FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery What you're missing is that my point from the start was irony pointing out the initial straw man. So let's get literal. Publishing someone's personal email is crap. But so is "today the media is reliable and tomorrow it's fake news." Ok, let's get literal. The entire argument you are trying to make i.e. "But so is- today the media is reliable and tomorrow it's fake news- is crap" IS a strawman itself. It is intended to distract from the OP's point, which is the publishing of a spouse's email, who isn't involved in politics, is nothing more than a partisan attack, and that partisan attack was by a major media organization. You want to discredit him because he used a report in a different media company to bring up the facts of the case. If we accept your apparent claim that if Bosco points out partisan actions by one media company when he claims that "the media" is partisan, then he is therefore forever more unable to use any story in any media organization because they are tainted. This then leaves him with no way to make any argument at all, since you will have pretty much restricted him to "right wing" sites and organizations, which you will then discredit because they are "right wing". This leaves him with no way to argue current events, and therefore silences him. Which, I suspect was your intention from the beginning, since silencing any who disagree with them is a major leftist goal and tactic. Again, all a strawman to his claim that the giving out of a spouse's private email address is a partisan act on the part of the Associated Press. But thanks for playing, MM. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|