Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

KenDckey -> Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 10:31:14 AM)

http://popularmilitary.com/canadas-army-first-issue-direction-kill-child-soldiers/

When it it appropriate to engage a child soldier?




WhoreMods -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 10:33:01 AM)

When they're shooting at you, or might possibly shoot at you, or look like they know somebody who might shoot at you.
(Or, if you'r in Belfast or Palestine, if they have a stone in one hand.)



WickedsDesire -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 11:20:42 AM)

what whoremods said.

Then there are human shields, and then there are babies with bombs strapped to them ( yes that's a real thing).

Then you have Trumps first operation - you either know the details of that one or you do not. They gathered not on iota of intelligence and slaughtered about 50 civilians - up form the original story of "1" and several wounded and 1 American killed.

Then the mad fuk tried to parade the fallen American Army guys Dad on TV and he said fuk off. Then he paraded his widow(fallen officer) on TV - and that was a thing of true shame.

If they are shooting at you then I think its fine to shoot back - if they are "pointing a gun" in your general direction I am not sure ken




vincentML -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 4:21:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

what whoremods said.

Then there are human shields, and then there are babies with bombs strapped to them ( yes that's a real thing).

Then you have Trumps first operation - you either know the details of that one or you do not. They gathered not on iota of intelligence and slaughtered about 50 civilians - up form the original story of "1" and several wounded and 1 American killed.

Then the mad fuk tried to parade the fallen American Army guys Dad on TV and he said fuk off. Then he paraded his widow(fallen officer) on TV - and that was a thing of true shame.

If they are shooting at you then I think its fine to shoot back - if they are "pointing a gun" in your general direction I am not sure ken



The kids are in a no win situation. They probably have guns pointed at their backs as well. Best solution would be for the Canadians, Americans and other industrialized nations to keep their troops off the battle field. Let the Russians deal with it. They're our friends, aren't they? [8|] [:'(]



Termyn8or -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 4:37:57 PM)

FR

Just shoot them. Take a lesson from the Israelis. They shot an unarmed 12 year old simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Literally the order was "Anything moves in that area kill it".

On a side note, those reports of Palestinians using children as shields are all bullshit. They don't work. The IDF will shoot right through them.

Your first duty is to yourself. Few actually give that up for good reason, but all in all very very few actually "give their life" for someone else. You see that shit in the movies.

Like they protested and called the Vietnam vet baby killers, well when that baby has a bomb strapped to his chest, you find out what is most important. Plus, the kid would be dead anyway, and so would a bunch of your comrades.

They say "All's fair in love and war" and as I see what is happening the more I believe it.

T^T



Dvr22999874 -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 5:03:09 PM)

It seems I rarely agree with some of the things you say Termyn8or, but I am afraid that, sick as it sounds, I have to agree with you 100% on this. I have seen everything from toddlers to toothless old grannies with grenades, guns and assorted lethal hardware. Our orders were that if you couldn't see their OPEN hands held well away from their bodies, shoot them. It was sometimes sickening work but it definitely saved a few lives; not only amongst my comrades and I but among the local population who might have happened to be in the vicinity. The bad dreams never seem to completely go away though.



BoscoX -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 7:22:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

what whoremods said.

Then there are human shields, and then there are babies with bombs strapped to them ( yes that's a real thing).

Then you have Trumps first operation - you either know the details of that one or you do not. They gathered not on iota of intelligence and slaughtered about 50 civilians - up form the original story of "1" and several wounded and 1 American killed.

Then the mad fuk tried to parade the fallen American Army guys Dad on TV and he said fuk off. Then he paraded his widow(fallen officer) on TV - and that was a thing of true shame.

If they are shooting at you then I think its fine to shoot back - if they are "pointing a gun" in your general direction I am not sure ken



The kids are in a no win situation. They probably have guns pointed at their backs as well. Best solution would be for the Canadians, Americans and other industrialized nations to keep their troops off the battle field. Let the Russians deal with it. They're our friends, aren't they? [8|] [:'(]


All depends on who is president, and if the leftist Secretary Of State and her old rapist man need walking around money



jlf1961 -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 8:14:10 PM)

I must point out that us troops faced this in Vietnam, and while there was no official directive on engaging a child soldier, the human initiative took over, kill them before they have a chance to kill you.

Hence part of the problem with returning vets and PTSD.

Add to that that the Christian and Muslim militias in Lebanon had 'soldiers' as young as 9 years old carrying arms....

On Grenada, the Cuban army had kids as young as 14 under arms as 'apprentice' soldiers, basically students from their military school...

And before all that the North Koreans routinely used 12 and thirteen year old kids as sappers and behind the lines snipers.

To quote Top Kick Bellamy "Kill those mother fuckers before they can kill you, dont worry about how old or young they are, if they got a weapon pointed in your general direction, put a burst into em, better than going home in a body bag."

The Official word to the general US public is that "American troops will try all things within reason to avoid engaging child soldiers."

Of course, since President Trump ended the rules of engagement that would limit collateral damage, which in truth put our troops in a much higher risk of being killed or wounded or eliminating the possibility of taking out a high profile target, I say good move.

You see, if 200 civilians are being kept as human shields to 15 or 20 terrorists, and they figure out that they can die just as fast in a drone strike as they could if they try and take out their captors, they may actually grow a spine and figure out these assholes are not doing a fucking thing for them. The odds always favor an unarmed mob who have figured out they have nothing left to loose, which is how a lot of those famous mobs in history got fucking guns in the first place.



vincentML -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/19/2017 9:09:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

what whoremods said.

Then there are human shields, and then there are babies with bombs strapped to them ( yes that's a real thing).

Then you have Trumps first operation - you either know the details of that one or you do not. They gathered not on iota of intelligence and slaughtered about 50 civilians - up form the original story of "1" and several wounded and 1 American killed.

Then the mad fuk tried to parade the fallen American Army guys Dad on TV and he said fuk off. Then he paraded his widow(fallen officer) on TV - and that was a thing of true shame.

If they are shooting at you then I think its fine to shoot back - if they are "pointing a gun" in your general direction I am not sure ken



The kids are in a no win situation. They probably have guns pointed at their backs as well. Best solution would be for the Canadians, Americans and other industrialized nations to keep their troops off the battle field. Let the Russians deal with it. They're our friends, aren't they? [8|] [:'(]


All depends on who is president, and if the leftist Secretary Of State and her old rapist man need walking around money

Ohhhh . . . so that was the real reason GW Bush invaded Iraq, not for WMD but for walking around money for the FUTURE secretary of state. I got it now.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 1:03:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Of course, since President Trump ended the rules of engagement that would limit collateral damage, which in truth put our troops in a much higher risk of being killed or wounded or eliminating the possibility of taking out a high profile target, I say good move.

You see, if 200 civilians are being kept as human shields to 15 or 20 terrorists, and they figure out that they can die just as fast in a drone strike as they could if they try and take out their captors, they may actually grow a spine and figure out these assholes are not doing a fucking thing for them. The odds always favor an unarmed mob who have figured out they have nothing left to loose, which is how a lot of those famous mobs in history got fucking guns in the first place.



It has always been one of my contentions that the threat of collateral damage is one of the best deterrents to war ... and then, along came Al Qaeda/DAESH to show me that some scumbags just don't have a soul.

It puts a new wrinkle in the issue for me.



Michael



Dvr22999874 -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 1:09:41 AM)

The best way to lose a war, is to fight it with one hand tied behind your back. If you HAVE to fight a war ( or get into any other fight) go into it' Boots and all' and go in to win. Get the other party down and KEEP them down. No rules. No plea for mercy. Do the job properly and even though it MAY give you nightmares, go in the knowledge that you ended it, at least for a while.



ResidentSadist -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 1:58:54 AM)

When they are an armed threat in an engagement zone. Bullets fired by women & children kill you just as dead as ones from male soldiers.



WhoreMods -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 2:25:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
You see, if 200 civilians are being kept as human shields to 15 or 20 terrorists, and they figure out that they can die just as fast in a drone strike as they could if they try and take out their captors, they may actually grow a spine and figure out these assholes are not doing a fucking thing for them. The odds always favor an unarmed mob who have figured out they have nothing left to loose, which is how a lot of those famous mobs in history got fucking guns in the first place.

Just look at the Haitain slave revolt or the uprising against the hijackers on on Flight 93...



WickedsDesire -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 5:39:52 AM)

I was talking about ISIS and monsters of that ilk re the human shields not Palestinians.
Collateral damage I said I also accept over the years. But they should publish the figures/estimates - all sides

The 200 mob against 15-20 do not go quietly into the night - The Jewish people are perhaps the best example of that. Fear and terror can lead to a immobilisation, resignation etc Its why they utislise fear and terror. An as someone said some, by no means all, guns pointed at their backs for they are the first wave - usual conditioning applies.

Do any of you believe just nuking large swathes of countries is going to solve this - I was actually surprised America didnt after the towers, But then again who carried it out, where were they trained, who trained them, where did they get the financial backing from. etc - so what would be a legitimate nuke target and what percentage of 1 000 000 as an example would be "Terrorists".

And remember America actually trained all of the pilots and they have a History of trying to install their own puppet regimes, or the most sympathetic to them, they can control just about everywhere. The Russians seem better at it these days ;)



WhoreMods -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 8:55:07 AM)

At the moment child militias are more Boko Haram than daesh.



WickedsDesire -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 9:17:19 AM)

was a general reply to no-one, or "all" in particular

Anyhoos was it a $100 billion Arms deal to the Saudis today? I bet you the orange cunt wombles cut is $101 billion because he is a tremendous business man - I presume he will put that on his expenses chitty to the treasury



MrRodgers -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 5:36:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

what whoremods said.

Then there are human shields, and then there are babies with bombs strapped to them ( yes that's a real thing).

Then you have Trumps first operation - you either know the details of that one or you do not. They gathered not on iota of intelligence and slaughtered about 50 civilians - up form the original story of "1" and several wounded and 1 American killed.

Then the mad fuk tried to parade the fallen American Army guys Dad on TV and he said fuk off. Then he paraded his widow(fallen officer) on TV - and that was a thing of true shame.

If they are shooting at you then I think its fine to shoot back - if they are "pointing a gun" in your general direction I am not sure ken



The kids are in a no win situation. They probably have guns pointed at their backs as well. Best solution would be for the Canadians, Americans and other industrialized nations to keep their troops off the battle field. Let the Russians deal with it. They're our friends, aren't they? [8|] [:'(]

Good idea, let the Russians die for a change from the poison of religious hatred.



Dvr22999874 -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/20/2017 5:37:32 PM)

Hear, hear R.S.



ResidentSadist -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/21/2017 10:53:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Hear, hear R.S.

Thanks



LadyDemura -> RE: Canada’s Army is first to issue direction on how to kill child soldiers (5/21/2017 11:47:09 PM)

How about never?



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625