Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Trump Pulled Out


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trump Pulled Out Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 4:51:38 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Still figurative

You don't know what Pittsburgh represents to Americans

ive been to pittsburgh often, my ex was from there, and i know quite a bit about it, not to mention Ive seen the pens and the steelers play, more than once..been to a couple of fet events and a few house parties there too, had a bloody marvellous time. so guess again. Ive even read books, history, n shit too

pbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbth
ahem back to adult mocking mode


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 5:08:15 PM   
AtUrCervix


Posts: 2111
Joined: 1/15/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Trump Pulled Out


And the thing is, she didn't even notice. ~ other than the orange walrus blubber rolling aside . . .





Hahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahaha

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 5:09:30 PM   
AtUrCervix


Posts: 2111
Joined: 1/15/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

once the thrust is gone....its over


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 5:25:43 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

When there's hardly anything of substance, 'thrust and grunt' is all that's left.

Story of our life, nowadays.

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 5:28:04 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

once the thrust is gone....its over



smirk

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 6:02:43 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Didn't Onan get in trouble with God in Genesis 38:9 for pulling out?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 6:31:17 PM   
AtUrCervix


Posts: 2111
Joined: 1/15/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Didn't Onan get in trouble with God in Genesis 38:9 for pulling out?


That was Leviticus 7..."Thou shalt not thrust without my Genesis"

(Leviticus 7).

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 8:57:42 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Trump cited a slew of statistics from a study that was funded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Council for Capital Formation, foes of the Paris Accord.

I have never known the orange impotence to tell the truth

Mr. Trump justified his decision by saying that the Paris agreement was a bad deal for the United States, buttressing his argument with a cornucopia of dystopian, dishonest and discredited data based on numbers from industry-friendly sources. Those numbers are nonsense, as is his argument that the agreement would force the country to make enormous economic sacrifices and cause a huge redistribution of jobs and economic resources to the rest of the world
.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/opinion/trump-paris-climate-change-agreement.html


< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 6/1/2017 9:15:58 PM >


_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 10:01:58 PM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Regardless of how you want to look at it, every fucking country in the world believes climate change is a problem, only in the US is there a fucking debate.


Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.

So only in the Entire Scientific Fucking Community (and the US) there is a debate about climate change. The rest of the world seem to of all jumped on the 'Global Warming' bandwagon.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/1/2017 11:01:20 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.

So only in the Entire Scientific Fucking Community (and the US) there is a debate about climate change. The rest of the world seem to of all jumped on the 'Global Warming' bandwagon.


Wow... I've heard a lot of people saying that global warming is wonderful or that it is some sort of conspiracy to destroy the economy for no good reason, but I've never heard someone actually claim that there are scientists who think the planet hasn't even warmed.

Which blog did you get this info from?

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 12:06:57 AM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.

So only in the Entire Scientific Fucking Community (and the US) there is a debate about climate change. The rest of the world seem to of all jumped on the 'Global Warming' bandwagon.


Wow... I've heard a lot of people saying that global warming is wonderful or that it is some sort of conspiracy to destroy the economy for no good reason, but I've never heard someone actually claim that there are scientists who think the planet hasn't even warmed.

Which blog did you get this info from?


Did i say that or did you just assume that?

I think something like 76% of scientists agree on global warming.
36% believe that humans are to blame.
5% believe that the threat is imminent - as in in the next couple hundred years.


(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 3:47:13 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.

So only in the Entire Scientific Fucking Community (and the US) there is a debate about climate change. The rest of the world seem to of all jumped on the 'Global Warming' bandwagon.


Wow... I've heard a lot of people saying that global warming is wonderful or that it is some sort of conspiracy to destroy the economy for no good reason, but I've never heard someone actually claim that there are scientists who think the planet hasn't even warmed.

Which blog did you get this info from?


Did i say that or did you just assume that?

I think something like 76% of scientists agree on global warming.
36% believe that humans are to blame.
5% believe that the threat is imminent - as in in the next couple hundred years.


You said it.

Look:

quote:

Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.


Anyways, it doesn't matter if 76% of 'scientists' agree-- 97.2% of papers published on the subject of climate change by people who know what they're talking about agree that the planet is warming and that humans play some part in that.

And I don't know what you mean by 'the threat is imminent'-- the threat of what? The apocalypse?

< Message edited by heavyblinker -- 6/2/2017 4:01:05 AM >

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 5:19:37 AM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.

So only in the Entire Scientific Fucking Community (and the US) there is a debate about climate change. The rest of the world seem to of all jumped on the 'Global Warming' bandwagon.


Wow... I've heard a lot of people saying that global warming is wonderful or that it is some sort of conspiracy to destroy the economy for no good reason, but I've never heard someone actually claim that there are scientists who think the planet hasn't even warmed.

Which blog did you get this info from?


Did i say that or did you just assume that?

I think something like 76% of scientists agree on global warming.
36% believe that humans are to blame.
5% believe that the threat is imminent - as in in the next couple hundred years.


You said it.

Look:

quote:

Which is really weird because only 5% of scienists actually believe Global Warming is a moderate risk.... and by moderate i mean they view it as an event that will occur with in the next 100 to 500 years.


Anyways, it doesn't matter if 76% of 'scientists' agree-- 97.2% of papers published on the subject of climate change by people who know what they're talking about agree that the planet is warming and that humans play some part in that.

And I don't know what you mean by 'the threat is imminent'-- the threat of what? The apocalypse?



Actually... it is 0.3% of papers published on the subject of Climate Change by people who know what they're talking about agree that the planet is warming and that humans play an integral parts.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-013-9647-9
... the post-modernist assumptions that scientific truth is discernible by measuring a consensus among experts, and that a near unanimous consensus exists. However, inspection of a claim by Cook et al. (Environ Res Lett 8:024024, 2013) of 97.1 % consensus, heavily relied upon by Bedford and Cook, shows just 0.3 % endorsement of the standard definition of consensus: that most warming since 1950 is anthropogenic.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 6:04:34 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

If only Bosco's dad had pulled out...




Much like fundamentalist Muslims, leftists have only their vileness and their hate and their contempt for the Democratic process



Did someone say 'democratic' process? what are you smokin?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 6:44:08 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Actually... it is 0.3% of papers published on the subject of Climate Change by people who know what they're talking about agree that the planet is warming and that humans play an integral parts.


LOL... look at the authors of that paper.
Yes, the insanely corrupt phony Willie Soon, right-wing idiot Christopher Monckton and other stooges will definitely support your position.


http://gawker.com/paid-climate-change-skeptic-even-more-corrupt-than-prev-1687297073

That article is in an education journal with exceptionally low standards, NOT a science journal.

This was published in the same journal:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11191-013-9608-3

It's a joke.

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 7:05:49 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Well they have to embellish the lie don't they for the thick fuks across the pond lapping up demented jobbies screaming, entitled as they are, for sloppy seconds, washed down with a nice glass of angry diarrhoea

Trump cited a slew of statistics from a study that was funded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Council for Capital Formation, foes of the Paris Accord. No shit eh!

I have never known the orange impotence to tell the truth

Mr. Trump justified his decision by saying that the Paris agreement was a bad deal for the United States, buttressing his argument with a cornucopia of dystopian, dishonest and discredited data based on numbers from industry-friendly sources. Those numbers are nonsense, as is his argument that the agreement would force the country to make enormous economic sacrifices and cause a huge redistribution of jobs and economic resources to the rest of the world
.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/opinion/trump-paris-climate-change-agreement.html

He is a complete lying fuk and pathological at that

And the little whiny lying fuk bitch keeps keeps slobbering on about million of eg coal jobs
lie
lie
lie


1. The U.S. is a net exporter of coal. U.S. coal exports, for which Europe is the largest customer, peaked in 2012, and have declined since. In 2015, the U.S. exported 7.0 percent of mined coal.[2]

2. In 2005 coal provided approximately 50% of electricity in the United States and about 92 percent of coal consumption went to electricity generation.[3]:1 However, in 2016, the EIA calculated that coal would provide only 30% of electricity generation nationwide with natural gas providing 34%, nuclear, 19%, and renewables, 15%.[4]

3. By January 2016, more than 25% of coal production was in bankruptcy in the United States.[5] In 2015 four publicly-traded US coal companies filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, including Patriot Coal Corporation, Walter Energy, and the fourth-largest Alpha Natural Resources filed for bankruptcy protection. The second-largest producer Arch Coal and the largest producer Peabody Energy declared bankruptcy in 2016.[5][6][7] By March 2017, the coal industry employed approximately 77,000 miners. 60,000 jobs have been lost since 2011

4. By the end of 2016, the coal industry employed approximately 50,000 miners.[20] Compared to 260,000 Americans working in the solar industry

5. Many Republicans have blamed environmental regulations enacted during the ... Although over the past 60 years output of coal more than doubled

No one wants your fuking destroy the planet coal. Demand will continue to fall as the rest of the world shifts to more and more renewables


_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 7:11:22 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
It is clear that Il Douchovitches father didnt pull out. A shame in our country's history.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 7:34:26 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Wouldn't surprise me if the incompetent demented lying fuk did it to detract from from all em Russian investigations.

If you tried to explain the concept of a sun dial to him how long do you think that would take?
If I asked him what he meant when he said one of his less dafter things, on the record, global warming is Chinese hoax - and yet that creature made the decision.

And yet he decided he knows what is best for mother earth based on those orange enablers piping their faulty effluent into his pea like brain. More campaign funds, slush funds, back handers, etc, I suppose: there will be no more jobs as demand plummets.

Actually your toiling to keep you're nuclear plants open too arnt you? I only found out the other day 3 mile island was still actually open, but now closing.

And I only found out 1-2 weeks ago Scotland only coal fire plant, Longannet, shut in 2015ish

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 12:11:23 PM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Actually... it is 0.3% of papers published on the subject of Climate Change by people who know what they're talking about agree that the planet is warming and that humans play an integral parts.


LOL... look at the authors of that paper.
Yes, the insanely corrupt phony Willie Soon, right-wing idiot Christopher Monckton and other stooges will definitely support your position.


http://gawker.com/paid-climate-change-skeptic-even-more-corrupt-than-prev-1687297073

That article is in an education journal with exceptionally low standards, NOT a science journal.

This was published in the same journal:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11191-013-9608-3

It's a joke.


You do realize that the Journal it was published in was an Academic Journal which is often considered not only more prodigious, but also more competitive because that paper has to compete for page space against every other category of academia out there which also get's their papers published in that book. Not only that, it also suffers a much strict peer review process and must intentionally be constructed in a critical way in order for it to provide some sort of academic insight or the ability for it to be used in an academic setting.

The 'Scientific Journal' that Cook et al was published in on the other hand deals specifically with publishing papers that have to do with the environment - which means that there is a lot less to compete against, and allows for the Author to review the feed back provided by the peer review, allowing for alterations or editing of his paper during the peer review process. .


But yeah - you're right. It wasn't published in a Scientific Journal.

But if you don't want to accept a peer reviewed counter point which raises these questions...
then just read the paper itself...

Literally the conditions of Cook et al:
We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'.

So rather then reading the papers, observing the research, or even simply browsing over the Conclusion inside each paper - they simply scanned over the Abstract a non-descript inconclusive description of what the paper contains. That is like Reviewing a movie by only reading the tagline printed on a poster, or a book by only reading the information on the backflap.

That is just a stupid approach for any research...

But let us continue - because Cook et al gets worse:
"66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming."

This instantaneously make the paper a lie - How can you have a 97% consensus of all the papers written about global warming if 66.4% of the papers you go through provide no position? So where does this 97% come from?


"Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming."

So basically - 97% of 33.3% of 11 944 abstracts that they went through. agree that global warming is Real and that Humans are the cause...

But do they really?

When people actually went through the paper, they started to reach out to the authors of the papers which where cited in Cook's little lie... Come to find out that a number of their papers are misrepresented or poorly interpreted.

http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/05/97-study-falsely-classifies-scientists.html#Update1

Even the people you demonize "Willie Soon, right-wing idiot Christopher Monckton", which almost always provided an assessment which vividly argues that AGW is fake, found their papers in that study categorized as 'Taking no position' by Cook.


But you're going to keep believing that 97% lie...
Ignore the fact that it is written by an Solar Physicist (not a climate scientist) Evangelical Christian that has intentionally altered and misrepresented data in order to present a gloom and doom situation which is gobbled up by idiots and politicians alike. That's the status quo for you isn't it?


(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Trump Pulled Out - 6/2/2017 12:17:18 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
FR

Our Brexit: What President Trump saved us from -

quote:



Dropping out of the agreement will let the U.S. avoid several deleterious effects of the agreement.

1. Goodbye to ‘American Last.’ The Paris agreement was basically an attempt to halt climate change on the honor system. Its only legal requirements were for signatories to announce goals and report progress, with no international enforcement mechanism. As a result, it was likely that the United States and wealthy European nations would have adopted and implemented severe climate change rules while many of the world’s governments would avoid doing anything that would slow their own economies. The agreement basically made the U.S. economy and Europe’s strongest economies sacrificial lambs to the cause of climate change.

2. Industrial Carnage. The regulations necessary to implement the Paris agreement would have cost the U.S. industrial sector 1.1 million jobs, according to a study commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. These job losses would center in cement, iron and steel, and petroleum refining. Industrial output would decline sharply.

3. Hollowing Out Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. The industrial carnage would have been concentrated on four states, according to the Chamber of Commerce study. Michigan’s GDP would shrink by 0.8 percent and employment would contract by 74,000 jobs. Missouri’s GDP would shrink by 1 percent. Ohio’s GDP would contract 1.2 percent. Pennsylvania’s GDP would decline by 1.8 percent and the state would lose 140,000 jobs.

4. Smashing Small Businesses, Helping Big Business. Big businesses in America strongly backed the Paris climate deal. In fact, the backers of the climate deal reads like a “who’s who” of big American businesses: Apple, General Electric, Intel, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, General Mills, Walmart, DuPont, Unilever, and Johnson & Johnson. These business giants can more easily cope with costly regulations than their smaller competitors and many would, in fact, find business opportunities from the changes required. But smaller businesses and traditional start-ups would likely be hurt by the increased costs of compliance and rising energy costs.

5. Making America Poorer Again. A Heritage Foundation study found that the Paris agreement would have increased the electricity costs of an American family of four by between 13 percent and 20 percent annually. It forecast a loss of income of $20,000 by 2035. In other words, American families would be paying more while making less.

6. Much Poorer. The overall effect of the agreement would have been to reduce U.S. GDP by over $2.5 trillion and eliminate 400,000 jobs by 2035, according to Heritage’s study. This would exacerbate problems with government funding and deficits, make Social Security solvency more challenging, and increase reliance on government’s spending to support households.
The Paris deal was, in short, a disaster for America and a nothing-burger for climate.

http://www.breitbart.com/economics/2017/05/31/every-bad-thing-avoided-rejecting-paris-climate-accords/


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trump Pulled Out Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109