quote:

inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement, the media’s assault on police shootings, and criticism from politicians,
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/fbi-blm-inspired-cop-killings-new-norm/#SJXmr61f65tPtOIk.99

Yep, no indication at all tha BLM has anything to do with anti police atitudes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement, the media’s assault on police shootings, and criticism from politicians,
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/fbi-blm-inspired-cop-killings-new-norm/#SJXmr61f65tPtOIk.99

Yep, no indication at all tha BLM has anything to do with anti police atitudes.

This comes directly from the report as published in full in the Washington Examiner: COPY OF FBI REPORT

1. Inspired by the Black Lives Matter Movement . . .2 out of 50 individuals made this claim.

Speci?cally in the Dallas, TX, and Baton Rouge, LA, attacks, the assailants said they were in?uenced by the
Black Lives Matter movement, and their belief that law enforcement was targeting black males.

And yet you made BLM part of the headline of your thread. That hardly seems justified or truthful.

Of the 14 assailants that openly attacked police there were other factors, prior criminal history and drugs influence:

The assailants who had a hatred of law enforcement informed their friends and/or family that they intended to
kill a police of?cer or that they wanted to ?shoot it out with police.? Of the 14 assailants who ambushed law
enforcement, 10 of them had a prior criminal history. Additionally, 10 out of the 14 assailants were under the in?uence of narcotics or had a history of drug use at the time of the incident.


Mostly, the remaining assailants were on the lam and wanted to avoid going back to jail. Has nothing to do with BLM.

An assailant?s desire to remain free and not return to custody was the main commonality shown in a majority of
the fatal attacks. These attacks took one of two forms: 1) drug use that led to a heightened sense of desperation
to avoid arrest and incarceration, and 2) the assailant?s desire for freedom.

Law enforcement of?cials noted an increase in the number of subjects using drugs and being in a drug-induced
when contacted by police. Many law enforcement personnel are seeing an ?escalation towards
violence? by those who abuse drugs. A high percentage of assailants were under the in?uence during these
incidents or had a history of drug use. Of?cer interviews highlighted the assailants? skewed ?decision-making
matrix? when contacted by law enforcement while under the in?uence of a narcotic, compounded with the
thought of not wanting to return to custody. Instead of complying - as they typically had in the past they,
instead, attacked. Multiple agencies expressed surprise that the fatal encounters occurred because the assailants
had no prior history of violent attacks against police. This is consistent with the fact that prior to fatal
encounter, only a quarter of the assailants had expressed on social media or to friends and family that they
would do anything not to go back to jail.



Again, nothing to do with BLM. These resulted from personal contact by the police.

In approximately 40% of the incidents, the assailant ?ed before they turned and shot at the of?cers. Law
enforcement personnel described the circumstances that led to these foot chases, and they ranged from the
of?cer verbally identifying the assailant, consensual contact, attempting to arrest, and serving a warrant.

These studied incidents mostly were not assassinations.

Due to coverage of high profile cases by the press and social media, again not BLM:

Due to the coverage of the high-pro?le police incidents, it appears that immediately following the incidents,
assailants were constantly exposed to a singular narrative by news organizations and social media of police
misconduct and wrong-doing. In many cases, this singular narrative came from the subject?s friends and
family, and witnesses to the incident who often knew the subject, long before law enforcement provided their
?ndings to the public. Without law enforcement and elected of?cials providing an alternative narrative,
assailants developed a distrust of law enforcement, and felt emboldened and justi?ed in using violence against
police.

Soooooo . . . . Bama, of the criminals who wanted to kill police 14 were influenced by media of high visible events.

ONLY TWO MENTIONED BLM.

It seems to me the analysis of the FBI report was mistaken by the RW media that released it, and you were fooled by the media. That's what I think.

This was kinda choppy because I had to switch over into free fonts to copy it. But both copies are available at the cite.

Mostly, the assailants were druggies and/or on the lam.

quote:

Strange since at least two of the assasians said they were inspired by BLM. But the Wash Post has a far better idea of there reasons that they would.
What reason does BLM have to exist other than to combat evil cops?
Remember the BLM rally in NYC with the protestors chantingfor more dead cops, no, of course you don't, it violates BLM's image (in your mind) of being next to sainthood, like the Bllack Panthers.

I know you want me to be making stuff up but I just tookthe article title to name the thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaDLyingWelfarePatient

Strange since at least two of the assasians said they were inspired by BLM. But the Wash Post has a far better idea of there reasons that they would.
What reason does BLM have to exist other than to combat evil cops?
Remember the BLM rally in NYC with the protestors chantingfor more dead cops, no, of course you don't, it violates BLM's image (in your mind) of being next to sainthood, like the Bllack Panthers.

I know you want me to be making stuff up but I just tookthe article title to name the thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

BAMA. . . . . .

quote:

inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement, the media’s assault on police shootings, and criticism from politicians,
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/fbi-blm-inspired-cop-killings-new-norm/#SJXmr61f65tPtOIk.99

Yep, no indication at all tha BLM has anything to do with anti police atitudes.

This comes directly from the report as published in full in the Washington Examiner: COPY OF FBI REPORT

Inspired by the Black Lives Matter Movement . . only 2 out of 50 individuals made this claim.

Speci?cally in the Dallas, TX, and Baton Rouge, LA, attacks, the assailants said they were in?uenced by the
Black Lives Matter movement, and their belief that law enforcement was targeting black males.

And yet you made BLM part of the headline of your thread. That hardly seems justified or truthful.

Of the 14 assailants that openly attacked police there were other factors, prior criminal history and drugs influence:

The assailants who had a hatred of law enforcement informed their friends and/or family that they intended to
kill a police of?cer or that they wanted to ?shoot it out with police.? Of the 14 assailants who ambushed law
enforcement, 10 of them had a prior criminal history. Additionally, 10 out of the 14 assailants were under the in?uence of narcotics or had a history of drug use at the time of the incident.


Mostly, the remaining assailants were on the lam and wanted to avoid going back to jail. Has nothing to do with BLM.

An assailant?s desire to remain free and not return to custody was the main commonality shown in a majority of
the fatal attacks. These attacks took one of two forms: 1) drug use that led to a heightened sense of desperation
to avoid arrest and incarceration, and 2) the assailant?s desire for freedom.

Law enforcement of?cials noted an increase in the number of subjects using drugs and being in a drug-induced
when contacted by police. Many law enforcement personnel are seeing an ?escalation towards
violence? by those who abuse drugs. A high percentage of assailants were under the in?uence during these
incidents or had a history of drug use. Of?cer interviews highlighted the assailants? skewed ?decision-making
matrix? when contacted by law enforcement while under the in?uence of a narcotic, compounded with the
thought of not wanting to return to custody. Instead of complying - as they typically had in the past they,
instead, attacked. Multiple agencies expressed surprise that the fatal encounters occurred because the assailants
had no prior history of violent attacks against police. This is consistent with the fact that prior to fatal
encounter, only a quarter of the assailants had expressed on social media or to friends and family that they
would do anything not to go back to jail.



Again, nothing to do with BLM. These resulted from personal contact by the police.

In approximately 40% of the incidents, the assailant ?ed before they turned and shot at the of?cers. Law
enforcement personnel described the circumstances that led to these foot chases, and they ranged from the
of?cer verbally identifying the assailant, consensual contact, attempting to arrest, and serving a warrant.

These studied incidents mostly were not assassinations.

Due to coverage of high profile cases by the press and social media, again not BLM:

Due to the coverage of the high-pro?le police incidents, it appears that immediately following the incidents,
assailants were constantly exposed to a singular narrative by news organizations and social media of police
misconduct and wrong-doing. In many cases, this singular narrative came from the subject?s friends and
family, and witnesses to the incident who often knew the subject, long before law enforcement provided their
?ndings to the public. Without law enforcement and elected of?cials providing an alternative narrative,
assailants developed a distrust of law enforcement, and felt emboldened and justi?ed in using violence against
police.

Soooooo . . . . Bama, of the criminals who wanted to kill police 14 were influenced by media of high visible events.

ONLY TWO MENTIONED BLM.

It seems to me the analysis of the FBI report was mistaken by the RW media that released it, and you were fooled by the media. That's what I think.

This was kinda choppy because I had to switch over into free fonts to copy it. But both copies are available at the cite.

Mostly, the assailants were druggies and/or on the lam.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Strange since at least two of the assasians said they were inspired by BLM. But the Wash Post has a far better idea of there reasons that they would.
What reason does BLM have to exist other than to combat evil cops?
Remember the BLM rally in NYC with the protestors chantingfor more dead cops, no, of course you don't, it violates BLM's image (in your mind) of being next to sainthood, like the Bllack Panthers.

I know you want me to be making stuff up but I just tookthe article title to name the thread.

You did not much read my analysis of the report itself.


Your quick answer is something about the Washington Post and stuff you saw people yelling on TV. That is pretty feeble reply, Bama. Really not worth my wasting my time trying to show you how analysis and headlines are twisted. Nope, not gonna waste my time with you anymore, Bama, you got your mind made you refuse to consider other scenarios. Well, maybe some other readers will gain something from my post, a sense of the falsity of partisan reporting if nothing else.

Otherwise, you are being ignored from this point on for the insult you gave me of not even looking at the issues I raised.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

But Hilary!

So what?
Not relevant, this is still not about personalities.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

But Hilary!

So what?
Not relevant, this is still not about personalities.

WM is a very immature person.

T^T

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

BAMA. . . . . .

quote:

inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement, the media’s assault on police shootings, and criticism from politicians,
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/fbi-blm-inspired-cop-killings-new-norm/#SJXmr61f65tPtOIk.99

Yep, no indication at all tha BLM has anything to do with anti police atitudes.

This comes directly from the report as published in full in the Washington Examiner: COPY OF FBI REPORT

Inspired by the Black Lives Matter Movement . . only 2 out of 50 individuals made this claim.

Speci?cally in the Dallas, TX, and Baton Rouge, LA, attacks, the assailants said they were in?uenced by the
Black Lives Matter movement, and their belief that law enforcement was targeting black males.

And yet you made BLM part of the headline of your thread. That hardly seems justified or truthful.

Of the 14 assailants that openly attacked police there were other factors, prior criminal history and drugs influence:

The assailants who had a hatred of law enforcement informed their friends and/or family that they intended to
kill a police of?cer or that they wanted to ?shoot it out with police.? Of the 14 assailants who ambushed law
enforcement, 10 of them had a prior criminal history. Additionally, 10 out of the 14 assailants were under the in?uence of narcotics or had a history of drug use at the time of the incident.


Mostly, the remaining assailants were on the lam and wanted to avoid going back to jail. Has nothing to do with BLM.

An assailant?s desire to remain free and not return to custody was the main commonality shown in a majority of
the fatal attacks. These attacks took one of two forms: 1) drug use that led to a heightened sense of desperation
to avoid arrest and incarceration, and 2) the assailant?s desire for freedom.

Law enforcement of?cials noted an increase in the number of subjects using drugs and being in a drug-induced
when contacted by police. Many law enforcement personnel are seeing an ?escalation towards
violence? by those who abuse drugs. A high percentage of assailants were under the in?uence during these
incidents or had a history of drug use. Of?cer interviews highlighted the assailants? skewed ?decision-making
matrix? when contacted by law enforcement while under the in?uence of a narcotic, compounded with the
thought of not wanting to return to custody. Instead of complying - as they typically had in the past they,
instead, attacked. Multiple agencies expressed surprise that the fatal encounters occurred because the assailants
had no prior history of violent attacks against police. This is consistent with the fact that prior to fatal
encounter, only a quarter of the assailants had expressed on social media or to friends and family that they
would do anything not to go back to jail.



Again, nothing to do with BLM. These resulted from personal contact by the police.

In approximately 40% of the incidents, the assailant ?ed before they turned and shot at the of?cers. Law
enforcement personnel described the circumstances that led to these foot chases, and they ranged from the
of?cer verbally identifying the assailant, consensual contact, attempting to arrest, and serving a warrant.

These studied incidents mostly were not assassinations.

Due to coverage of high profile cases by the press and social media, again not BLM:

Due to the coverage of the high-pro?le police incidents, it appears that immediately following the incidents,
assailants were constantly exposed to a singular narrative by news organizations and social media of police
misconduct and wrong-doing. In many cases, this singular narrative came from the subject?s friends and
family, and witnesses to the incident who often knew the subject, long before law enforcement provided their
?ndings to the public. Without law enforcement and elected of?cials providing an alternative narrative,
assailants developed a distrust of law enforcement, and felt emboldened and justi?ed in using violence against
police.

Soooooo . . . . Bama, of the criminals who wanted to kill police 14 were influenced by media of high visible events.

ONLY TWO MENTIONED BLM.

It seems to me the analysis of the FBI report was mistaken by the RW media that released it, and you were fooled by the media. That's what I think.

This was kinda choppy because I had to switch over into free fonts to copy it. But both copies are available at the cite.

Mostly, the assailants were druggies and/or on the lam.

Brilliant.
2 admitted to being inspired by BLM.
How many of the others died during the attacks so we never got their staement of insperation.
And of the survivors, while the didn't say BLM inspired me to do this their reasons almost universally parrotting the BLM party line so, much as you and the Wash Post want to they do have a hand in the anti cop bias.
And who can forget "pigs in a blanket" at the post Gardner rally which was followed by a man
who drove several hundred miles to ambush two cops to avenge the things which were a replay of BLM claims at that rally.
They weren't directly envolved, and if you ignore "pigs in a blanket" but they sure influenced the situation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

The right to bear arms does not equate to the right to hunt and murder cops.
That fits in with the beliefs of the wosrt of the soveriegn citizen movement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

The right to bear arms does not equate to the right to hunt and murder cops.
That fits in with the beliefs of the wosrt of the soveriegn citizen movement.

No, it doesn't. It equates to nourishing your community and protecting your people against rogue cops.

It is purely hypocritical to blame black people for impoverished communities an then set out like JEHoover did to treat the Panthers as a subversive gang.
You want black people to clean up their neighborhoods but only in a manner of servility, because simply put, white authorities fear any blacks who are not Uncle Tom boot lickers, who stand up for the rights of their people, which have long been crushed in this country.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

The right to bear arms does not equate to the right to hunt and murder cops.
That fits in with the beliefs of the wosrt of the soveriegn citizen movement.

No, it doesn't. It equates to nourishing your community and protecting your people against rogue cops.

It is purely hypocritical to blame black people for impoverished communities an then set out like JEHoover did to treat the Panthers as a subversive gang.
You want black people to clean up their neighborhoods but only in a manner of servility, because simply put, white authorities fear any blacks who are not Uncle Tom boot lickers, who stand up for the rights of their people, which have long been crushed in this country.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

The right to bear arms does not equate to the right to hunt and murder cops.
That fits in with the beliefs of the wosrt of the soveriegn citizen movement.

No, it doesn't. It equates to nourishing your community and protecting your people against rogue cops.

It is purely hypocritical to blame black people for impoverished communities an then set out like JEHoover did to treat the Panthers as a subversive gang.
You want black people to clean up their neighborhoods but only in a manner of servility, because simply put, white authorities fear any blacks who are not Uncle Tom boot lickers, who stand up for the rights of their people, which have long been crushed in this country.