LadyPact -> RE: I think there should be MORE pro dommes (5/30/2017 10:04:16 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: respectmen If you already have someone and you are angry with unwanted emails, why don't you choose to hide your profile? You do realize there's been an issue recently about mailing hidden profiles? Sometimes, even with people you've had exchanges with before. Never been big on anybody having to sacrifice the good emails that they want to receive, such as from friends and so worth, just because they don't want the other stuff. quote:
ORIGINAL: respectmen Another point, in Lucy's OP she whinges about men not treating her like a human being but seems all okay with pro dommes not treating men as human beings. A pro domme doesn't give a fuck about the men they deal with. If she can't treat him as an ATM machine, she doesn't want anything to do with him, not even simple friendship. She wants your wallet, not your heart. I think this is something that a person has to look at reasonably. How many of the service providers that you use in your life are really your friends? I happen to like the gal who does my nails and get a real kick out of talking with the woman who does my hair. (The latter is a Walking Dead fan, too.) We're not hanging out on the weekends or keeping in touch between appointments. I'm a client. Not a friend. If I wasn't paying them, they wouldn't provide the services for free. quote:
This is what I will never understand about blokes who see pro dommes or hookers, how can they feel turned on over someone who doesn't feel the same about you? A pro domme only wants to play with you for money, not because she really wants to play with you. That right there is an instant erection wrecker. This part, I'm actually going to give you credit on. It's one of the very reasons I never went the pro route, myself. Even when the S/m thing isn't necessarily sexual, (to me, not all of it is) I enjoy it more when it's what I want to do and who I want to do it with. It might just be me but when I feel obligated to play, it's a huge buzz kill. Still, you have to apply the same thinking to other situations. Some people aren't interested in fwb situations. Others love to play but only with people they know very well. Even further, some people have no interest in play at all unless there is a dynamic that includes emotional attachment. Maybe my thinking is outdated but I still see fewer casual players who are female, so that imbalance creates the market. quote:
If one gender doesn't have to pay, neither should the other. Well, that's the thing. You don't *have* to pay. Nobody does. That doesn't mean that other people are going to give you what you want, just because you want it. quote:
ORIGINAL: respectmen Surely, BDSM is roleplay but to think it has anything to do with BDSM when it comes to courting and the usual deal breakers/ judgements the typical women vanilla or not imply to men is being silly. That said, when there is NO relationship or NSA involved, she shouldn't be considered a dominant/mistress to you to begin with. Therefore there should be no submission from the sub and no dominance from the domme when there is no deal to play to begin with. You only get partial credit here. I don't know what kind of BDSM you engage in, but it seems to me that when people get tied up (bondage) they really are bound and when I top people as a sadist, it hurts. I'm pretty sure some of the masochists on this site will tell you that the pain they experience is real. Don't confuse BDSM with D/s. No, you shouldn't consider a person to be your Dominant just because they happen to be "A" Dominant. Same applies the other way around. There is no sub on this site that is "MY" sub just because they happen to be submissive. I am going to tell you from personal observation that there is a lot of "any Domme will do" mentality. That doesn't work when if you are dealing with someone who wants an actual relationship where the fun stuff is only a part of that.
|
|
|
|