U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS

U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Real0ne -> U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/16/2017 9:05:12 PM)
This is real. When will we say, okay, this is the last straw. When our government is legally able to confiscate all our possessions and no one does anything about it, we have entered into martial law! There is no other way to put this. They now have tanks in the street and soldiers are surrounding you who live in the inner cities. When will you admit, we are under martial law? David Vose Published on Jul 18, 2016 Due process not required U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS

Termyn8or -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/16/2017 9:59:46 PM)
Old news. T^T

Real0ne -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/16/2017 10:39:57 PM)
ok so then what form of gubmint have we become since clearly its no longer constitutional?

Termyn8or -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 12:27:38 AM)
Pretty much money first. They are called rent seekers normally. Rent is called rentes in the Protocols. This government was debauched almost before the ink on the Constitution was dry. When did they "Alien and sedition act" happen ? It has all been a farce. It is a matter of who has privilege and who does not. If you are in the US we have that over the First Nation because of force. We have that over the southern states which tried to leave the union, for whatever reason. Force was applied. What we experience now is what the south went through but they had it worse. But the same people did it and the same people will continue to do it. Quite some time ago I offered up a solution to this but people rejected it. I will not go through all that again. There is only one solution and the really smart can figure it out. I know it and will support it. T^T

captive4ever -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 3:19:00 AM)
You realize the source of this so-called story is a complete nutcase....?

thompsonx -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 10:19:03 AM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne This is real. When will we say, okay, this is the last straw. When our government is legally able to confiscate all our possessions and no one does anything about it, we have entered into martial law! There is no other way to put this. They now have tanks in the street and soldiers are surrounding you who live in the inner cities. When will you admit, we are under martial law? David Vose Published on Jul 18, 2016 Due process not required Who created this law?

WickedsDesire -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 10:42:55 AM)
R1 Your brain was confiscated a long time ago and replaced with a stale jobbie or errant, howling, aspect.

Musicmystery -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 11:04:30 AM)
~FR~ The GOP "war on drugs" has been used to confiscate homes and assets of offenders for well over a decade now. Where ya been?

WickedsDesire -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 11:08:41 AM)
proceeds of crime "act" - yes we have that over here too MM but what has that got to do with R1 jobbie ploppings?

Real0ne -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 3:15:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire proceeds of crime "act" - yes we have that over here too MM but what has that got to do with R1 jobbie ploppings? had you read the post and watched the news report you would have known this is donw completely without due process, its what happens to any country who converts gubmint religion to law, in this case profits. [img]http://www.startrek.com/legacy_media/images/200303/tng-221-scheming-ferengi-qol-a/320x240.jpg[/img] dont forget to massage the lobes! [8\|]

MrRodgers -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 3:32:00 PM)
Yes, this is clearly unconstitutional and has been going on since the RICO Act. (WiKi) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), and is codified at 18 U.S.C. ch. 96 as 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968. G. Robert Blakey, an adviser to the United States Senate Government Operations Committee, drafted the law under the close supervision of the committee's chairman, Senator John Little McClellan. It was enacted as Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, and signed into law by Richard M. Nixon. While its original use in the 1970s was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its later application has been more widespread. Beginning in 1972, 33 states adopted state RICO laws to be able to prosecute similar conduct.

Hillwilliam -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 4:21:55 PM)
FR to the OP Where have you been for the past couple of decades?

Edwird -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 6:58:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yes, this is clearly unconstitutional and has been going on since the RICO Act. (WiKi) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), and is codified at 18 U.S.C. ch. 96 as 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968. G. Robert Blakey, an adviser to the United States Senate Government Operations Committee, drafted the law under the close supervision of the committee's chairman, Senator John Little McClellan. It was enacted as Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, and signed into law by Richard M. Nixon. While its original use in the 1970s was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its later application has been more widespread. Beginning in 1972, 33 states adopted state RICO laws to be able to prosecute similar conduct. But here's the difference: every administration has the power to enforce or not to whatever degree. RICO was intended for wealthy mobsters, not to be against parents or friends or the most minor dealers or customers. Marijuana was almost effectively legal under Carter. But then not much cash or houses to steal from that. Here comes Reagan to save the day. Republican's platform is that society is to be provided as financial prey to their donors. Make the laws tougher on black teens because it suits the donors who have an itching to make privatization of prisons a great financial benefit to them. So in any case the OP is crying about the results of Reagan in pushing the agenda of his masters, while now bleating that Trump is here to do every bit as much and worse. Yeah, not like we haven't seen this before.

Edwird -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 7:04:33 PM)
Unless they (by way of he) are playing for us to believe that somebody who has appointed people with the best record of predation upon society are here to 'change things.' If that in matter of degree, well surely that.

stef -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 7:04:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam FR to the OP Where have you been for the past couple of decades? He's been huffing chemtrails.

MrRodgers -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 7:07:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yes, this is clearly unconstitutional and has been going on since the RICO Act. (WiKi) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), and is codified at 18 U.S.C. ch. 96 as 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968. G. Robert Blakey, an adviser to the United States Senate Government Operations Committee, drafted the law under the close supervision of the committee's chairman, Senator John Little McClellan. It was enacted as Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, and signed into law by Richard M. Nixon. While its original use in the 1970s was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its later application has been more widespread. Beginning in 1972, 33 states adopted state RICO laws to be able to prosecute similar conduct. But here's the difference: every administration has the power to enforce or not to whatever degree. RICO was intended for wealthy mobsters, not to be against parents or friends or the most minor dealers or customers. Marijuana was almost effectively legal under Carter. But then not much cash or houses to steal from that. Here comes Reagan to save the day. Republican's platform is that society is to be provided as financial prey to their donors. Make the laws tougher on black teens because it suits the donors who have an itching to make privatization of prisons a great financial benefit to them. So in any case the OP is crying about the results of Reagan in pushing the agenda of his masters, while now bleating that Trump is here to do every bit as much and worse. Yeah, not like we haven't seen this before. Yea, so close to 40 years now and they don't even need a crime, just financial practices that catch their eye. Like a small business owner put out of business because of dozens of bank deposits just under the $10,000 reporting requirement...was reported anyway. The feds seized the bank accounts and 'arrested' the business and that was it. Owners (mom & pop) were 100% totally innocent of anything.

Edwird -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 7:37:17 PM)
None of this forfeiture and seizure crap even existed anywhere outside the mob until Reagan came along, that's the point. While at the same time forfeiture and seizure by the private sector run amok quite obviously doesn't trouble real zero at all. That was the whole point of deregulation of every sort that he promotes at every turn. His philosophical and ideological alliance is plain to see, here. The poor boy has been played like a puppet all his life, and keeps very busy trying to tie the string to as many others as he can. He has no clue who runs the government, as evidenced by his crying about everything as if it were actually the latter's fault.

Edwird -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/17/2017 10:44:38 PM)
PS It is not in the nature of most Republican politicians or many of their voters to accept responsibility for their own actions. The OP is a prime example of that. It's always somebody else's fault, especially those of lower and lowest income, because it's their fault for not signing up with Mary Kay or Amway rather than taking jobs which completely suck in every way for sake of matching predictability of pay check to predictability of rent and utility bills, even with the often attendant shortfall thereby. Double-whamied by "market failure" from both sides. Yes, I know it's not the same thing, not the perfect comparison, but I still find it instructive that the few most devout Muslims in my neighborhood at least take their prayer mats outside the back of the store to do their spiritual business while on break, whereas Protestant penchant for indiscretion and acquisition and irresponsibility is loudly farted 'in front of the store' by way of their "the poor want to be poor" mantra at every opportunity. And so the very real working poor are what's holding this country back, because the minimally interfering government won't allow them to be anymore poor than $1,000-2,000 above poverty level. How is the US supposed to get ahead with such restriction? Always bitching that the poor don't give them enough, because employers of the lowest element shouldn't be having to pay even minimum wage. That's just their way

Termyn8or -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/18/2017 4:27:01 AM)
quote: PS It is not in the nature of most Republican politicians or many of their voters to accept responsibility for their own actions. The OP is a prime example of that. Where the fuck did you come up with that ? The OP is against this shit which was a republican thing. Second of all, I don't see democrats owning up to their deeds either. All politicians are like that, but some people only see it in republicans. As long as people only see one side of things we are fucked. We will never have solidarity of any kind, we will not be able to make any effective changes to the government or society in general, or anything. Keep up the ignorance and things will stay the same. And if you like forfeiture, wait until they catch your kid in the garage with a joint and take your house away. It is totally unconstitutional but that's the way it is. Is that your fault ? Because your kid smokes a joint you lose your house ? What if you rent and the renter turns out to be a drug dealer, they board up your house, or used to. But it is pretty hard to evict people in some places. In fact they seized a motel just because one of the customers used the room for a drug deal. Was that their fault ? What the fuck do you want them to do, a background check for a motel room ? And what, if ever convicted they can't get a room and have to freeze outside ? Sure the OP is out of date, but this needs to be brought up from time to time. And remember, it can happen to you. Just get caught with a little too much cash on you and you go down. Hire a lawyer with no money, go ahead. See how far that goes. The government is a den of thieves. Even taxation, they are authorized to lay and collect taxes for needful things. Not to go to war for the oil companies. T^T

Real0ne -> RE: U S GOVERNMENT now CONFISCATING Homes, Cars and ASSETS (3/18/2017 12:48:00 PM)
Hillary was heard on an open mic to talk about how they put in 'their' people, on both sides of the ticket, as in you are either with us or against us criminals in chief, when you want to insure an election turnout. You get the same criminals, in a variety of flavors, and nothing wil ever be done about it.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625