DaddySatyr -> RE: Syria Begins (4/8/2017 1:15:49 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyDemura Don't get me wrong, it seems a horrible way to die, and probably survive a moderate exposure, but so can be conventional weapons. It may just be me, but I'd rather have a bullet to the noodle and end it quickly than what NBC weapons can do. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyDemura I don't see why the use of these should change the strategic goals, especially since it's already well known he's used them before. Indeed! If only one of the world powers had sent him some indication that the use of chemical weapons (a war crime, by the way) would not be tolerated. You know ... if some world leader had drawn a red line in the sand and then, enacted some form of retribution, when that line was crossed. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyDemura I still think if he's not in power, ISIS, or some other organization like them will be. That is a legitimate concern. However, the truth is Assad is doing very little fighting against ISIS as opposed to fighting against the forces opposing him (which is why these civilians were targeted in this latest attack). That said, I oppose the US implementing regime change of its own volition. So, my plan would be: 1) Inform Assad that we're sending troops to kick the shit out of ISIS and we'll be there until Raqqa is secure. 2) Train Syrians in military weapons and tactics/strategy. One of the biggest problems is Assad can't get Syrians to fight for him, anymore so, he is employing Iranian, Iraqi, and Afghani mercenaries. Obviously, this force of mercs has also been infiltrated (in some strength level) by ISIS fighters/sympathizers. So, that doesn't bode well for (our) long-term strategy of destroying the Caliphate AND helping the Syrians oust their scumbag leader. Michael
|
|
|
|