quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

As john fuselgang said earlier.
Yes, Trump revealed highly classified info to the Russian foreign minister; but in fairness it wasn't via email & he doesn't have a vagina

You think the tweet said that

Hilarious

Here in reality, the tweet said exactly what I have been saying

Despite alt left snowflakes paranoid delusions, heads of state meet.

Period.

Nothing unusual. As president, Donald Trump has the right - even the obligation, to meet with the Russians. What was the meeting about? Saving civilian lives on airliners, and beating back Muslim fundamentalists

And so a known Democrat crony (Jeff Bezos) throws out a few lies to the alt left fake news dependant crowd (that would be you) and this humanitarian effort becomes some sinister conspiracy theory

Which never happened, according to the people who were actually there (and despite Jeff Bezos' literally shady anonymous sources)

Despite being given the heads up that you are pedaling more fake news, you have to lose your fucking minds - because that's what you do

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

It seems now the the President did in fact share information about ISIS with the Russians. This information was given the US by a third party country on condition that their involvement be kept confidential.

The President does have the legal ability to reveal sources as he sees fit.... but it was irresponsible on his part. How can we be expected to obtain critical information if we cannot be trusted to keep in confidential?

As a side note... someone high up in Trump's inner circle is leaking damaging information. He should stop blaming his intelligence services and start tapping the shoulders of his white house staff.

Butch

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

It seems now the the President did in fact share information about ISIS with the Russians. This information was given the US by a third party country on condition that their involvement be kept confidential.

The President does have the legal ability to reveal sources as he sees fit.... but it was irresponsible on his part. How can we be expected to obtain critical information if we cannot be trusted to keep in confidential?

As a side note... someone high up in Trump's inner circle is leaking damaging information. He should stop blaming his intelligence services and start tapping the shoulders of his white house staff.

Butch

Again, that's information from a Clinton operative (Jeff Bezos) who claims he got his information from shady "anonymous sources" and the people who were there called a press conference to plainly and openly state that Jeff Bezos is pushing a flat out lie

It never happened

What did happen, is that the president openly met with the Russians, meaning he didn't hide that he was meeting with them, and he had a team with him

It was about sharing pertinent information that was necessary to save civilian lives on airlines. Muslims have apparently learned how to hide devastating bombs in notebook PCs in a way that is nearly impossible to detect. Sources and methods were not discussed, according to the people who were there, as stated in a public press conference

And the president has been open about cooperating with Russia in the fight against fundamentalist Muslims since the beginning, there is nothing new there either

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~~

I haven't read through the distasteful swamp of personal attacks in this thread so I may have missed this post.

You are all aware that a transcript of the meeting was distributed to all Intelligence Agencies; that transcript is the source of the report of Trump's misdeeds. His conversations are no big secret.

You may not like Bebos or Wapo of whoever, the point is official transcripts nailed the prez on this one. That's why his response on twitter this morning was so Nixonian: if the president does it it is not a crime, forgetting of course he has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution. Stay tuned, kids.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~~

I haven't read through the distasteful swamp of personal attacks in this thread so I may have missed this post.

You are all aware that a transcript of the meeting was distributed to all Intelligence Agencies; that transcript is the source of the report of Trump's misdeeds. His conversations are no big secret.

You may not like Bebos or Wapo of whoever, the point is official transcripts nailed the prez on this one. That's why his response on twitter this morning was so Nixonian: if the president does it it is not a crime, forgetting of course he has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution. Stay tuned, kids.

Have you found a link to the transcript yet Vincent? do you think it will make the headlines today or further down the road.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

From Eric Erickson, at
http://theresurgent.com/i-know-one-of-the-sources/

I tend to take these stories about the President with a grain of salt. We have seen key details of a number of salacious stories retracted within 48 hours. The media hates the President so much that they’ll run a negative story about him without very much provocation. Anti-Trump sources embedded within the administration in the career civil service, etc. will leak to the press and confirmation bias sets in.

What sets this story apart for me, at least, is that I know one of the sources. And the source is solidly supportive of President Trump, or at least has been and was during Campaign 2016. But the President will not take any internal criticism, no matter how politely it is given. He does not want advice, cannot be corrected, and is too insecure to see any constructive feedback as anything other than an attack.

So some of the sources are left with no other option but to go to the media, leak the story, and hope that the intense blowback gives the President a swift kick in the butt. Perhaps then he will recognize he screwed up. The President cares vastly more about what the press says than what his advisers say. That is a real problem and one his advisers are having to recognize and use, even if it causes messy stories to get outside the White House perimeter.

I am told that what the President did is actually far worse than what is being reported. The President does not seem to realize or appreciate that his bragging can undermine relationships with our allies and with human intelligence sources. He also does not seem to appreciate that his loose lips can get valuable assets in the field killed.

You can call these sources disloyal, traitors, or whatever you want. But please ask yourself a question — if the President, through inexperience and ignorance, is jeopardizing our national security and will not take advice or corrective action, what other means are available to get the President to listen and recognize the error of his ways?

This is a real problem and I treat this story very seriously because I know just how credible, competent, and serious — as well as seriously pro-Trump, at least one of the sources is.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~~

I haven't read through the distasteful swamp of personal attacks in this thread so I may have missed this post.

You are all aware that a transcript of the meeting was distributed to all Intelligence Agencies; that transcript is the source of the report of Trump's misdeeds. His conversations are no big secret.

You may not like Bebos or Wapo of whoever, the point is official transcripts nailed the prez on this one. That's why his response on twitter this morning was so Nixonian: if the president does it it is not a crime, forgetting of course he has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution. Stay tuned, kids.

Have you found a link to the transcript yet Vincent? do you think it will make the headlines today or further down the road.

Ah...since the tweets you posted actually mean nothing, despite your giddy make believe, you now await the transcript. We'll all wait and see. Well those of us not making shit up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Ah...since the tweets you posted actually mean nothing, despite your giddy make believe, you now await the transcript. We'll all wait and see. Well those of us not making shit up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Putin told trump to have the meeting, hows that for masterful

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

As john fuselgang said earlier.
Yes, Trump revealed highly classified info to the Russian foreign minister; but in fairness it wasn't via email & he doesn't have a vagina

You think the tweet said that

Hilarious

Here in reality, the tweet said exactly what I have been saying

Despite alt left snowflakes paranoid delusions, heads of state meet.

Period.

Nothing unusual. As president, Donald Trump has the right - even the obligation, to meet with the Russians. What was the meeting about? Saving civilian lives on airliners, and beating back Muslim fundamentalists

And so a known Democrat crony (Jeff Bezos) throws out a few lies to the alt left fake news dependant crowd (that would be you) and this humanitarian effort becomes some sinister conspiracy theory

Which never happened, according to the people who were actually there (and despite Jeff Bezos' literally shady anonymous sources)

Despite being given the heads up that you are pedaling more fake news, you have to lose your fucking minds - because that's what you do

Oh if it were only just BeZos


Judge Nap: Trump Russian Intel Leak 'Most Potentially Catastrophic' Yet

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/05/15/trump-leaks-classified-information-russia-judge-napolitano-intelligence-mcmaster

Judge Andrew Napolitano said the report of classified information being openly revealed by President Trump to the Russians is the "most potentially catastrophic" yet.

Napolitano said that there were a "finite number" of people in the room when Trump met with Russian envoys last week.
with video
He said that one of those people is either directly or indirectly the person that anonymously leaked their recollections to the Washington Post on Monday.

National Security Adviser Gen. H.R. McMaster said in a brief press appearance that the Post's story is false.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~~

I haven't read through the distasteful swamp of personal attacks in this thread so I may have missed this post.

You are all aware that a transcript of the meeting was distributed to all Intelligence Agencies; that transcript is the source of the report of Trump's misdeeds. His conversations are no big secret.

You may not like Bebos or Wapo of whoever, the point is official transcripts nailed the prez on this one. That's why his response on twitter this morning was so Nixonian: if the president does it it is not a crime, forgetting of course he has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution. Stay tuned, kids.

Have you found a link to the transcript yet Vincent? do you think it will make the headlines today or further down the road.

Ah...since the tweets you posted actually mean nothing, despite your giddy make believe, you now await the transcript. We'll all wait and see. Well those of us not making shit up.

your ignorance of what is going on is obvious, its not me "making shit up"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

lester holt interview...he said I spoke to Putin and he asked me to have a meeting with Labarov.
you arent the only one who is allowed to spin.
twirl sugarshortsean

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

lester holt interview...he said I spoke to Putin and he asked me to have a meeting with Labarov.
you arent the only one who is allowed to spin.
twirl sugarshortsean

The shock

The horror

A sure sign of the apocalypse

A president met with Putin



Heads of state meeting, has never happened before