RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 2:03:08 PM)

yelling louder than the next guy is not free speech, nutsucker, when you agreed with the notion that money is free speech, and corporations are people too, you sort of forgot to cockgargle, and felching is now the mode.


..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................



so, how about that NutsuckerCare, or TrumpCare....................?
whadda ya wanna call it?




bounty44 -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 2:06:13 PM)

felllllllllllllch gobble!




Aylee -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 4:15:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Shutting down free speech in the name of the radical alt left ideology through the use of useful idiots 101

Training also includes, how to destabilize America by flooding it with third worlders, how to further divide the country with a "hate Trump' agenda, fomenting hate among women and gays, and disrupting peaceful town hall discussions

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ACLU_RESISTANCE_TRAINING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-03-11-12-03-42


Public protest is a form of free speech, no matter which side you are on but it seems that you are saying that it is only free speech when it agrees with you.
;-)



The heckler's veto and the thug's veto are forms of censorship. Censorship is suppression of free speech. Free speech is enshrined in the Constitution.

And before I get comments about the 1st Amendment only referring to government suppression of speech: Yes, private citizens and institutions are bound to respect your rights. If you are speaking, no one has a right to assault you or those who want to hear you. Chanting to disrupt you might well fall under "breach of peace." And there is federal law about conspiring to interfere with civil rights.




BoscoX -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 4:41:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


The heckler's veto and the thug's veto are forms of censorship. Censorship is suppression of free speech. Free speech is enshrined in the Constitution.

And before I get comments about the 1st Amendment only referring to government suppression of speech: Yes, private citizens and institutions are bound to respect your rights. If you are speaking, no one has a right to assault you or those who want to hear you. Chanting to disrupt you might well fall under "breach of peace." And there is federal law about conspiring to interfere with civil rights.



More laws that Obama refused to enforce.




Milesnmiles -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 7:01:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles
Public protest is a form of free speech, no matter which side you are on but it seems that you are saying that it is only free speech when it agrees with you.
;-)

The heckler's veto and the thug's veto are forms of censorship. Censorship is suppression of free speech. Free speech is enshrined in the Constitution.

And before I get comments about the 1st Amendment only referring to government suppression of speech: Yes, private citizens and institutions are bound to respect your rights. If you are speaking, no one has a right to assault you or those who want to hear you. Chanting to disrupt you might well fall under "breach of peace." And there is federal law about conspiring to interfere with civil rights.

Thank you for your intelligent and well phrased comment.

And no, I was not going to say anything about “the 1st Amendment only referring to government suppression of speech”.

What I was saying is free speech is not always easily recognized.

If you come on two people arguing and yelling at each other, each one could be considered to be trying to suppress the free speech of the other, whether they realize it or not. What to do about it? Do you join one of the two sides and start yelling because you agree with that side? Or do you realize that both have the right to free speech and walk away or at least try to calm the situation down to where communication can take place?

As for the case of the gentleman speaker and the protesters in the hall. They should have been asked to leave and if they didn’t they should have been removed and placed outside, where they could have had access to free speech to their hearts content. In this case, no matter how hateful the speech they thought was going on inside, they did not have the authority to disrupt it inside the hall where it was happening.

Of course, violence is another story and is not free speech and should be dealt with by law enforcement.

But even then, one needs to be careful because a few from the other side or just trouble makers out for a “good time” could join the protest and become violent, bringing a bad name to peaceful people who may have what they think is a legitimate reason to protest.




jlf1961 -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 7:10:55 PM)

Free Speech Defined:

Conservative political candidate calling for armed revolution if Black Democrat president re elected= Free Speech

Tea Party members disrupting town hall meeting held by democrat congressman = Free Speech

Liberals disrupting town hall held by Republican congressman = rioting, etc.

Real definition of the above: Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old.




Milesnmiles -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 7:17:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Free Speech Defined:

Conservative political candidate calling for armed revolution if Black Democrat president re elected= Free Speech

Tea Party members disrupting town hall meeting held by democrat congressman = Free Speech

Liberals disrupting town hall held by Republican congressman = rioting, etc.

Real definition of the above: Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old.
Depending on where and when, even "Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old" can be considered free speech.

It is up to those with a little common sense how much weight to give them.
;-)




Aylee -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 7:42:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles
Public protest is a form of free speech, no matter which side you are on but it seems that you are saying that it is only free speech when it agrees with you.
;-)

The heckler's veto and the thug's veto are forms of censorship. Censorship is suppression of free speech. Free speech is enshrined in the Constitution.

And before I get comments about the 1st Amendment only referring to government suppression of speech: Yes, private citizens and institutions are bound to respect your rights. If you are speaking, no one has a right to assault you or those who want to hear you. Chanting to disrupt you might well fall under "breach of peace." And there is federal law about conspiring to interfere with civil rights.

Thank you for your intelligent and well phrased comment.

And no, I was not going to say anything about “the 1st Amendment only referring to government suppression of speech”.

What I was saying is free speech is not always easily recognized.

If you come on two people arguing and yelling at each other, each one could be considered to be trying to suppress the free speech of the other, whether they realize it or not. What to do about it? Do you join one of the two sides and start yelling because you agree with that side? Or do you realize that both have the right to free speech and walk away or at least try to calm the situation down to where communication can take place?


If they are not using "fighting words," swearing, or shoving and hitting each other, I will leave them alone because it is none of my business. I am not Mrs. Kravitz there is not reason to be involved if their are no safety issues. If they were swearing and children were with me, I might say something about that, depending on where I was at compared to them. Across the street or parking lot? Ignore them. At a store's entrance? Yep. I am gonna say something. Obscenities are not Constitutionally protected speech.

quote:

As for the case of the gentleman speaker and the protesters in the hall. They should have been asked to leave and if they didn’t they should have been removed and placed outside, where they could have had access to free speech to their hearts content. In this case, no matter how hateful the speech they thought was going on inside, they did not have the authority to disrupt it inside the hall where it was happening.


And this is one of the problems. Left-leaning institutions are NOT removing the heckler's veto from the venue. With the Milo incident, Berkley charged Milo for extra security and then did not provide it. I am pretty sure that is breech of contract. Regardless, it gives approval to the shutting down of free speech which is censorship.

quote:

Of course, violence is another story and is not free speech and should be dealt with by law enforcement.


But it is NOT being dealt with by law enforcement. Law enforcement stands aside or is told to stand down. Does the phrase, "Let them have room to destroy," ring any bells? Arrests are not being made for attacks on people. People are applauding violence. Do you recall the "Punch a Nazi" thing? That is actually suggesting that people use physical violence against thoughts they do not like. A serious violation of the social contract.

So overall, you have the left and lefty institutions aiding and abetting in the suppression of free speech. And using violence to accomplish it.
quote:

But even then, one needs to be careful because a few from the other side or just trouble makers out for a “good time” could join the protest and become violent, bringing a bad name to peaceful people who may have what they think is a legitimate reason to protest.


Those who come to the left's peaceful protests and use the heckler's veto or the thug's veto, are what I would call the alt-left. Actually, I prefer the term the Ctrl-left.

Now the left certainly does not call them out for their violence and destruction. They applaud them. They desire to emulate them. They envision themselves as "This Resistance" from Les Mis. I keep expecting to hear:

Arise children of the fatherland
The day of glory has arrived
Against us tyranny's
Bloody standard is raised
Listen to the sound in the fields
The howling of these fearsome soldiers
They are coming into our midst
To cut the throats of your sons and consorts
To arms citizens Form your battalions
March, march
Let impure blood
Water our furrows

As a historical note, the June Rebellion did not turn out so well. Well, really, the French do not do revolution very well. It tends to end in mass slaughter.

If the left really does not like the tactics it appears the ctrl-left is using, then it needs to denounce them and prevent them. They need to police their own. But they have chosen not to. So they own the violence at their protests and they own the violence that will eventually come from the other side.




Aylee -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 7:55:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Free Speech Defined:

Conservative political candidate calling for armed revolution if Black Democrat president re elected= Free Speech

Tea Party members disrupting town hall meeting held by democrat congressman = Free Speech

Liberals disrupting town hall held by Republican congressman = rioting, etc.

Real definition of the above: Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old.



If Obama had been re-elected I would call for an armed revolution. That would be a direct violation of the US Constitution and I took an oath to the defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

I have not heard anything about the republicans or Tea Party members disrupting town halls lately. I do know that all sorts of town hall meetings have been canceled lately.

I also know that fake town halls are being scheduled for the GOP so that the left can call them cowards.




jlf1961 -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/12/2017 8:54:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Free Speech Defined:

Conservative political candidate calling for armed revolution if Black Democrat president re elected= Free Speech

Tea Party members disrupting town hall meeting held by democrat congressman = Free Speech

Liberals disrupting town hall held by Republican congressman = rioting, etc.

Real definition of the above: Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old.



If Obama had been re-elected I would call for an armed revolution. That would be a direct violation of the US Constitution and I took an oath to the defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

I have not heard anything about the republicans or Tea Party members disrupting town halls lately. I do know that all sorts of town hall meetings have been canceled lately.

I also know that fake town halls are being scheduled for the GOP so that the left can call them cowards.



I was referring to the 2010 midterms election you twit. source

But it was actually about Harry Reid of Nevada.

And I see you have conveniently forgotten the tea party disrupting town hall meetings during the Obama care debate. source

Why is it that many conservative members on this board seem to have the memory span of a gold fish?




Milesnmiles -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 1:37:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
If they are not using "fighting words," swearing, or shoving and hitting each other, I will leave them alone because it is none of my business. I am not Mrs. Kravitz there is not reason to be involved if their are no safety issues. If they were swearing and children were with me, I might say something about that, depending on where I was at compared to them. Across the street or parking lot? Ignore them. At a store's entrance? Yep. I am gonna say something.

Thanx for answering a basically rhetorical question and doing so ignoring the question at hand, which is what is free speech.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Obscenities are not Constitutionally protected speech.

That too is a subject of debate, since no one is quite sure what obscenity really is.

Myself, I believe most rap “songs” obscene but someone must feel they are protected by free speech.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
And this is one of the problems. Left-leaning institutions are NOT removing the heckler's veto from the venue. With the Milo incident, Berkley charged Milo for extra security and then did not provide it. I am pretty sure that is breach of contract. Regardless, it gives approval to the shutting down of free speech which is censorship.
Perhaps if Milo sued them over this “breach of contract” there would less of it happening. So, to me, “Right-leaning Milo” also seems to have a hand in this “shutting down of free speech which is censorship.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
But it is NOT being dealt with by law enforcement. Law enforcement stands aside or is told to stand down. Does the phrase, "Let them have room to destroy," ring any bells?

Again my personal opinion in the matter was that they should have declared a curfew and enforced it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Arrests are not being made for attacks on people.

They should be.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
People are applauding violence.

I’m not.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Do you recall the "Punch a Nazi" thing? That is actually suggesting that people use physical violence against thoughts they do not like. A serious violation of the social contract.

No I didn’t and had to look it up.
Even though Mr. Spencer, himself said: “he thought the attack happened, in part, because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
“There was an actual anti-fascist rally going on, and I walked into it,””.

Even then, I would say violence was uncalled for and illegal.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
So overall, you have the left and lefty institutions aiding and abetting in the suppression of free speech. And using violence to accomplish it.

I seem to recall seeing someone disturbing a Trump convention and as he was being removed a man stood up and punched him, what do you suppose happened to that man, was he arrested and now in jail for assault and battery?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Those who come to the left's peaceful protests and use the heckler's veto or the thug's veto, are what I would call the alt-left. Actually, I prefer the term the Ctrl-left.

I guess you can call them whatever you want to but thugs and hecklers seems to work for me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Now the left certainly does not call them out for their violence and destruction. They applaud them. They desire to emulate them.

Well I’m not left or right but I certainly call anyone out for violence and destruction whether from the left or the right. I certainly do not applaud violence and destruction and have no desire to emulate them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
They envision themselves as "This Resistance" from Les Mis. I keep expecting to hear:

Arise children of the fatherland
The day of glory has arrived
Against us tyranny's
Bloody standard is raised
Listen to the sound in the fields
The howling of these fearsome soldiers
They are coming into our midst
To cut the throats of your sons and consorts
To arms citizens Form your battalions
March, march
Let impure blood
Water our furrows

As a historical note, the June Rebellion did not turn out so well. Well, really, the French do not do revolution very well. It tends to end in mass slaughter.

Not that I approve but history shows that when people are starving and watching their children starve they can act very unkindly toward those they think are causing it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
If the left really does not like the tactics it appears the ctrl-left is using, then it needs to denounce them and prevent them. They need to police their own. But they have chosen not to. So they own the violence at their protests and they own the violence that will eventually come from the other side.

Likewise, for the Right.

Speaking of that, what ever happened to Joe Wilson for interrupting a speech by U.S. President Barack Obama to the joint session of Congress by shouting "You lie!"?




jlf1961 -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 2:18:05 AM)

Aylee, you and many of those who are pushing this crap are, to use the most polite term, hypocrites.

To prove my point:
Trump Tells Crowd to ‘Knock the Crap Out’ of Protesters, Offers to Pay Legal Fees

Trump's endorsement of violence reaches new level: He may pay legal fees for assault suspect

Trump on rally protester: ‘Maybe he should have been roughed up’

Mashup of Trump praising violence against protesters

And these were peaceful protestors that he was advocating the use of violence against.

So here you folks are, screaming the left is trying to shut down free speech, and we have video of Trump telling his supporters to assault people who were peacefully trying to practice that right.

ON FUCKING VIDEO no less.

And not once did President Trump condemn those who assaulted protestors at his rallies, but instead praised them.

And you have the nerve to criticize liberals for not condemning the same sort of bullshit?

You cannot expect the Democrats or the left to uphold a higher standard than your own leader does, and then condemn them for failing to do so.

President Donald Trump set the standard and bar for this.




Musicmystery -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 5:43:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Free Speech Defined:

Conservative political candidate calling for armed revolution if Black Democrat president re elected= Free Speech

Tea Party members disrupting town hall meeting held by democrat congressman = Free Speech

Liberals disrupting town hall held by Republican congressman = rioting, etc.

Real definition of the above: Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old.



If Obama had been re-elected I would call for an armed revolution. That would be a direct violation of the US Constitution and I took an oath to the defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

I have not heard anything about the republicans or Tea Party members disrupting town halls lately. I do know that all sorts of town hall meetings have been canceled lately.

I also know that fake town halls are being scheduled for the GOP so that the left can call them cowards.



I was referring to the 2010 midterms election you twit. source

But it was actually about Harry Reid of Nevada.

And I see you have conveniently forgotten the tea party disrupting town hall meetings during the Obama care debate. source

Why is it that many conservative members on this board seem to have the memory span of a gold fish?

GOP leaders not meeting with their constituents is just not doing their jobs. I applaud the ones who said so and held meetings.

Those who don't agree can look for new jobs in 2018.




BoscoX -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:04:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Free Speech Defined:

Conservative political candidate calling for armed revolution if Black Democrat president re elected= Free Speech

Tea Party members disrupting town hall meeting held by democrat congressman = Free Speech

Liberals disrupting town hall held by Republican congressman = rioting, etc.

Real definition of the above: Childish temper tantrums more in tune of a 2 year old.



If Obama had been re-elected I would call for an armed revolution. That would be a direct violation of the US Constitution and I took an oath to the defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

I have not heard anything about the republicans or Tea Party members disrupting town halls lately. I do know that all sorts of town hall meetings have been canceled lately.

I also know that fake town halls are being scheduled for the GOP so that the left can call them cowards.



I was referring to the 2010 midterms election you twit. source

But it was actually about Harry Reid of Nevada.

And I see you have conveniently forgotten the tea party disrupting town hall meetings during the Obama care debate. source

Why is it that many conservative members on this board seem to have the memory span of a gold fish?


Huffpo, ThinkProgress... Talking Points memo? You are literally, trying to use an alt left talking points blog, as a "news source"?

Nothing in any of your extremely biased "news articles" shows the TEA party as a whole doing anything like Obama's "Organizing For Action" group (and others) are doing today

Not even a nice try, all you did is prove once again that you are an idiot who cannot see beyond his own nose

From your Huffpo link: "We are trying to get into that town halls to make them understand that they do not have the unanimous support from people in their communities."

Oh the fucking horror you poor little man, those mean TEA Party groups wanted to talk and discuss. ONE of them, one small group, a REAL grass roots group, advocated yelling

ONE person, a nobody, suggested that Harry Reid should be shot

When we just had Madonna on national TV advocating blowing up the White House, and everything else. Real nationally organized, nationally orchestrated violence and disruptions taking place, much of it by PAID leftists at some levels

The TEA Party is / was real grass roots. You shit breathing clown freaks are Sorosbots, whether you realize it or not

[image]http://minyos.its.rmit.edu.au/aim/a_notes/p_anims/puppet_anim.gif[/image]





BoscoX -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:06:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

GOP leaders not meeting with their constituents is just not doing their jobs. I applaud the ones who said so and held meetings.

Those who don't agree can look for new jobs in 2018.


Alt left rioters work to make the town halls of the nation dangerous to attend, then mock the intelligent for staying away




BoscoX -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:09:28 AM)

The top Google search results for "town hall violence"

Rep. Mo Brooks: No town halls planned because of violence, property ...
www.al.com/news/huntsville/index.ssf/.../rep_mo_brooks_no_town_halls_pl.html
Feb 24, 2017 - U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks has no plans to hold public town hall meetings, he said, because of concerns about violence that has occurred at other ...

Sessions: There's a Dangerous New Trend of Violence in ... - Townhall
https://townhall.com/.../sessions-theres-a-danger-new-trend-of-violence-in-america-n2...
Feb 28, 2017 - While crime in the U.S. has sharply fallen throughout the past four decades, Sessions said there are signs of an upswing in violence.

Barbarians at the Gate: Town Halls Under Siege - Jeff Crouere
https://townhall.com/.../02/.../barbarians-at-the-gate-town-halls-under-siege-n2290393
Feb 25, 2017 - Gohmert said that the protesters were “from the more violent strains of the leftist ideology, some are even being paid, who are preying on public ...




Musicmystery -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:11:56 AM)

Yep, it's an ambush--we're waiting there with our militias, ready to gun 'em down.

Then we're coming for the people who voted for them, except the few we keep to chain as forced labor.

The grandmothers we just knock down and stomp. Soros pays us extra for grandmothers.

Fortunately, the mess of vacancies McConnell has created in the judiciary will easily let us institute Sharia Law judges.

Then we open the borders wide, and shuffle all the white males onto reservations.





BoscoX -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:16:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Yep, it's an ambush--we're waiting there with our militias, ready to gun 'em down.

Then we're coming for the people who voted for them, except the few we keep to chain as forced labor.

The grandmothers we just knock down and stomp. Soros pays us extra for grandmothers.

Fortunately, the mess of vacancies McConnell has created in the judiciary will easily let us institute Sharia Law judges.

Then we open the borders wide, and shuffle all the white males onto reservations.




We have seen the videos of the bloodied and beaten, troll, so save your spew. Women being pepper sprayed, arson, organized mobs threatening and committing violence

There have been mobs outside of politicians' homes, where their families live

You think you are slick but this is all being noticed. The people going to the townhalls are the likely voters, and they know what is going on




Musicmystery -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:19:56 AM)

I just bought big into pepper futures.

Yep, our liberal mobs are marching down the streets, burning, shooting, looting, raping, pillaging . . . Like our Viking ancestors.

There will be no politicians left -- problem solved. We'll dwarf that silly French Revolution amateur day!

Town halls are just the start.

We're coming for you. We'll pepper spray ya, baby! Ha! Take that!




Lucylastic -> RE: The ACLU Is Now Training Rioters (3/13/2017 6:24:01 AM)

violent snowflakes.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875