic.

in both cases, and in countless others around the forum, whats it like to have no intellectual integrity?



The person writing the blog is simply repeating reputable sources like this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/former-mafia-linked-figure-describes-association-with-trump/2016/05/17/cec6c2c6-16d3-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html

A lot of them are linked to in the post as well... is the Miami Herald fake news?


Washington Post Reporters Openly Defend Their Anti-Trump Bias

The Washington Post Takes Anti-Trump Bias To A New Level




mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:45:20 AM)

well, how hard is it to be anti-Trump, it used to be that most everyone in this country, including pedophile pimping nutsuckers were anti-communist, but look at the commie-nutsucker party now!!!!

Communism, its not just for commies anymore.




bounty44 -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:51:54 AM)

i don't have a problems with blogs.

I have a problem with mnottertroll using them when they suit his purpose and then consigning practically everything he disagrees with and legitimate blogs (as opposed to news and commentary sites) that get sited as "slobberblogs."









mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:54:44 AM)

You got more problems than that. You should have problems with nutsucker slobberblogs too, dogshit44, except you are a nutsucker and feebleminded, and you love nutsucker slobberblogs so you can felch them.




WickedsDesire -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 8:06:33 AM)

Comrade pinko Boscox the big typo – its fuking screamingly annoying and getting bigger as your madness grows, not that it would take long for a mutated strain of syphilis to over power your one brain cell – now play nice oh wait you bold it too - too late for thee

My apologies to everyone else. Good points are made with words and facts and how non fractured minds intepret them(and free will), not gigantic fonts, least of all caps unlike the mad fuk president Agent Orange






mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 8:33:05 AM)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/03/the-web-of-relationships-between-team-trump-and-russia/

Thats a pile of commie-nutsuckers there.




bounty44 -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 3:55:58 PM)

oh no comrades, townhall!

"Bullies With a Russian Fetish"

quote:


What is up with the Democrats’ obsession with Russia? With each new day, a new Russian conspiracy theory surfaces.

The Democrats’ latest Russian conspiracy is so terrifying, Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) says it’s giving him a “knot” in the pit of his stomach. Yes, a knot. A knot, because Attorney General [AG] Jeff Sessions didn’t live in a bubble as a senator. Rather, the former Alabama senator did what senators sometimes do and met with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Given Democrats’ logic, Schumer should resign for meeting with Vladimir Putin in 2003 and Nancy Pelosi should resign for meeting with former Russian President Medvedev and Kislyak in 2010. In fact, Fox News reports seven Democrats met with Kislyak in 2013 and the Daily Caller reports Kislyak visited the Obama White House 22 times between 2009 and 2016. Hmmm…

Sessions says his “meetings” had nothing to do with the Trump campaign and claims his answer during his confirmation hearing “was honest and correct as I understood it.”

Remarkably, Democrats believe that explanation is not okay for Sessions, but was perfectly acceptable for former Obama attorneys general.

If it was moral outrage, they wouldn’t be able to switch it on and off at will.

Democrats are deliberately causing this chaos to make Trump resign but it won’t happen. Trump should have his DOJ investigate the Democrat-Russian connections along with the Obama administration scandals Democrats ignored.

Democrats looked the other way when Eric Holder was accused of and later admitted to lying about the Obama administration’s Soviet Union-style surveillance of journalists critical of the administration. Perhaps this is where their obsession with Russia began. They also ignored Holder’s dealings with the New Black Panther voter suppression case and the Fast and Furious scandal.

Apparently, liberals’ “moral convictions” short-circuited the day Bill Clinton had a secret rendezvous at a Phoenix tarmac with then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch when Hillary was under FBI investigation. Their “moral convictions” were also switched off the day Obama’s DOJ let former IRS official Lois Lerner off the hook for alleged criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to testify about the politically-motivated targeting of taxpayers.

We didn’t hear Democrats demanding resignations or impeachment proceedings over the Benghazi cover-up when former National Security Advisor Susan Rice spread misleading information regarding the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack that Sen. John McCain described to CBS News as “absolutely false…the information was totally misleading, totally false.”

The double standard on display every day is ridiculous, and the red tide that washed over the 2016 electoral college map proves Americans took notice.

In November, Americans turned from squeamish Republicans who refused to fight the bullies with a Russian fetish and voted for a street-fighter named Donald J. Trump.

That’s why Trump’s supporters like it when Trump attacks the press because they watched former president Obama repeatedly attack Fox News and rightwing radio for eight years. Likewise, they care less if he appears “un-presidential.” They had eight years of a mom jeans-wearing president who goes down in history as the president who gave Queen Elizabeth an iPod and took selfies at Nelson Mandela’s memorial service. They’ll be interested in Trump’s tax returns when they see Obama’s college transcripts.

Maybe.

Presently, they don’t give one iota what Trump or his administration does or doesn’t do because all they want is someone to punch back. Democrats have repeatedly shown us they only play by one set of rules. Theirs. For far too long, they’ve gotten away with excusing the crooks and liars in their party and no one has called them to account.

Therefore, there isn’t a riot violent enough or a women’s march ridiculous enough or a Hollywood smear outlandish enough or a fake news headline outrageous enough, or, in this case, a Russian conspiracy theory believable enough -- to sway them to side with the bullies with a Russian fetish.


https://townhall.com/columnists/susanstamperbrown/2017/03/04/bullies-with-a-russian-fetish-n2293950




mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 5:49:11 PM)

And we return to dogshit44s regular factgobbling, which derails from his brain stem nubbin retardation slightly.

Oh, now we got Street Fighter Il Douchovitch. Da Svedanya NootZukorsh!




bounty44 -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/4/2017 6:18:37 PM)

"Jeff Sessions and the Democrats' Politburo Politics"

quote:

That oft-quoted (although likely misattributed) line of Harry Truman's -- "If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog" -- is in sore need of revision. These days not even the dogs are to be trusted. They're probably wired.

Everyone and everything else seems to be as our government has descended into the ugliest game of finger pointing and character assassination we have seen in years, focusing on -- in an epic role reversal, Democrats miraculously morphing into born-again hawks -- relations with Russia.

And, inadvertently, but perhaps inevitably, just as life imitates art, America is now imitating Russia. Our political life is beginning to resemble the Soviet Politburo, where out of favor politicians were suddenly disappeared or, at the height of the Stalin era, simply murdered. We're not murdering anybody yet, but we're certainly disappearing them.

First to go was now-former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn for reasons as yet indeterminate. He evidently talked to the Russians about something, but who knows what? That he was doing his job might even have been among the strongest of possibilities, not that that matters.

Now it's Attorney General Jeff Sessions' turn. He too is evidently guilty of speaking with the Russians, in this case their ambassador, when he was still a senator, once completely en passant at a public event and once, oh-cardinal-sin, in the senator's own office (what a clandestine venue!). What he said, as with Flynn, is as yet indeterminate, but if one is to believe Sessions, it doesn't add up to much. And since two retired U.S. military colonels were present at the meeting, it's hard to imagine Sessions -- even in the extremely remote chance he would consider such a thing -- would collude with the Russian ambassador about the election under those circumstances.

The legal case against the AG seems less than paper thin, hanging on whether Sessions fully answered a stumbling question that was vague in the first place and easily misconstrued, if indeed it was.

Nevertheless, calls ring out all over the Democratic Party for his resignation. In a bloodthirsty, yet pathetic, attempt to put a nail in Sessions' coffin, Sen. Claire McCaskill jumped in to say that members of her (and Sessions') Armed Services Committee were never supposed to meet with ambassadors -- such meetings were exclusively for the Foreign Relations Committee -- only to have photographic evidence of her own meeting with the Russian ambassador appear on Twitter within minutes along with several other embarrassing tweets of previous and subsequent meetings.

Hers was Politburo politics at its purest, behavior not all that distant from the purge trials where false accusations habitually sent defendants to Siberia. It has nothing whatsoever to do with ideology or the public interest and everything to do with power. Actually, the Soviets may have been more honest about it. At least when Stalin did away with Trotsky, he had an argument (sort of). Stalin wanted socialism in one country and Trotsky favored world revolution. (It also may show, in McCaskill's case, how smug self-interest begets premature senility.)

Meanwhile, the media is in a frenzy of connecting Trump to Russia, a zeal for the "truth" they did not even approximate when Obama was recorded in flagrante delicto on video cozily whispering assurances to Medvedev that he (Obama) would play ball with Vladimir Putin after Barack won his second election. If Trump were caught in such collusion, he might well have been hanged, certainly expunged from polite society, let alone impeached. Was what Obama did a "high crime" against the American people? Arguably. Unquestionably far more than anything Trump has done, notwithstanding the non-stop cries of the various jackals in politics and the media.

These media whores (jackals doesn't quite quite suffice) further act as if there is something relatively new in Russia spying on the U.S. when such activity goes back nearly a hundred years to the most revered of all Democratic administrations, FDR's. Alger Hiss and the Ware Group were actually infiltrating our State Department and other government agencies like Treasury en masse back then. (Ware had 75 members by 1934 and there were other groups.) Hiss went on to advise Roosevelt at Yalta and then to be instrumental in the formation of the United Nations, all while an agent of the GRU. If you think about it, that's a lot more serious than the cyber-spying going on now.

Nevertheless, the current behavior of our politicians is terrible for our country and the world, especially now that Jeff Sessions has recused himself from what I predict will soon, as the president himself noted on Facebook, be acknowledged to have been a witch hunt. Chuck Schumer, Al Franken, and Nancy Pelosi particularly have behaved despicably in the grand style of Politburo politicians. The whole fraudulent narrative of the Trump-Russia alliance was made clear by, of all people, The New Yorker's David Remnick, who pointed out the obvious -- the Russians, like almost everyone, assumed Hillary Clinton was going to win the presidency and that any disrupting they may have been doing was intended to damage her future administration. Trump was beside the point.

That the current attack on Sessions started to unspool only hours after Trump made an extremely successful speech to Congress is also hardly accidental. Our own intelligence agents are promoting disinfo just like the KGB, FSB and GRU. Our government, at least a significant part of it, is indeed imitating Russia.

ONE LAST THING: This attack on Sessions is so sleazy and bogus that Democrats may be getting themselves into deeper trouble than they have bargained on...


https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2017/03/02/jeff-sesssions-and-the-democrats-politburo-politics/






mnottertail -> RE: WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION OVER HERE (3/5/2017 5:50:35 AM)

There is no paper thin case. Its far thicker than the 25 year political assassination of hillary by the nutsuckers. The leaky minge boxes in the whitehouse are being bitten by the snake they befriended, the Russians.

Bloodthirsty nutsucker felchgobbling goons and thugs were calling for jailing Hillary, but no proof existed of any intentional wrongdoing, nor was there any law broken nor national security risk found. Not after 33 investigations. They illegally gerrymandered the country, felched the commies, had their convienient tool Comey perform a last minute hatchet job, and more.

The nutsuckers are stupid and talk into microphones, and that is the origin of their downfall. If it was worthy of all the nutsucker felchgobbling in those days, they should try to felchgobble out of the same side of their mouth on this issue. Or it will appear that they are toiletlicking in the airport bathrooms again.

America now has a great deal of swamp in one administration, and now is the time to drain it.





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875