RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct

RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Kirata -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 10:44:54 AM)
The reviewers are not identified, though I don't think that fact can be spun to imply that they were plumbers. The reviewing editor was Jamie Halsall, University of Huddersfield, UK, Senior Lecturer in Social Sciences in the Department of Behavioural Sciences and Social Sciences, and it isn't much of a stretch to suppose that the reviewers, too, were academics in the social sciences. K.

Kirata -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 10:46:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird This from the same guy who adduced an arms dealer to police forces and their conspicuously selected population poll as 'evidence' that all police were in favor of increased citizen gun ownership. Give credit where credit is due; he's nothing if not relentless in effort to 'creating reality' of his own imagining. People don't need you to tell them what my posts say or argue. They can read for themselves. So anytime you would like to direct their attention to one, I invite you to post a link. Nobody likes a Gossip Lady. K.

Edwird -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:01:50 AM)
So now your own posts are relegated to 'gossip.' Thanks for the info.

Kirata -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:06:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird So now your own posts are relegated to 'gossip.' Thanks for the info. Help me out here. Are you illiterate, dishonest, or just dumber than a bag of hammers? K.

heavyblinker -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:24:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2017/05/conceptual-penis-hoax-just-big-cock/ Good article, bad journal, moronic thread. That is all.

BoscoX -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:26:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2017/05/conceptual-penis-hoax-just-big-cock/ Good article, bad journal, moronic thread. That is all. All trolls all the time here any more

Musicmystery -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:30:59 AM)
He addressed the content. You attacked the poster. It gets old.

heavyblinker -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:47:36 AM)
It's really amazing that anyone could buy into the notion that a single paper published for pay in some journal that I know I've never heard of can bring down an entire field of study. It's really not so far removed from FOX news making a headline out of a comment on someone's twitter or a nasty youtuber making a big deal out of some random blog post. Why do people keep falling for these things? Because it confirms whatever narrative they have about something they hate. The journal is probably excited as hell about the free publicity the controversy is bringing them, at least.

BoscoX -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:49:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery He addressed the content. You attacked the poster. It gets old. The word moronic is always on topic in your world Old, indeed

Musicmystery -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:50:26 AM)
And it's now about me again. I must be really important.

BoscoX -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 11:56:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery And it's now about me again. I must be really important. Who used the word "you" first, idiot Here's a clue http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5034515

Musicmystery -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 12:00:04 PM)
Sigh. Thread after thread after thread.

BoscoX -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 12:25:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Sigh. Thread after thread after thread. Yep "You" use the word "you" first, every time, make the thread prsonal Then "you" pretend to be a victim when "you" get the reply "you" probably expect Thread after thread after thread.

Musicmystery -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 12:35:14 PM)
Right. Because "All Trolls" doesn't refer to anyone. Fucking retard. Go blow yourself.

BoscoX -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 12:46:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Right. Because "All Trolls" doesn't refer to anyone. I was referring to another poster using the word "moronic" in attacking Kirata personally for starting a thread that was unwelcome, for being so devastating to the leftist cult stupidity, as well as all of the other trollishness that can be observed here such as this bit from you Pretend to be the victim all day, sputter your juvenile personal attacks all you like Means nothing to me

heavyblinker -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 12:58:30 PM)
BoscoX-- using his sizable intellect to protect and defend the weak. I know how much you despise conflict, so it must have taken a lot to get you to rush to his defense like that.

BoscoX -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 1:00:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker BoscoX-- using his sizable intellect to protect and defend the weak. I know how much you despise conflict, so it must have taken a lot to get you to rush to his defense like that. Thanks, but we have had more than enough examples of trollish stupidity already to make the point

WhoreMods -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 1:01:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Thanks, but we have had more than enough examples of trollish stupidity already to make the point Obviously: you've posted in this thread a lot.

Kirata -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 1:07:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker It's really amazing that anyone could buy into the notion that a single paper published for pay in some journal that I know I've never heard of can bring down an entire field of study. What's truly "amazing" is that you think someone does. And it also bears mention that whether or not you've ever "heard of" a journal is not a valid metric for evaluating its quality. Does your lamp-socket tell you this shit, or do you make it up yourself? K.

Edwird -> RE: The conceptual penis as a social construct (5/21/2017 2:40:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird So now your own posts are relegated to 'gossip.' Thanks for the info. Help me out here. Are you illiterate, dishonest, or just dumber than a bag of hammers? Oh good gosh, this from a guy who actually searched info on 'conceptual penis'? You need help, certainly, but it's not coming from this corner, I can tell you right now.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625