hizgeorgiapeach
Posts: 1672
Status: offline
|
I voted for all of them - for the very reason that Merc mentioned. If you are not willing to fight to maintain ALL freedoms it's a tad hypocritical to fight Just for the ones that affect YOU PERSONALLY. It's cliched. It's been quoted so often that it nauseates a lot of people. It's out there in several forms. And yet, despite all that, I'm going to paraphrase it again here. They came for the Jews and I was not a Jew, so I did not protest. They came for the Gypsies, and I was not a Gypsy, so I did not protest. They came for the Unionists, and I was not in a Union, so I did not protest. Then they came for ME - and there was no one Left to protest. Rights and Freedoms work the same way. I often jokingly refer to myself as a Rabid Constitionalist and say that I have no qualms about maintaining my Second Amendment right to bear arms via the very arms they are attempting to strip from me. It isn't a joke. Nor is it a joke (though many take it as pure sarcasm) when I tell someone - I will fight, and if need be die, to protect your right to hold the wrong opinion. After all, just because I will fight to protect your right to hold your opinion doesn't mean that I'm going to pat you on the head and Agree with your opinion. Fighting for YOUR right to an opinion, or freedom, comes with the Caveat that I'm also fighting for MY right to hold an opinion or exercise a freedom - even one that YOU disagree with.
_____________________________
Rhi Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. Essential Scentsations
|