Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the past 500 years have waged war more often than kings


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the past 500 years have waged war more often than kings Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 3:45:20 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Qualitative vs quantitative research methods are not 'expert' level stuff Peon. Geeze.


Thank you for courage in contributing to this thread, tamaka. :)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 3:47:33 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Qualitative vs quantitative research methods are not 'expert' level stuff Peon. Geeze.


Thank you for courage in contributing to this thread, tamaka. :)


You're such a snob Peon.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 3:56:40 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

You're such a snob Peon.


Excellent. Thanks for that.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 3:58:58 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

You're such a snob Peon.


Excellent. Thanks for that.


Not really excellent at all Peon.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 4:06:22 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline 		I'm sorry that you feel that way, tamaka, but well done, anyway, for joining in on this subject.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 4:13:32 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I'm sorry that you feel that way, tamaka, but well done, anyway, for joining in on this subject.


I didn't join in on the subject. I made an observation of the incorrectly placed credibility you offered one of the participants.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 4:33:45 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph
Qualitative study - qualitative methods
Quantitative study - quantitative methods

Whether social or other sciences ...
This is getting fucking tedious. You clearly have a very poor understanding of the topic at hand.

Let's examine your failure:

You said: "A quantitative study for "proving" a qualitative theory."

You managed to get two things wrong in one with this sentence. Despite claiming to have read the paper, you didn't pick up the fact that the entire purpose of the paper was to examine the unproven general claim that women in power are less inclined to state-level conflict than men.

This fact could be gleaned by reading the opening paragraph of the abstract of the paper you claimed to have read, but clearly did not. I quote:

"A large scholarship claims that states led by women are less conflictual[sic] than states led by men. However, it is theoretically unclear why female leaders would favor more conciliatory war policies. And, it is empirically challenging to identify the e¤ect of female rule, since women may gain power disproportionately during periods of peace."

Second, claiming that women are more peaceful than men - in itself a claim about social psychology - can only be validated or proved through statistical analysis of empirical evidence. A qualitative approach to examining this claim would be unable to validate or disprove it. IE: It wouldn't work.

You are clearly a fucking moron.

Here's a handy guide to the difference between qualitative and quantitative research: https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html

Perhaps when you understand something of the topic, you'll be able to comment intelligently, but it would be phenomenonally unwise to bet on it, since you seem to have great difficulty grasping the simplest of concepts.

quote:

Learning what method makes sense for what research purpose is basic undergraduate level.
Ah, so you didn't graduate then. Now it all makes sense.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 4:35:49 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
A, please stop this. Just learn to stand back when you're in the presence of someone who actually knows the subject at hand at an expert level. You're tiring everybody out, for feck's sake.
Peon, you are now just making a fucking fool of yourself. Not only does she not understand the most basic difference between qualitative and quantitative research, but you have made it eminently clear that you are also similarly clueless.

Really, you're just embarrassing yourself now. "Open mouth/insert foot" seems to be your mantra for living.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 4:37:02 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
Qualitative vs quantitative research methods are not 'expert' level stuff Peon. Geeze.
Peon thinks anything involving math is "expert level stuff". That's what happens when someone spends the majority of their life counting on their fingers.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 5:45:07 PM   
blnymph


Posts: 1610
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

...

"A large scholarship claims that states led by women are less conflictual[sic] than states led by men. However, it is theoretically unclear why female leaders would favor more conciliatory war policies. And, it is empirically challenging to identify the e¤ect of female rule, since women may gain power disproportionately during periods of peace."

Second, claiming that women are more peaceful than men - in itself a claim about social psychology - can only be validated or proved through statistical analysis of empirical evidence. A qualitative approach to examining this claim would be unable to validate or disprove it. IE: It wouldn't work.


Women more peaceful than men? - qualitative
More women peaceful than men? - quantitative

Sorry I can not simplify the basic flaw more. Maybe now even you can grasp it.

A quantitative approach neither proves nor validitates anything here. It is based on nothing else but a collection of arbitrarily selected anecdotes.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 5:49:56 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph
Women more peaceful than men? - qualitative
More women peaceful than men? - quantitative
Wrong. You're an idiot.

quote:


Sorry I can not simplify the basic flaw more. Maybe now even you can grasp it.
I grasp your complete lack of understanding. In future, stick to subjects about which you can converse intelligently.

quote:

A quantitative approach neither proves nor validitates anything here. It is based on nothing else but a collection of arbitrarily selected anecdotes.
On the contrary, a quantitative approach is the only methodology which has even the remotest chance of success.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 6:14:58 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline 		Honestly the discussion is absurd because there are too many other factors involved to determine whether the premise is true or not.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 8:19:51 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		Speaking of which gender is more peaceful, feminists are usually aggressive and abusive towards others who support men's rights or has a non gynocentric opinion on gender issues.

Just look at all the abusive protests feminists have done against men's rights conferences. Even with the red pill screenings, the organisers have to create secret venues for the screenings to avoid feminists harassing staff and the people viewing it.

Where are men's rights activists doing such things to feminist conferences and video screenings?

This only seems to be a feminist thing. The men's rights movement seems to be way more peaceful and less abusive than the feminist movement.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the pas... - 5/3/2017 8:46:17 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Speaking of which gender is more peaceful, feminists are usually aggressive and abusive towards others who support men's rights or has a non gynocentric opinion on gender issues.

Just look at all the abusive protests feminists have done against men's rights conferences. Even with the red pill screenings, the organisers have to create secret venues for the screenings to avoid feminists harassing staff and the people viewing it.

Where are men's rights activists doing such things to feminist conferences and video screenings?

This only seems to be a feminist thing. The men's rights movement seems to be way more peaceful and less abusive than the feminist movement.


There aren't any men anymore.

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 54
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Don't mess with a queen! Female rulers over the past 500 years have waged war more often than kings Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078