Frog March Obama's Ass (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> Frog March Obama's Ass (3/23/2017 4:27:35 PM)

Potential 'smoking gun' showing Obama administration spied on Trump team, source says

The left doesn't require any real evidence before pronouncing guilt, this should be enough to arrest Obama and frog march his ass into his mugshot photo op eh [;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/23/2017 6:27:19 PM)

potential
LMFAO
he stepped on his dick big time, with the intelligence committee
its hilarious
just like your "lock him up" over the "wiretapping", and nothing of proof or backup from the Scrotus and 3 weeks of silence...."
you wish on a star little one, maybe you will get your unicorn




Lucylastic -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/23/2017 6:30:18 PM)

here is some other news you might want to squeal over.
FBI Reportedly Looking At Breitbart, InfoWars As Part Of Russia Probe

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/fbi-probing-infowars-breitbart-russia

The FBI’s Counterintelligence Division is looking into the role far-right news sites including Breitbart, InfoWars and the Kremlin-backed RT might have played in Russia’s influence campaign during the U.S. presidential election, McClatchy reported Monday.

Automated computer bots strategically deployed unabashedly pro-Trump articles, which often contained falsehoods, from those sites on social media at moments when Trump’s campaign was flagging, anonymous FBI sources told McClatchy. The probe reportedly is looking at whether those publications willingly coordinated with Russian operatives in promoting their stories.

The inquiry is part of the FBI’s comprehensive investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, which Director James Comey confirmed Monday is also looking into any potential ties between Trump’s campaign staffers and Russian officials.

The White House, Breitbart and the FBI declined McClatchy’s requests for comment.

There've been a number of investigations into how so-called “fake news” stories distorted the media narrative and fueled the spread of election-related conspiracy theories during the 2016 race, including in The Washington Post and BuzzFeed.



talk about self fulfilling prophesies,
LOL




Kirata -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/23/2017 8:07:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There've been a number of investigations into how so-called “fake news” stories distorted the media narrative and fueled the spread of election-related conspiracy theories during the 2016 race

Yeah really. Here's part of a transcript from another one.

Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?
Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
Gowdy: It was not true?
Comey: That's what I said.
Gowdy: OK. Well, I'm looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said "I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material." That is true?
Comey: There was classified information emailed.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true?
Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?
Comey: No. We found work related email, thousands, that were not returned.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account.
Comey: That's a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related emails in — on devices or in space. Whether they were deleted or when a server was changed out something happened to them, there's no doubt that the work related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
Comey: No.


Source

K.






Lucylastic -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/23/2017 8:59:20 PM)

nice squeal




JeffBC -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:07:02 AM)

What might be useful in these conversations is separating "the left" from "the Democratic Party". Heck, even Democrats do that nowadays. I'm a part of the left and I am not welcome in Democratic circles.

I agree that DEMOCRATS have gone batshit crazy with this Russia thing. Even worse, the craziness isn't accidental. It's a deliberate plan to court global thermonuclear war in order to reframe an election. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence. When I'm presented with such evidence I'll be happy to consider it. In the meantime, anyone who is critical of the US Government is, in Democratic eyes, a Russian stooge. Heck, that's even part of what Russia is accused of doing to "hack our elections". Yes, nowadays telling the truth is considered hacking.... if you're a Democrat.

The Democratic party is now wholly composed of neoliberals. The liberals have, for the most part, become independents. That's why you see the crashing numbers for the party coupled with the sweeping election losses. The bottom line is that the oligarchs only have so many votes themselves and their ability to buy them from "liberals" is drying up. The "Russians under the bed" thing is a neoliberal play which kills two birds with one stone if it succeeds.




Lucylastic -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:10:14 AM)

WHere are you checking your information about russia?





WhoreMods -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:13:02 AM)

Why the fuck would anybody need to spy on La Boheme's team? It makes so much fucking noise nobody has to bother.
Is the stupid cunt claiming he was spied on because Obama answered one of his tweets and so must have seen all of the drivel he was spouting on twitter while out electioneering or something?




JeffBC -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:31:07 AM)

Mostly foreign and alternate media sources. I take it as a given that absolutely nothing that appears in legacy media is presented in a way designed to educate me.

The other thing I'm checking though is the actual reports that are issued by the government. You'll note that so far, we have seen exactly one piece of "evidence" and it's weak as hell. We saw a fingerprint of some code that the IC thinks is Russian in origin. Of course, who developed that code originally doesn't have anything to do with who used it... as the most recent wikileaks demonstrates oh so clearly.

So at this point what I've got is an appeal to authority... the authority of the IC. Honestly, given how consistently the intelligence community has lied I'm afraid that they are going to have to "show me". In the mean time, all I see is political theater.... really REALLY dangerous political theater. I fault the Democratic party heavily for it's handling of both health care and the global financial crisis. But this Russia thing is starting to get to the top of my list of reasons to never vote for a Democrat. A willingness to court global destruction to win an election is just a bit too far for me.




Lucylastic -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:32:56 AM)

Fair enough, I cant disagree with you more, but...thank you.




Lucylastic -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:38:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

What might be useful in these conversations is separating "the left" from "the Democratic Party".

I would like it if people knew the difference between democrat, liberal, socialist and marxism etc etc
Its like calling the freedom caucus moderate




JeffBC -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:48:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
I would like it if people knew the difference between democrat, liberal, socialist and marxism etc etc
Its like calling the freedom caucus moderate

What I've learned is that first response of the establishment is to attempt to co-opt. So it hardly matters what labels you pick. They will be mangled just as "liberal" and "progressive" have been. Actually, I learned this lesson from BDSM and the "True Master" discussions. I learned you need to get past labels and look at the underlying reality. So in my mind the Democratic party stands for what they actually do:

The party of the 20% (ie, the party of the professional class -- certified and protected professionals like lawyers and doctors).
The party of continuous war (one might also mention, illegal war both by international and US law)
The party of domestic surveillance and it's corresponding reduction in the rule of law.
Most recently, the party that corrupted it's own primary.

I could go on, but those two things alone are in stark contrast to what the Democratic party has stood for in recent history. Yeah, I'm pretty much against war. I'm against the oligarchy. And I'm against most of the results of having our nation controlled by plutocrats brings (including global warming). Nowadays I'm a #Demexiter working hard to bring down the Democratic party. I do so because I'm liberal. I'm the old-school left that dislikes wars for profit and similar things. We are stuck in a two party system which means I have no real choice but to bring down the Democratic party in order to make room for some liberal party.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 10:50:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

Mostly foreign and alternate media sources. I take it as a given that absolutely nothing that appears in legacy media is presented in a way designed to educate me.

The other thing I'm checking though is the actual reports that are issued by the government. You'll note that so far, we have seen exactly one piece of "evidence" and it's weak as hell. We saw a fingerprint of some code that the IC thinks is Russian in origin. Of course, who developed that code originally doesn't have anything to do with who used it... as the most recent wikileaks demonstrates oh so clearly.

So at this point what I've got is an appeal to authority... the authority of the IC. Honestly, given how consistently the intelligence community has lied I'm afraid that they are going to have to "show me". In the mean time, all I see is political theater.... really REALLY dangerous political theater. I fault the Democratic party heavily for it's handling of both health care and the global financial crisis. But this Russia thing is starting to get to the top of my list of reasons to never vote for a Democrat. A willingness to court global destruction to win an election is just a bit too far for me.


Wow, very astute. I am not used to that from most here who lean left.

Thank you for contributing.




JeffBC -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 11:01:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Thank you for contributing.

You're welcome. For the most part I don't assume any sort of "astuteness" from anyone who identifies as a Democrat or Republican. If you're actually tracking the program then your realize that for the most part, whatever allegations you could make against one you can make against the other. If you're actually tracking the program you understand that there are no "journalists" in the US anymore -- or at least they don't work for legacy media. If you want to know anything you must check everything.

I just watched an interesting video from a guy talking about Obama's efforts in Syria. In short, it was a GWB moment... lying us into war. The guy was very, VERY credible and he was speaking music to my ears. Even so, I accept none of it and I'm in the process of going through the video claim by claim and backtracking to original source material to corroborate. The problem with that is that it's very labor intensive. They have entire squads of "Think tanks" and pundits to throw out bullshit and I have just me and a small handful of other semi-reliable people I've identified to untangle the propaganda.




thompsonx -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 11:46:32 AM)


ORIGINAL: JeffBC



I just watched an interesting video from a guy talking about Obama's efforts in Syria. In short, it was a GWB moment... lying us into war.

From 1776 until today, which war have we been in that we were not lied into?




JeffBC -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/24/2017 11:50:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: JeffBC



I just watched an interesting video from a guy talking about Obama's efforts in Syria. In short, it was a GWB moment... lying us into war.

From 1776 until today, which war have we been in that we were not lied into?

LOL, fair enough. Although I think I could draw a significant difference between the threat represented by Hitler and the one represented by Assad. I'd have to go look at the actual history in detail, but I think that at least SOME Of the supporting reasons for going to war in WW2 were legit. Our entire mideast strategy is a complete facade.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/29/2017 7:18:25 AM)

FR

Obama's rule changes opened door for NSA intercepts of Americans to reach political hands

http://circa.com/politics/barack-obama-changed-how-nsa-intercepts-of-americans-like-donald-trump-could-be-shared




mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/29/2017 7:52:58 AM)

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html?_r=0

Not millions of americans, hope you are doing your exercises so you can frog march with Il Douchovitch and keep felchgobbling your PutinJizz from him to the bitter end.





BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/29/2017 8:06:06 AM)

FR

quote:

What If George W. Bush Spied on Obama in 2008?

RUSH: So you know what the media soap opera script for today is? It is get rid of Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intel Committee. Now, I know this may get tiresome to some people, and I know that I oftentimes have to caution you that it requires repetition to really indel a point into people’s minds. But I cannot help but play the old game, what if this was Obama in this entire Devin Nunes and Russia and Trump intel story? For instance. Well, okay, let me set the table.

[image]https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Nunes-2.jpg[/image]

The Democrats want Nunes to recuse himself from the House Intelligence Committee. He’s the chairman. They want him to go because they think, because he went to the White House the day before he shared some intel data with Trump, that he was up there colluding with Trump, even though he’s denied it. Even though what he did was no big deal whatsoever, they’re trying to scandalize all Republican behavior and they want him to recuse himself, and they’re mounting pressure on Nunes to do this.

He says he’s not gonna do it, thank goodness. The Republicans have become known as the recusal party, so I’m glad that Nunes is hanging tough. But what if this were Obama? For instance, what if there was evidence that the Bush administration had sicced the FBI on the Obama campaign in 2008? Take everything that’s happened, move it to 2008 and change the players and we learn that George W. Bush had called up his buddies at the FBI and told them to start gathering information, wiretaps, whatever, intercepts on the Obama campaign and then the Obama transition.

And what if the Bush FBI and the Bush NSA had incidentally monitored the phone calls of Obama’s aides and even Obama himself? Meaning, what if the Bush people had targeted foreign bad actors and those bad actors happened to be in touch with members of the Obama transition tame, as is always the case, and so incidentally the Bush team picked up intel on some of the Obama people, for instance, like Eric Holder, who was going to be attorney general. Or if they had been spying on James Clapper, who was gonna head up the office of national intelligence.

Imagine if the Bush administration had been monitoring the phone calls of Obama’s aides, maybe even Obama himself. And what if that information was carefully preserved by the Bush administration and then shared with 16 other intelligence agencies around the world, including some of those run by foreign governments?

And what if some of the names of the Obama people were illegally unmasked, as Michael Flynn’s name has been? What if there were two months of stories in the New York Times and the Washington Post — I take it back — what if there were two months of stories on Fox News and here on this program reporting leaks, intelligence community detailing the actions taken by Obama administration and transition officials?

What if — let’s keep going — what if the head of the House committee investigating all of this were to come up with further evidence of this monitoring and this illegal unmasking and went up to Obama and then to the press with his news?

Do you think the media would be furious with that guy? Do you think the media would be demanding that he resign? Do you think the media would be ignoring the rest of the story? Do you think if any of this were reversed the media would be piling on Obama, demanding explanations of Obama, demanding that Obama aides resign, demanding that Obama aides recuse themselves?

Do you think the media would take up and defend the George W. Bush people for the leaking, defend the George Bush people for spreading intel over 16 agencies, do you think any of that would be happening? Do you think the media would be ignoring the story? Do you think the media would be ignoring any bit of intel produced that cast shadows over Obama transition and administration officials?

[image]https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Nixon650.jpg[/image]

No.

If all of this had happened in 2008 to Barack Obama, it would have been 100 times bigger than Watergate. It’s the only way to look at this. These people are literally out of their minds with hatred and opposition and disgust.

More




itsSIRtou -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (3/29/2017 8:19:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

The left doesn't require any real evidence before pronouncing guilt, this should be enough to arrest Obama and frog march his ass into his mugshot photo op eh [;)]



that people, is coming from THE alt-whiner who has been shown to be wrong 3 times this past week so bad that he had to bailout and start multiple threads... (like this one!) to cover for how fucked up his hero and favorite colon to lick rump is learning his bankruptcy business skills don't work on everyone.

hey boss-hoe! the farmers are still looking for u to be the post ur dumb as!! The post hole is gettn deeper for ya!!

since u forget ur head is the part with "stupid" tatoo'd on it.


ur collarchat group calls u "dumb as a post"


and this post makes it certifiable. lets see how this really stupid thread looks 3 years from now.

Not only will rump be the one getting a mug shot, but the place he's getting it for is the loony bin...

because rump goes insane from the polls saying he's never had approval ratings as high as Obama. (kinda like his under-attended inauguration!!)

Pence runs alone in 2020.... and loses.

in a Romney-like move, the repugs throw him under the bus for the loss 3 days after.

cant wait for boss-hoe to "maniacally" wet his pants now.... LOL!!






Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625