Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Judge says no to Travel Ban V2.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 5:20:58 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-travel-ban.html

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Latest Travel Ban Nationwide
A federal judge in Hawaii issued a nationwide order Wednesday evening blocking President Trump’s ban on travel from parts of the Muslim world, dealing a political blow to the White House and signaling that proponents of the ban face a long and risky legal battle ahead.

The ruling was the second frustrating defeat for Mr. Trump’s travel ban, after a federal court in Seattle halted an earlier version of the executive order last month. Mr. Trump responded to that setback with fury, lashing out at the judiciary before ultimately abandoning the order.

He issued a new and narrower travel ban on March 6, with the aim of pre-empting new lawsuits by abandoning some of the most contentious elements of the first version.

But Mr. Trump evidently failed in that goal: Democratic states and nonprofit groups that work with immigrants and refugees raced into court to attack the updated order, alleging that it was a thinly veiled version of the ban on Muslim migration that he had pledged to enact last year, as a presidential candidate.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What now?



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 5:26:13 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
We follow the Constitution?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 5:42:27 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Democratic states and nonprofit groups that work with immigrants and refugees raced into court to attack the updated order, alleging that it was a thinly veiled version of the ban on Muslim migration [sic] that he had pledged to enact last year, as a presidential candidate.

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

K.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 6:01:48 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Democratic states and nonprofit groups that work with immigrants and refugees raced into court to attack the updated order, alleging that it was a thinly veiled version of the ban on Muslim migration [sic] that he had pledged to enact last year, as a presidential candidate.

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

K.



yes that alone invalidates the entire thread.


Edited to add snipped from updated CNN for Trumps response so far.

Trump decried the ruling during a rally Wednesday night in Nashville, introducing his statement as "the bad, the sad news."
"The order he blocked was a watered-down version of the first one," Trump said, as the crowd booed the news.
"This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach," he added, before pledging to take the issue to the Supreme Court if necessary.
The practical effect of the ruling -- which applies nationwide -- is that travelers from six Muslim-majority countries and refugees will be able to travel to the US.
Unlike the previous executive order, the new one removed Iraq from the list of banned countries, exempted those with green cards and visas and removed a provision that arguably prioritizes certain religious minorities.
The new ban was announced earlier this month and was set to take effect Thursday. It would have banned people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the US for 90 days and all refugees for 120 days.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/15/politics/travel-ban-blocked/

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 3/15/2017 6:09:21 PM >


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 6:59:44 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

Sure, you keep telling yourself that.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 7:01:57 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
What now?

Removing judges?

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 7:05:45 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Democratic states and nonprofit groups that work with immigrants and refugees raced into court to attack the updated order, alleging that it was a thinly veiled version of the ban on Muslim migration [sic] that he had pledged to enact last year, as a presidential candidate.

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

K.



Not according to the courts. Again.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 8:08:25 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Democratic states and nonprofit groups that work with immigrants and refugees raced into court to attack the updated order, alleging that it was a thinly veiled version of the ban on Muslim migration [sic] that he had pledged to enact last year, as a presidential candidate.

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

Not according to the courts. Again.

Yeah, food for thought there.

K.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/15/2017 10:23:03 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Democratic states and nonprofit groups that work with immigrants and refugees raced into court to attack the updated order, alleging that it was a thinly veiled version of the ban on Muslim migration [sic] that he had pledged to enact last year, as a presidential candidate.

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

Not according to the courts. Again.

Yeah, food for thought there.

K.



How do we vet every judge to make sure they haven't been bribed or are under some type of influence?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 1:24:12 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Evidently, this Hawaiian judge, in making his ruling, used President Trump's own words from the campaign trail against him, which does make the ban based in religion.

Not to mention this
quote:

The lawsuits also cited Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who advises Mr. Trump. Mr. Giuliani said he had been asked to help craft a Muslim ban that would pass legal muster.
source


Trump said repeatedly during his campaign he would "ban Muslims from entering the United States."

He also said he would direct the Justice Department to put all Mosques and Muslim community centers under surveillance because "they know who the terrorists are that are in this country."

And while he has not attempted the second of his campaign promises focused on Muslims in the United States, his repeated demonizing of the faith has, at least in the eyes of some crossed the line to the executive branch either overtly or covertly attempting to circumvent the first amendment.

Do you not find it strange U.S. Hate Crimes Up 20 Percent in 2016, Fueled by Election Campaign?

A trend that has continued to rise since his election with the targets being both Muslim and Jewish in nature?

And, point of fact, none of the refugees admitted from any of the countries in question have been involved in domestic terrorism, and those Muslims that have been involved in domestic terrorist acts became radicalized after living in the United States for a number of years.

While I agree that visas issued to people from ALL Muslim countries requires some deeper scrutiny than those from other countries, and I would extend that to any Muslim from any country where terrorist acts have been committed outside those countries of predominately Muslim population (lets face it, the men involved in the 9/11 attacks were from Saudi Arabia, and on the watch lists of the time, and they were repeatedly allowed to enter the US to attend flight schools) an outright ban from Muslim countries is over kill.

Especially from a president who was elected on his Anti Muslim rhetoric and sound bites. His campaign statements did suggest that, in the specific religious belief of Islam, he was going to do anything to restrict the freedoms of those of Muslim faith.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 1:31:32 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

Sure, you keep telling yourself that.

Yep. It's just a coincidence that it all the countries the ban applies to are Muslim countries. Nor should anyone make any connection between this travel ban and Trump's repeated election promises to ban Muslim immigration. That's just another coincidence.

_____________________________



(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 2:24:32 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, it isn't now and never was a ban on Muslim immigration.

Sure, you keep telling yourself that.

There are 32 countries with 90%+ Muslim populations, 26 of which (along with all the other countries with significant Muslim populations) enjoy no ban. To call that a "ban on Muslim immigration" is the functional equivalent of running around loose in a clown suit.

K.

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 3:18:33 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Evidently, this Hawaiian judge, in making his ruling, used President Trump's own words from the campaign trail against him, which does make the ban based in religion.

Not to mention this
quote:

The lawsuits also cited Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who advises Mr. Trump. Mr. Giuliani said he had been asked to help craft a Muslim ban that would pass legal muster.
source


Trump said repeatedly during his campaign he would "ban Muslims from entering the United States."

He also said he would direct the Justice Department to put all Mosques and Muslim community centers under surveillance because "they know who the terrorists are that are in this country."

And while he has not attempted the second of his campaign promises focused on Muslims in the United States, his repeated demonizing of the faith has, at least in the eyes of some crossed the line to the executive branch either overtly or covertly attempting to circumvent the first amendment.

Do you not find it strange U.S. Hate Crimes Up 20 Percent in 2016, Fueled by Election Campaign?

A trend that has continued to rise since his election with the targets being both Muslim and Jewish in nature?

And, point of fact, none of the refugees admitted from any of the countries in question have been involved in domestic terrorism, and those Muslims that have been involved in domestic terrorist acts became radicalized after living in the United States for a number of years.

While I agree that visas issued to people from ALL Muslim countries requires some deeper scrutiny than those from other countries, and I would extend that to any Muslim from any country where terrorist acts have been committed outside those countries of predominately Muslim population (lets face it, the men involved in the 9/11 attacks were from Saudi Arabia, and on the watch lists of the time, and they were repeatedly allowed to enter the US to attend flight schools) an outright ban from Muslim countries is over kill.

Especially from a president who was elected on his Anti Muslim rhetoric and sound bites. His campaign statements did suggest that, in the specific religious belief of Islam, he was going to do anything to restrict the freedoms of those of Muslim faith.



Its not just trumps words, its Guilianis and Millers words as well

Watson wrote in his order. “The Government need not fear. The remarkable facts at issue here require no such impermissible inquiry. For instance, there is nothing ‘veiled’ about this press release: ‘Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.’”

Nor is there anything “secret” about the Executive’s motive specific to the issuance of the Executive Order: Rudolph Giuliani explained on television how the Executive Order came to be. He said: “When [Mr. Trump] first announced it, he said, ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.’”

On February 21, 2017, commenting on the then-upcoming revision to the Executive Order, the President’s Senior Adviser, Stephen Miller, stated, “Fundamentally, [despite “technical” revisions meant to address the Ninth Circuit’s concerns in Washington,] you’re still going to have the same basic policy outcome [as the first].”

These plainly-worded statements, made in the months leading up to and contemporaneous with the signing of the Executive Order, and, in many cases, made by the Executive himself, betray the Executive Order’s stated secular purpose. Any reasonable, objective observer would conclude, as does the Court for purposes of the instant Motion for TRO, that the stated secular purpose of the Executive Order is, at the very least, “secondary to a religious objective” of temporarily suspending the entry of Muslims.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 3:26:13 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its not just trumps words, its Guilianis and Millers words as well...

The only thing that matters is the wording of the Executive Order itself.

K.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 3:38:39 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
take it up with the judge.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 4:28:51 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

take it up with the judge.

Well I don't have standing, but I'm sure it's going to be.

K.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 5:21:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its not just trumps words, its Guilianis and Millers words as well...

The only thing that matters is the wording of the Executive Order itself.

K.



Really? Is that why so many 'conservative interpretation of the constitution' are so intent on changing the actual intent of the constitution with their fables and propaganda?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 5:22:16 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

take it up with the judge.

Well I don't have standing, but I'm sure it's going to be.

K.


All the way to the Supreme court, or until version 3 comes out?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 2:53:39 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

take it up with the judge.

Well I don't have standing, but I'm sure it's going to be.

K.



When it gets to the Supreme Court, alleged motive won't be considered. They will just look at the facts that these countries don't have an administrative infrastructure which the US can depend on to utilize to safely and confidently vet their citizens... as was determined by the Obama Administration.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. - 3/16/2017 2:55:54 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

take it up with the judge.


Yeah... I wonder who paid him.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Judge says no to Travel Ban V2. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.098