vincentML
Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009 Status: offline
|
Any rerun process would require lengthy judicial procedures as happened in the 2000 election. We are not keen on having the Courts involved in our democratic process except to rule on fairness. Historically, we have had disputed elections, only one or two were determined by votes in the Congress. Several were concluded by losing candidate concession. Jack Kennedy for example was elected by the votes of several residents of the Chicago cemeteries and by the graceful concession of his opponent Richard Nixon. The only one that did not work out so well occurred in 1860 when there were four sectional political parties and we had run out of compromises on the slavery issue. There are only 20 days or so between the vote of the Electoral College and the inauguration of the new president. Usually, it runs smoothly. Needless to say this time it failed due to Trump's lack of experience and and the incompetence of his transition team. quote:
But there boiler room / fake profiles were ramming stories down American throats via flooding social media, alt news websites –many of these were guilty of lapping it up then regurgitating it back out to the sheople. That's down to Hillary and her campaign team. They should have been prepared to counter fake stories, and unfortunately she wrote off the white male labor class presenting herself as somehow entitled to be the first female president. quote:
But if you are telling me the duty falls, in theory, to the house of representatives, and not senate, then those elections should be rerun As I understand it, each state delegation in the House gets two extra votes to account for the senators. quote:
Ironically the Russians preferred candidate may turn out to be their biggest adversary, ever. Because he’s fuking nuts, and wildly unpredictable and rarey has a Scooby what he is on about. 
_____________________________
vML Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.
|