heavyblinker -> RE: The truth is depressing (3/25/2017 2:59:52 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JeffBC Exactly my point. Hillary is focused, competent, and intelligent. Even better, there's no need to manipulate her since she's already on-team with the plutocrats. Trump, also a plutocrat, is also on-team but a massive wild card because he's fundamentally unstable. Yes, but the instability doesn't threaten them, except in its potential to cause a nuclear holocaust or economic meltdown. Hillary was a neoliberal and would have made concessions sure, but she's also strong enough to make sure that the government didn't become a joke and still had some power. Even if two people have similar interests, there's a difference between a mutually advantageous relationship and master/slave. Hillary would have been the former, while Trump is the latter. My impression of the mainstream American left is that they have a yearning to push the USA closer to the social democracies of Europe. Keep the corporations strong and the economy stable, but deliver more of the proceeds back to the people, especially the people who need it the most. The mainstream right seems to think that taxes are the enemy and people should keep what they 'earn', and fuck the weak (unless they are well-paid white factory workers who lose their jobs). I don't think that Hillary would have ignored the Bernie supporters. She wouldn't have become one, but she would have recognized that they were significant in number and made concessions. Trump just wants to push everyone around, which is ridiculous because the only people who actually respect him are... well... you know. quote:
ORIGINAL: JeffBC The plutocrats have been waiting for nobody for at least 4 decades. They already completely control our government. Is Trump the worst thing in a long time? I'm still waiting to see if, on the whole, he's better than Obama. I think it's likely that he'll end up worse. But that's just the continuation of a long trend. Trump is Obama's legacy. Someone even worse will be Trumps. One wonders if the voters will ever care? I don't think Trump is exclusively Obama's legacy-- more like the legacy of every president since at least Reagan. He is Obama's legacy in the sense that Obama didn't bring the kind of radical changes that everyone was expecting, but my impression of him was that he was at least trying to build something he believed in. The problem is that people were expecting miracles because they don't understand how things work and think the solution is easy... and so when Trump comes along and tells them their hopeless mindless magical thinking is correct, they think 'finally'. They didn't seem to realize that the only reason Trump was telling them this was because he wants to be loved, not because he has any ideas about how to make it happen. Ultimately, he won't even care if he does anything... because we all know that he is incapable of accepting his own failures, and simply flies into a childish rage or just pretends it was actually a success. Except for himself, Trump doesn't believe in anything, including reality. But I agree-- the worst thing about Trump might not even be Trump himself, but the person who takes what he has legitimized even further. The thing is, it's also quite possible that this whole alt-right neo-/proto-fascist wave will totally implode after 4 years. Trump's biggest selling point in this election was that he was 'something new'... people thought they had nothing to lose. Trump could be the guy who slaps them across the face with his stupidity and reminds them that they do. The biggest threat now is probably Christian fascism. It's much more refined, much more disciplined... and it even comes complete with its own iconography and a much larger, much more mindlessly devoted fan base.
|
|
|
|