Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run a Trump Campaign Ad


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run a Trump Campaign Ad Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run a T... - 5/5/2017 3:25:19 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run a Trump Campaign Ad

An ad touting President Donald Trump’s achievements in his first 100 days was rejected by CNN because it contained a graphic that accused the mainstream media of “fake news.” Subsequently, the head of Trump's re-election campaign accused CNN of "censorship" for refusing to run the ad.

The graphic ran the words "fake news" over photos of prominent journalists from major U.S. TV networks, including CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, George Stephanopoulos from ABC News, Scott Pelley from CBS, Andrea Mitchell from NBC News and MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow.

“CNN requested that the advertiser remove the false graphic that says the mainstream media is ‘fake news,’ reads a statement from CNN’s communications department. “The mainstream media is not fake news, and therefore the ad is false.”

CNN said it would run the 30-second TV spot if the graphic was deleted.

if he (a complete lying fuk) believes them to be fake news why is he running adverts on them?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 4:27:09 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire
if he (a complete lying fuk) believes them to be fake news why is he running adverts on them?

Because he apparently likes slapping pussies as much as grabbing them.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 7:45:55 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
FR,

Fake news or not, they have viewers and buying ad time on their network gets his ads in front of their viewers' eyes.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 7:59:20 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Good point Empowers him and makes him feel big - what height is the lying fuk anyway - 3 foot or something?


(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 11:11:25 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Good point Empowers him and makes him feel big - what height is the lying fuk anyway - 3 foot or something?



He hires Vern Troyer to make public appearances for him wearing a mask, as Troyer has a well documented big cock and hands.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 11:18:15 AM   
TallClevDom


Posts: 54
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
"Censorship" is used incorrectly in the title. Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of speech. Not providing a vehicle for that speech (i.e., not airing the commercial) is not censorship. You are free to say what you want, but no one is required to give you a platform for you to say it.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 11:53:00 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
I love how President Trump constantly runs circles around fake news alt left fascist types

quote:


The campaign planned to put $1.5 million behind the 30-second ad
Instead the publicity will drive millions of eyeballs to see it, free of charge



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4477928/CNN-ABC-CBS-NBC-refuse-run-fake-news-Trump-ad.html#ixzz4gERSHuip
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook




_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 12:11:23 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
*snicker* dailymail fake news can spin any sort of shit into a real blossom.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 12:17:14 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

I love how President Trump constantly runs circles around fake news alt left fascist types

quote:


The campaign planned to put $1.5 million behind the 30-second ad
Instead the publicity will drive millions of eyeballs to see it, free of charge



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4477928/CNN-ABC-CBS-NBC-refuse-run-fake-news-Trump-ad.html#ixzz4gERSHuip
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook




You're complaining about fake news while citing The Mail as a source?
Fucking hell. Your lift doesn't go all the way up to the top floor, does it?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/5/2017 8:43:50 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Actually with the state of media in the US, Dailymail is looking better and better.

There used to be laws against it but now about a half dozen people own it all. If you don't think they are imposing their will on what is displayed then apparently you don't think. Not that they exercise day to day control over the content, but by policies and hiring practices the influence is certainly there.

Still, they are private entities and making them air an ad that makes them look bad by law is just as bad as forcing someone to bake a cake for a Gay marriage. Does the President have franking rights like members of congress ? He could do direct mail. Even if he had to pay for it, bulk mail is cheap.

There used to be integrity in the news, though it was never perfect. Some people felt some responsibility to the truth. Now all they care is their paycheck, mainly because most of them are in debt up to their ears. That's what I mean when I say to buy noting and stop feeding the beast. A huge house mortgage is slavery. You cannot afford to quite your job. They could make you give blow jobs all day once you are in debt because the only power you have is to quit, and quitting means losing everything.

When I worked, I was extremely valuable and did quit. Eventually I went back, like eight times. It was my phone that rang and they always threw money at me. Towards the end, when they started some shit I didn't like ad I said "Ho boy, wait until my house is paid off", and I meant it. I cut down my working time to a bare minimum. Eventually I was out of there and actually traded jobs with someone which cut both our drive times way down. I had smashed a car trying to get there on time back in 1989 at which point I told them "I get here when I get here".

But most people cannot do that, plus they got kids. They are slaves, or more aptly put, serfs. Slaves are taken care of because their owner wants to maintain the property, serfs have to pay for their own shit.

But if you ever wonder why people, who should be good folks in most cases, will fuck over everyone at work, take a look at their mortgage, insurance, school tuition, payments on the new plasma TV and the internet to go with it along with smartphones for all the kids. If they quit they would be on the street in a matter of months, and they know there are not that many jobs out there, especially good paying ones.

Now if a CNN sales rep would have taken an ad and aired it that is critical of CNN, what do you think would have happened to him ? In the old days, probably nothing. It would just be considered "fair and balanced", but fair and balanced has taken on a whole new meaning these days.

And the corporate has more power than the government unless you got some really good Jewish lawyers. We live in a society in which court decide more about where the money goes than anyone else. I'm not saying it's right, but it pretty much looks like that is how it is.

You now what gets me ? See, we ow use the closed captioning on the TV. It is much better to have rid of the background music and special effects sounds. But the people who do the captioning make mistakes o the news. It is as if they want people to think this is all real time, impromptu dialog by the anchormen. Well that is completely untrue, every word is scripted. There are very few exceptions. Those might include the weatherman actually being outside but that is usually chromakeyed, which means he is in studio in front of a blue or "magic purple" background and the computer overlays a background from a camera outside behind him. The show is not live, and even if it is close to live there is a delay so they can correct mistakes. Ever see any of those "Why TV isn't live anymore" ?

Another thing they do, and this might drive you crazy once you really notice it, they use people with blue or green eyes. They look more honest. In fact you will see this in shows and movies as well. Brown eyed people are in the majority in this world, but not on screen. But the consensus in the industry is that viewers find blue or green eyed people more credible.

And it is an industry. And it is all sensationalism. Those people who kept their dead Mother in storage for eight months ? I knew them. The news said they did it for her social security checks but they were busted with eight UNCASHED social security checks. I know why they really did it, but the news does not look beyond the surface of an issue. They are like the kid on the street yelling "EXTRA EXTRA" selling newspapers. And unlike the past, they are taking unprecedented liberties with the facts.

I don't really see any way to rein them in other than to pretty much boycott them. Then we get no news at all or it all comes from overseas, and those outlets are not quite totally unbiased either. They tend toward liberalism because those countries are much more infected and affected. Like that they have health care. Sure, but if you make $500 a week you only take half of that home and you don't get a couple grand income tax refund either. People in good health are fucked. But their governments, and the attitude of the people seem to be that they like it that way. But then they don't lose their house when they get sick either. But what about those who do not get sick ? They get fucked.

Seems to me the BBC has been going a bit downhill. They are starting to sound like the party line more and more. I understand their liberalism but I am starting to wonder just what they refuse to report.

And of course RT and PressTV have slants that are anti-us. Take that with some salt. Al Jazzera is not balanced. You have to sift through it all to get anywhere near the truth. It was not so bad in years past but I tend to blame, partly at least, the conglomeration of these sources for the misinformation of US people, many of whom are paranoid to even read a foreign news source. Even the one from Israel, Haaretz, I find to be less unfair than most sources.

T^T

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 4:18:16 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Actually with the state of media in the US, Dailymail is looking better and better.

That's more a criticism of your news media than a compliment to the Mail.
The obsession the rightists on here have with that, the Telegraph and the Murdoch red tops is depressing. If you want to cite a right-leaning British paper as a source, stick to the Times or the FT, which are much better papers. The FT is, whatever you think about it on an ideological level, more scrupulous about fact checking than any other paper in the UK.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 4:42:07 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
guffaws I just saw the advert its fuking insane. Anyone got the link for it on youtube?

guffaws guffaws https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bXIsRrk2SM

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 5/6/2017 4:45:15 AM >

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 8:51:25 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1598
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Actually with the state of media in the US, Dailymail is looking better and better.

That's more a criticism of your news media than a compliment to the Mail.
The obsession the rightists on here have with that, the Telegraph and the Murdoch red tops is depressing. If you want to cite a right-leaning British paper as a source, stick to the Times or the FT, which are much better papers. The FT is, whatever you think about it on an ideological level, more scrupulous about fact checking than any other paper in the UK.


I fear you are mistaken about those being "news media" - they are gospel.
Given by the one and only St Rupert, the prophet of Oz.
Manna, nectar, and ambrosia, in abundance given for his true believers, his happy flock following him to salvation.

And only 65p ...

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 9:01:43 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Actually with the state of media in the US, Dailymail is looking better and better.

That's more a criticism of your news media than a compliment to the Mail.
The obsession the rightists on here have with that, the Telegraph and the Murdoch red tops is depressing. If you want to cite a right-leaning British paper as a source, stick to the Times or the FT, which are much better papers. The FT is, whatever you think about it on an ideological level, more scrupulous about fact checking than any other paper in the UK.


I fear you are mistaken about those being "news media" - they are gospel.
Given by the one and only St Rupert, the prophet of Oz.
Manna, nectar, and ambrosia, in abundance given for his true believers, his happy flock following him to salvation.

And only 65p ...


I was forgetting.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 9:03:38 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Actually with the state of media in the US, Dailymail is looking better and better.

That's more a criticism of your news media than a compliment to the Mail.
The obsession the rightists on here have with that, the Telegraph and the Murdoch red tops is depressing. If you want to cite a right-leaning British paper as a source, stick to the Times or the FT, which are much better papers. The FT is, whatever you think about it on an ideological level, more scrupulous about fact checking than any other paper in the UK.


I fear you are mistaken about those being "news media" - they are gospel.
Given by the one and only St Rupert, the prophet of Oz.
Manna, nectar, and ambrosia, in abundance given for his true believers, his happy flock following him to salvation.

And only 65p ...


Alt left radicals really hate how their media propagandists CNN and BBC etc have been exposed... How FOX and Daily Mail, even Internet bloggers and others get the truth out despite the alt left screeching and wailing, and their violently attacking people in the streets for speaking their minds etc



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 9:14:38 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Actually with the state of media in the US, Dailymail is looking better and better.

That's more a criticism of your news media than a compliment to the Mail.
The obsession the rightists on here have with that, the Telegraph and the Murdoch red tops is depressing. If you want to cite a right-leaning British paper as a source, stick to the Times or the FT, which are much better papers. The FT is, whatever you think about it on an ideological level, more scrupulous about fact checking than any other paper in the UK.


I fear you are mistaken about those being "news media" - they are gospel.
Given by the one and only St Rupert, the prophet of Oz.
Manna, nectar, and ambrosia, in abundance given for his true believers, his happy flock following him to salvation.

And only 65p ...


Alt left radicals really hate how their media propagandists CNN and BBC etc have been exposed... How FOX and Daily Mail, even Internet bloggers and others get the truth out despite the alt left screeching and wailing, and their violently attacking people in the streets for speaking their minds etc



How many stories have the BBC been forced to retract over the last two years?
How many times have they been successfully sued for defamation over the same period?
Do you think that Murdoch has a lower or higher number of retracted stories or slanderous lies about people in the same period?
I'd also be intrigued to hear why you feel that the BBC, which is probably the single most mainstream media company in existence, has anything to do with the "alt" anything...

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 9:35:55 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
Why don't you prove your theory with citations?

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 9:40:28 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
do you zip up the back?

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 9:48:58 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1598
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
...
How FOX and Daily Mail, even Internet bloggers and others get the truth out ...




I fear you 'll never realise how just funny your jokes can be at times

I guess those "bloggers" include you, don't they?



(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run... - 5/6/2017 10:42:58 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Why don't you prove your theory with citations?

You're the one making claims, the onus is on you to provide some proof for them.
Demonstrate that News International is doing a better job of getting the truth out than the BBC.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> CNN Was Accused of Censorship After Refusing to Run a Trump Campaign Ad Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109