RE: Huh...

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Huh...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Huh...

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Huh... - 6/1/2017 8:42:03 PM

vincentML

Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

And we didn't create terrorists, Mohammad and the Koran created terrorists. Realpolitik has had a hand in our relationships here and there but the creating terrorists business is all on Islam itself and nobody else

Terrorism reaches back further in history than the birth of Islam. Zealots were a Jewish sect who fought a terrorist insurgency against Roman rule in Jerusalem during the First Century CE.

by th

You really think we are discussing first century CE Jewish terrorists here

Nope, I am pointing out that your fuck buddy Mohammad was not the first terrorist. Both he and the Zealots are ancient and irrelevant history. The current Arab discontent arose from the betrayal imposed on them by the French and British after using them to fight the Ottoman in 1915. Really, you are a jerk if you don't understand the relevant history.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Huh... - 6/2/2017 12:15:15 AM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
The president of Iran is merely the top bureaucrat. The Supreme Leader has all of the real power and he is a fascist theocrat. So this election makes no difference at all.

The Iranian people are starved for a real republic and the theocracy stops that right in its tracks.

Yea, the Supreme Leader is also not interested to start a war with Saudi, you know, the two countries practice two different sects of Islam and they think each other are heresy.

But that's about it.

(in reply to MrRodgers)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Huh... - 6/2/2017 1:36:10 PM

cloudboy

Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

Don't worry, I've never seen one person shed their Hillary hatred -- especially among white men. She would have been a good President, but she'd have been hated, stalked, and villified in ways we hadn't seen v. her husband and Obama.

When there's a two party system, voting for outside third party candidates is an abdication. 3rd party votes remain de facto votes for Trump. That's the math of it.

(in reply to PyrotheClown)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Huh... - 6/2/2017 1:43:03 PM

cloudboy

Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

Good to see you. It kind of looks like a Sanity Toilet bowl here.

Notice how Pyro evicerated Hillary without the use of any identifiable specifics?

SNL recently aired a 1996 show with Jim Cary -- and in Weekend Update of that show (21 years ago) Norm McDonald flashed a picture of Hillary Clinton up on the screen and fired away at her like a ripe target. Her Tombstone in the USA was largely formed after she had the temerity to utter:

"I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession, which I entered before my husband was in public life." (1992)

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 44