RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it"

RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 2:51:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice No one does hissy fits better than the Tweeter in Chief. I beg to differ. The snowflake left has shown you to be wrong on this matter more than enough. the shitflake right is the ones who are standing there shivering in the garish light of day caught felchgobbling each other and russians. You retards cant hide whats in plain sight.

Nnanji -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 2:52:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice FR Andy Borowitz: "The White House had thought they had enough votes to replace Obamacare, but it turns out the person doing the math was Betsy DeVos." [:)] Lol, that's funny, mostly because it's the little minds on the left that project that image, but it's funny.

mnottertail -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 2:53:19 PM)
We laugh because its funny, we laugh because its true.

Musicmystery -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 3:24:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: smartsub10 I knew it. You knew it. We all knew it. It was so obvious this would happen. Trump can go fuck himself with his threats against the conservatives who kept pushing for the REPEAL promise that was made, that isn't how it works. Time to get back in touch with your base, Mr President Welcome to the reality -- Trump is not an honest man. You alt left radicals keep tripping over yourselves trying to claim that this is a lie, or that is a lie, while never proving a single lie ever That said, even if your lies had any basis in reality President Trump beats Hillary (who conspired with CNN and the DNC to cheat Bernie Sanders out of the Democratic nomination) in more ways than just the honesty department We don't march in lockstep under the banner of Dear Leader like the DemoKKKratiKKK party perhaps, but that's plenty okay with me. I like dissension and debate, we don't pepper spray women or beat old people who get out of line like you do That you can't admit he lied even when you call him out for lying is a conflict you'll have to resolve within yourself.

Musicmystery -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 3:28:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka I'm not really watching the details, but my dad said that they are literally trying to cut people's healthcare worth about $880 billion and cut rich peoples taxes by $886 billion. Ouch. Sounds like Ryan's work.

Lucylastic -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 3:32:15 PM)
Laughing at another of trumps lies...job one.. choker, couldnt close it. With his own side. Now what will happen with his friends (the insurance companies) for the next under the table deal. not that the repubs deserve any sympathy either, after how many years, they still failed dismally with their bill, over and over again campaign promises you say people care more about healthcare and the anger from this utter shit action is gonna hurt everyone on the right, in 18. ALtho I do with the freedom caucus genitalia fester. Their lack of humanity is astounding. This is the best thing Ive heard all day altho Nunes stepping on his cock yesterday was close. Maybe Scrotus WILL still surprise me and go for single payer or expand medicaid for all

dcnovice -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 3:32:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice No one does hissy fits better than the Tweeter in Chief. I beg to differ. The snowflake left has shown you to be wrong on this matter more than enough. Vive la difference! But really, it's hard to get snowflakier than a president sending his press secretary to scold the media about the size of inauguration crowds. Unless maybe it's asking folks at the National Prayer Breakfast to seek divine intervention for Celebrity Apprentice ratings. Or perhaps tweeting about a rap video parody. [8\|]

Musicmystery -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 3:37:37 PM)
Yeah, he gives unhinged a whole new bend.

Lucylastic -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 3:38:06 PM)
quote: Trump can go fuck himself with his threats against the conservatives who kept pushing for the REPEAL promise that was made, that isn't how it works. Time to get back in touch with your base, Mr President LMAO nooooo hes amazing, he is doing gods work, he is the best thing to happen to the US God Bless the Scrotus. Party before country, yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay this time, stupid might hurt. Good

dcnovice -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:18:33 PM)
FR As for a snowflaky hissy fit, it's hard to top the "War on Christmas." A Walmart cashier wished me "happy holidays!" I'm scarred for life!

bounty44 -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:26:24 PM)
almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.

tamaka -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:29:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.

BoscoX -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:29:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. They were elected to repeal it, that is what they need to do and then, and only then, get to work on repairing the damage that government interference in the free market has done to health care over the years

bounty44 -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:40:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise. two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition. the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare.

bounty44 -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:42:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. They were elected to repeal it, that is what they need to do and then, and only then, get to work on repairing the damage that government interference in the free market has done to health care over the years ive been hearing roughly that's supposedly the idea behind the stage 2 and stage 3 formulations...

tamaka -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:44:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise. two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition. the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare. Everyone should have the right to healthcare.

BoscoX -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:53:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise. two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition. the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare. Everyone should have the right to healthcare. And food, and housing, nice clothes, high speed Internet, public utilities, transportation, hair care professionals, mad money, pets... Everything that Chairman Mao promised, and more

tamaka -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:54:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise. two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition. the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare. Everyone should have the right to healthcare. And food, and housing, nice clothes, high speed Internet, public utilities, transportation, hair care professionals, mad money, pets... Everything that Chairman Mao promised, and more Balance.

dcnovice -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:56:36 PM)
quote: two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition. That makes sense in theory, but doesn't seem to be borne out in reality: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danmunro/2014/06/16/u-s-healthcare-ranked-dead-last-compared-to-10-other-countries/#9f2b632576fd http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/health-costs-how-the-us-compares-with-other-countries/ * * * Two personal notes from someone with a fair bit of experience with U.S. healthcare: (a) Today, I had to reschedule a much-needed CT scan at a (nongovernmental) hospital because my (nongovernmental) insurance company is still conducting "medical review" to decide if I need what my doctor prescribed. The review, I learned, can take 2-15 (!!) days. (b) Shopping by price, a key element of the free market, is much harder to do with healthcare than, say, groceries or cars.

BoscoX -> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" (3/23/2017 4:59:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too. anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge. You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise. two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition. the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare. Everyone should have the right to healthcare. And food, and housing, nice clothes, high speed Internet, public utilities, transportation, hair care professionals, mad money, pets... Everything that Chairman Mao promised, and more Balance. Okay, provide assistance to the most needy and fill gaps where private insurance fails. We are 20 trillion in debt. Just for fun, and to see how big that number is start counting now, and let us know when you get to 20 trillion

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875