Who will lose his job first....

Who will lose his job first.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Sean Spicer

29% (5)

Bill O'Reilly

29% (5)

The Cleveland Browns starting QB

41% (7)

Total Votes : 17

(last vote on : 4/19/2017 12:15:58 PM)
(Poll ended: 4/30/2017 11:59:00 AM)

Message

DesideriScuri -> Who will lose his job first.... (4/12/2017 3:54:26 PM)
This was a Twitter poll a local afternoon drive radio host put up on his account. I thought it humorous, but still relevant to this Forum.

Musicmystery -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/12/2017 5:24:08 PM)
I'm guessing the only reason he's still there is that they can't find anyone foolish enough to take his place. He must have come into this life with some nasty karma.

MasterG2kTR -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/12/2017 6:02:33 PM)
damn.......those choices are like a mexican standoff

BamaD -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/12/2017 6:13:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR damn.......those choices are like a mexican standoff If he had a job he wouldn't be the Browns QB .

Hillwilliam -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/12/2017 6:18:01 PM)
If it was after labor day, I'd say the QB. As it is, the other 2 have such a huge head start. I'll say Bill O.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:16:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam If it was after labor day, I'd say the QB. As it is, the other 2 have such a huge head start. I'll say Bill O. What's funny, is that the poll sits now at 4-3-3, with the Browns QB losing his job first in the lead. The radio host's poll had the Browns QB losing at 65% a few hours after he put it up. I didn't figure the Browns QB situation would really be a choice on this messageboard. I think Spicer will lose his job first. I'm guessing Fox News will wait longer for an air-tight case against Bill before letting him go.

BoscoX -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:23:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri This was a Twitter poll a local afternoon drive radio host put up on his account. I thought it humorous, but still relevant to this Forum. Hillary Clinton will lose first, with Democrats in the media and on the streets losing their collective minds immediately afterward

thompsonx -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:24:52 AM)
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri What's funny, is that the poll sits now at 4-3-3, with the Browns QB losing his job first in the lead. The radio host's poll had the Browns QB losing at 65% a few hours after he put it up. I didn't figure the Browns QB situation would really be a choice on this messageboard. I think Spicer will lose his job first. I'm guessing Fox News will wait longer for an air-tight case against Bill before letting him go. The browns qb gets paid to produce touchdowns. Spicer gets paid to be the tackling dummy. Billy o could rape a nun in the vatican and the rabid right would applaud. The qb is the only one on the list who has to produce or get fired.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:35:27 AM)
The third reference I do not get. Where is my Trump option? Vindaloo Spicer nope - he was a good pick. I am not saying he wont have to fall on a sword for the orange wreckage

Musicmystery -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:37:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri This was a Twitter poll a local afternoon drive radio host put up on his account. I thought it humorous, but still relevant to this Forum. Hillary Clinton will lose first, with Democrats in the media and on the streets losing their collective minds immediately afterward But but but Hilary! Fake news!! Hysteria!!!!

Lucylastic -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:44:31 AM)
Hillobama the devilssssssssss

dcnovice -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:47:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Hillobama the devilssssssssss Some of our fellow posters could save themselves a lot of typing by simply putting "But Hillary... But Obama..." in their signatures. [:)]

dcnovice -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 8:48:33 AM)
quote: I didn't figure the Browns QB situation would really be a choice on this messageboard. Of this terrific trio, he's the only with actual performance expectations. [;)]

WhoreMods -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 9:11:27 AM)
Bit unfair on the American football player, that: he actually has a skillset and has put some effort into mastering his craft. However crap he is at AF, he can't be a more incompetent fuckweasel than the other two so long as he mostly runs in the right direction while he's on the pitch.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 9:32:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: I didn't figure the Browns QB situation would really be a choice on this messageboard. Of this terrific trio, he's the only with actual performance expectations. [;)] However, I'm not sure the Browns have even named their starting QB yet. quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Bit unfair on the American football player, that: he actually has a skillset and has put some effort into mastering his craft. However crap he is at AF, he can't be a more incompetent fuckweasel than the other two so long as he mostly runs in the right direction while he's on the pitch. The rumor is they traded for Brock Osweiler and a second round draft pick, and were going to immediately drop Osweiler. The NFL would look at that as buying a draft pick, which is a no no. That Osweiler would be signed to a stupidly huge contract one year, demonstrate he lacks the skills and talents to merit the contract, and was almost traded for and cut, shows that he just may be crap at AF (in relation to other QB's or QB wannabe's in the NFL; I mean, that he made it to the NFL demonstrates he was considered to have a better skillset than those who didn't make it into the NFL). In 2016, during free agency, Osweiler signed a $72M 4-year contract, with $37M guaranteed over the first two years. The trade with Cleveland was Osweiler and a 2nd round draft pick for... uh, the 2nd round draft pick was compensation to Cleveland for taking Osweiler and his contract. Cleveland, effectively, gave up nothing, but salary cap space, which they had in spades (they had the greatest amount of cap space of any NFL team). Osweiler will make $16M this year, even if he is sitting at home, unemployed by an NFL team.

WhoreMods -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 10:25:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: I didn't figure the Browns QB situation would really be a choice on this messageboard. Of this terrific trio, he's the only with actual performance expectations. [;)] However, I'm not sure the Browns have even named their starting QB yet. quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Bit unfair on the American football player, that: he actually has a skillset and has put some effort into mastering his craft. However crap he is at AF, he can't be a more incompetent fuckweasel than the other two so long as he mostly runs in the right direction while he's on the pitch. The rumor is they traded for Brock Osweiler and a second round draft pick, and were going to immediately drop Osweiler. The NFL would look at that as buying a draft pick, which is a no no. That Osweiler would be signed to a stupidly huge contract one year, demonstrate he lacks the skills and talents to merit the contract, and was almost traded for and cut, shows that he just may be crap at AF (in relation to other QB's or QB wannabe's in the NFL; I mean, that he made it to the NFL demonstrates he was considered to have a better skillset than those who didn't make it into the NFL). In 2016, during free agency, Osweiler signed a $72M 4-year contract, with $37M guaranteed over the first two years. The trade with Cleveland was Osweiler and a 2nd round draft pick for... uh, the 2nd round draft pick was compensation to Cleveland for taking Osweiler and his contract. Cleveland, effectively, gave up nothing, but salary cap space, which they had in spades (they had the greatest amount of cap space of any NFL team). Osweiler will make $16M this year, even if he is sitting at home, unemployed by an NFL team. So if he was involved a trade deal, he has a much more convincing claim to be worth his salary than Spicer or O'Reilly, then.

bondageerone -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/14/2017 10:50:05 AM)
DesS. so obviously you did not vote for DT.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/17/2017 2:52:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone DesS. so obviously you did not vote for DT. Correct, I did not vote for Trump. I supported Gary Johnson.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/17/2017 2:55:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Bit unfair on the American football player, that: he actually has a skillset and has put some effort into mastering his craft. However crap he is at AF, he can't be a more incompetent fuckweasel than the other two so long as he mostly runs in the right direction while he's on the pitch. The rumor is they traded for Brock Osweiler and a second round draft pick, and were going to immediately drop Osweiler. The NFL would look at that as buying a draft pick, which is a no no. That Osweiler would be signed to a stupidly huge contract one year, demonstrate he lacks the skills and talents to merit the contract, and was almost traded for and cut, shows that he just may be crap at AF (in relation to other QB's or QB wannabe's in the NFL; I mean, that he made it to the NFL demonstrates he was considered to have a better skillset than those who didn't make it into the NFL). In 2016, during free agency, Osweiler signed a $72M 4-year contract, with $37M guaranteed over the first two years. The trade with Cleveland was Osweiler and a 2nd round draft pick for... uh, the 2nd round draft pick was compensation to Cleveland for taking Osweiler and his contract. Cleveland, effectively, gave up nothing, but salary cap space, which they had in spades (they had the greatest amount of cap space of any NFL team). Osweiler will make $16M this year, even if he is sitting at home, unemployed by an NFL team. So if he was involved a trade deal, he has a much more convincing claim to be worth his salary than Spicer or O'Reilly, then. Not necessarily. If they accepted Osweiler's contract to get a 2nd round pick, then the 2nd Round pick was the actual desired part, and what they had to give up was taking Osweiler. To be fair, Osweiler did a fairly good job backing up Peyton Manning in Manning's final year. When Manning got hurt, Osweiler stepped in and didn't totally suck. By the end of the season, however, the Broncos decided that Manning, even with fingertips numb from nerve damage in his neck, was a better option than Osweiler.

MrRodgers -> RE: Who will lose his job first.... (4/17/2017 5:57:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR damn.......those choices are like a mexican standoff If he had a job he wouldn't be the Browns QB . But this is America, so the real accomplishment is when and if [he] is out of football...he'll have million$. For example Brock Osweiler now before taking a snap for the Browns, net worth...$20 million. So whatever job he has...he doesn't need. For another, RGIII net worth before joining the Browns: $13 million. Selling his house in Va. for $2.75 mill. So as always in America, you know, part of it's charming exceptionalism, it's not about football or about jobs...it's about money.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.0625