If there is nothing to hide....

If there is nothing to hide.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

jlf1961 -> If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 6:45:09 PM)
Why does he need immunity? http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-former-national-security-adviser-1490920862-htmlstory.html quote: In a statement, Flynn's lawyer, Robert Kelner, said "Gen. Flynn certainly had a story to tell and he very much wants to tell it, should the circumstances permit." "No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch-hunt environment without assurances from unfair prosecution." Trump fired Flynn three weeks into the new administration after news reports disclosed that he had lied to White House colleagues, including Vice President Mike Pence, about his contacts with Sergey Kislyak, Russia's ambassador to the U.S. I dont see any former Obama or Clinton aids asking for immunity....

Musicmystery -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 6:55:45 PM)
Sounds like Flynn is making a deal with the FBI.

BoscoX -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 6:59:47 PM)
Why did so many of Hillary's top staffers require immunity

vincentML -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 7:40:09 PM)
It has only just begun . . . drip . . . . . .drip . . . . . . . drip . . . Flynn knows . . . . . . . there is just no place to run . . . drip . . .drip . . . drip

Lucylastic -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 7:58:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Why did so many of Hillary's top staffers require immunity I dont believe any of them were national security adviser or kicked out of their jobs within 23 days.

Lucylastic -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:05:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: vincentML It has only just begun . . . drip . . . . . .drip . . . . . . . drip . . . Flynn knows . . . . . . . there is just no place to run . . . drip . . .drip . . . drip I love the smell of desperation in the morning, afternoon and evening drip drip drip has the makings of a tap tap tap joke ok maybe not

BoscoX -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:12:42 PM)
Duh - Hillary was unelectable Still, proves "guilt" for the pantsuit queen just as much as it does anybody else

Lucylastic -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:15:48 PM)
only in your tiny little brain cell gets lonely doesnt it

Lucylastic -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:20:33 PM)
how many of the "hillarys staff" offered to talk ???

BoscoX -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:22:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic how many of the "hillarys staff" offered to talk ??? I provided the link above, sweetheart Are you a natural blonde

jlf1961 -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:25:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic how many of the "hillarys staff" offered to talk ??? All staffers contacted answered questions WITHOUT demanding immunity, that was the FBI and justice department making the offer not responding to a demand for the immunity. Flynn is asking for it as a condition to appear before the committee. Somehow Bosco does not grasp the difference, and strangely enough the Trump administration does not seem to be about to offer it as an incentive. Stranger still.

BoscoX -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:28:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic how many of the "hillarys staff" offered to talk ??? All staffers contacted answered questions WITHOUT demanding immunity, that was the FBI and justice department making the offer not responding to a demand for the immunity. Flynn is asking for it as a condition to appear before the committee. Somehow Bosco does not grasp the difference, and strangely enough the Trump administration does not seem to be about to offer it as an incentive. Stranger still. Obama's crooked DOJ went around handing immunity out to Clinton people like it was play money See my link above if you can, blind man

Lucylastic -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:33:47 PM)
You still havent answered your own question, Why did so many of Hillary's top staffers require immunity Marc Rich is the only name in that, "perfect" link and Marc Rich has been dead for 3 years. Hillary staffers are NOT national security advisers. once again with the oranges and apples. not even a good try, but lets not focus on your bullshit

mnottertail -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:45:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Duh - Hillary was unelectable Still, proves "guilt" for the pantsuit queen just as much as it does anybody else So, since both Il Douchovitch and nutsucker comrade Flynn have said that immunity is for criminals, and your tu quoque comment, puts them heavy into the criminal class by your own logic and words. Da Svedanya nootzukorshkis! Even I not such communist. President Putin.

mnottertail -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:51:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic You still havent answered your own question, Why did so many of Hillary's top staffers require immunity Marc Rich is the only name in that, "perfect" link and Marc Rich has been dead for 3 years. Hillary staffers are NOT national security advisers. once again with the oranges and apples. not even a good try, but lets not focus on your bullshit I will also point out that Hillary testified without immunity for 11 hours, when Il Douchovitch does that, then the nutsucker felchgobbling will be less PutinJizzy around the edges.

Lucylastic -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:52:50 PM)
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn, reportedly seeking immunity in exchange for his testimony in investigations of Russia’s ties to Donald Trump’s campaign, said last year that such deals mean “you’ve probably committed a crime.” Flynn wasn’t even asked about immunity during his Sept. 25 appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Instead, he was asked about Trump’s debate preparation and whether it was enough. Instead, he chose to respond to something that apparently had been mentioned earlier in the show. “The very last thing that John Podesta just said is ‘No individual too big to jail.’ That should include people like Hillary Clinton,” he said. “I mean, five people around her have been given immunity, to include her former chief of staff.” Then, he said: “When you are given immunity, that means that you probably have committed a crime.”

mnottertail -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/30/2017 8:59:29 PM)
Trump said the same type of thing in a Florida rally.

Musicmystery -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/31/2017 4:31:26 AM)
So basically the defense against a pending storm of Russian links investigations is -- but Hilary? Sad.

mnottertail -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/31/2017 4:58:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic how many of the "hillarys staff" offered to talk ??? All staffers contacted answered questions WITHOUT demanding immunity, that was the FBI and justice department making the offer not responding to a demand for the immunity. Flynn is asking for it as a condition to appear before the committee. Somehow Bosco does not grasp the difference, and strangely enough the Trump administration does not seem to be about to offer it as an incentive. Stranger still. Obama's crooked DOJ went around handing immunity out to Clinton people like it was play money See my link above if you can, blind man Il Douches nutsucker crooked DOJ has people who are being investigated, and desperately and pantshittingly trying to figure out how to hand out immunity to themselves.

BoscoX -> RE: If there is nothing to hide.... (3/31/2017 5:16:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery So basically the defense against a pending storm of Russian links investigations is -- but Hilary? Sad. "Defense" against what? More "pending" nothingness You have been running around since the election, alt left trash has been insane since the election promising the end of the world. All through the election process it was the same, only different - "Trump can never win. Oh, this is the end for Trump." You are still at it, only more ridiculous than ever Defend against more hysterical nothing You claim that if someone associated with Trump asks for immunity that's the end, but it was a different story when the same sort of thing was swirling around your queen

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125