Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Hillary . . . in the wrong forum


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Hillary . . . in the wrong forum Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 2:50:25 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix
....was on C-Span on (last) Thursday explaining how she's not upset that she lost just that....she "lost (her) opportunity to have a voice in the message".

"My Dad was a small business man ("log cabin"), my Mom was a stay at home Mom ("olden days....better days when one worker could support a family....my family suffered...we didn't have much")

Turns out Mom had a college degree, did quite well for herself...made a name....Dad was a hard worker....they had a FINE home....live in the better parts of town.

YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN.


She grew up a Republican and was a HS volunteer for Goldwater, voted for three Republican congressmen, you effing idiot. Your first time around the block, here?

You are welcome to elucidate for the audience here why Hillary's daddy's money (if not much) pisses you off more than Trump's daddy's money.


< Message edited by Edwird -- 6/7/2017 2:56:26 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 2:58:55 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
reaches for his big stick oo a trick question eh!

Is it because Comrade orange is a complete lying cunt?

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 3:15:03 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

In a country where some people like to make a lot of money and think it as capitalist piety (economics is a fuck of a lot more boring than religion, so I can to a degree understand the sentiment at play), . . .

Every once in awhile it gets vicious.

If making a lot of money doesn't make you happy enough, the only thing left is to attack people who make less money for not making more money.

Even though Hillary will never be meaningful in any significant way . . .

HER DADDY DIDN'T MAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS TRUMP'S DADDY!

And that can NEVER be forgiven.

Ever.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 3:21:31 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
But at least you can say that Hillary's daddy wasn't living on the streets. Even worse, if Hillary ever made two dollars or sold Girl Scout cookies, she's a hypocrite.

Coz being commie, etc.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 3:36:33 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
oh come on edwird even I know you aint a thicko - Now I am not so sure?

Hillary someone V Trump - king of the fake news and king hypocrites - do you wish a list 100s of pages long.

Begin

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 4:14:20 PM   
PyrotheClown


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/18/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix
....was on C-Span on (last) Thursday explaining how she's not upset that she lost just that....she "lost (her) opportunity to have a voice in the message".

"My Dad was a small business man ("log cabin"), my Mom was a stay at home Mom ("olden days....better days when one worker could support a family....my family suffered...we didn't have much")

Turns out Mom had a college degree, did quite well for herself...made a name....Dad was a hard worker....they had a FINE home....live in the better parts of town.

YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN.


She grew up a Republican and was a HS volunteer for Goldwater, voted for three Republican congressmen, you effing idiot. Your first time around the block, here?

You are welcome to elucidate for the audience here why Hillary's daddy's money (if not much) pisses you off more than Trump's daddy's money.



Bill was the best republican the democrats ever put into office,balanced the budget(partially by lowering subsidies to welfare and EPA,that and bypassing lots of regulation with nafta,good bye american manufacturing,hello bigger profits),got in a few quick wars and all the while maintaining extra circular activities at the office....He even go impeached,how republican can you get ?!?

Hillary is a Margret Thatcher light.

She latched on to two issue's that alienated her from people my age(30-35)back in the early 00's.

Most older folks won't know what the fuck I'm talking bout,but let me explain.

Imagine yer a youngster (just outta elementary but not still a kid) just starting to form some sort of political consciousness.
Youngster's aint pay'n bill's,youngster's don't care bout most important issues cause they have no clue,their youngsters.
They're just starting to have enough of an attention span to switch on C-Span for a few minutes...maybe...if there's nothing on MTV...

One of the things they do care bout(because they have experience of sorts) is what forms of art they have to enrich their live's in their formative years,and in those early years of the new millennium,that form of art was video game's(a whole era of disposable income and cheap Chinese electronics,aka,the Clinton/Bush era) .Well guess who was on the TV trying to censor video game's,you guessed it,Hillary Clinton.Not an important issue,but one that definitely helped alienate her from nearly a whole generation of folks who saw her as outta touch.

Most of us played violent video games and were bout a violent as those folks in 1400's with those violent stage plays bout bloody gang fights and love triangles.

The other thing that lost her youngster support,her stance on Gay marriage.
Most of us,any generation,have met dykes and queers in our formative years.
Whether or not our society was accepting of it or not ,they were among us the whole gawd damn time,we just pretended they weren't.
By the early 00's most of society was either kool with it,or hopelessly fundamentalist ass hats.
I remember attending a gay marriage myself as a lil kid.
Asked my mah the expected question"but they're both boys mommy",she told me "some boy's like other boy's"
I went "huh"and went back to playing with my lego's because Unlike what some conservatives believe,it's really no big deal till you make it one

Guess who was on the TV, spouting bullshit bout Marriage being as old as time and between only a man and a woman...

Now I know that she never actually stood in the way of gay marriage,but she sure made certain to be seen on TV doing so,and that was enough to alienate her from a bunch of dumb youngsters who were sitt'n down with their folks every night to watch queer eye for the straight guy.

Really,what as the democratic party thinking? When yer left party candidate is less progressive then basic cable,you done fucked up.

I keep hearing demopublicans ranting bout how the republican mud slinging machine was unleashed unfairly at Hillary from the start,and while that might be true,she's done plenty mud wallowing herself.

Oh and the war,almost forgot bout that mess,you know,the thing that started back when I was just coming to "Fight'n Age".
Yeah,the Iraq war isn't exactly popular with alota folks my age(that includes more then a few my age who went over there)
The republican candidate was the one who called the Iraq war the dangerous mistake it was and the dem's thought it'd be a good idea to nominate their one and only candidate who voted for it.

fucking brilliant......

Oh,She was cuddly as fuck with bank's too. Almost forgot bout that.
Just a few years after the housing bubble collapsed,and many youngsters still have fresh memories of family foreclosure in their heads.

All the while, Hillary was like"how do I get younger voter's to vote for me ."

I could go on and on on how fucking stupid it was to put a nervous dweeb on the ticket as a vp candidate.
Or how stupid it was not to campaign in the rust belt,the place worse hit by the Nafta agreements(and foreclosures).
I'm not even going to touch how bad an Idea it was to push the other side's ticket so far right to look as palatable as possible
(really like how both sides argue bout who released the emails and why,but not what's actually ON the emails.)
Not even gonna mention how dumb it was to spend so much on Hillary,but so little on down ticket races

I'm just going to state the obvious fact that she was a massively horrible pick for a candidate if you wanted to secure the 21-35 demographic,Or the 35-55 blue collar demographic ,Or actual progressives.... Or texas rednecks,but for some reason she still spent alot more time and money to court them then she should have.......

Fucking Hell People,What did you expect to happen?!

Don't get me wrong,I dislike Trump even more then I dislike Hillary,I just can't shake the feeling that Hillary is directly responsible for handing over the white house keys to the louse.

I expect Putin to get involved with our elections,he's an exKGB goon turned international kingpin,I'd be shocked if he wasn't trying to get involved.

I expect the republicans to turn a blind eye to all sorts of lunacy if it allows them to rape and pillage,that's what they are,pirates in suits .

I just didn't expect the democrats to fuck them selves over sooo badly.

It reminds me of the change that happened to the republican party back at the turn of the 1900's.The republican party used to be the progressive voice of the working class till they started taking more and more money from the financial elite's.By the middle of the century,they were calling for the oppression of the very people they were trying to liberate just a little over a half century earlier.

That's what the democrats are doing now,they're bending to the will of wall street in order to gain more power against their republican opposition,and it cost them the whole damn election.
So now,their either gonna wise up and change,or double down and get even dirtier next time,we'll see what cards the party play's next election..

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 5:20:06 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix
....was on C-Span on (last) Thursday explaining how she's not upset that she lost just that....she "lost (her) opportunity to have a voice in the message".

"My Dad was a small business man ("log cabin"), my Mom was a stay at home Mom ("olden days....better days when one worker could support a family....my family suffered...we didn't have much")

Turns out Mom had a college degree, did quite well for herself...made a name....Dad was a hard worker....they had a FINE home....live in the better parts of town.

YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN.


She grew up a Republican and was a HS volunteer for Goldwater, voted for three Republican congressmen, you effing idiot. Your first time around the block, here?

You are welcome to elucidate for the audience here why Hillary's daddy's money (if not much) pisses you off more than Trump's daddy's money.

Highest ever candidates disapproval rating by both on election day...Trump being a tad higher than HRC

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 5:27:14 PM   
PyrotheClown


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/18/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix
....was on C-Span on (last) Thursday explaining how she's not upset that she lost just that....she "lost (her) opportunity to have a voice in the message".

"My Dad was a small business man ("log cabin"), my Mom was a stay at home Mom ("olden days....better days when one worker could support a family....my family suffered...we didn't have much")

Turns out Mom had a college degree, did quite well for herself...made a name....Dad was a hard worker....they had a FINE home....live in the better parts of town.

YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN.


She grew up a Republican and was a HS volunteer for Goldwater, voted for three Republican congressmen, you effing idiot. Your first time around the block, here?

You are welcome to elucidate for the audience here why Hillary's daddy's money (if not much) pisses you off more than Trump's daddy's money.

Highest ever candidates disapproval rating by both on election day...Trump being a tad higher than HRC

And people wonder why I "threw away my vote" on a third party candidate....for the second time in a row
Fuck both parties

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 6:08:22 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PyrotheClown
The other thing that lost her youngster support,her stance on Gay marriage.


What happened was that Reagan set the bar so incredibly low that any Democrat after him could get away with the most idiotic crap and think they look better. And in comparison, they did.

Before Reagan (I was there), marijuana was getting to the point of national legalization. "Gay marriage" wasn't even a concept at the time because we were also getting to the point of "who gives a shit?" about gay or lez in the first place. And people then were more increasingly disinterested in the notion of 'official marriage' at all.

Reagan cut all that off as first official acts and new introduced legislation; he fired all the air traffic controllers for being on strike in protest to forced overtime with out overtime pay; marijuana sales were now a federal crime; "Three strikes, you're out" and other mandatory sentencing rules, etc., while lowering standards as to what was a felony re drug laws. From the guy who spoke all about "Freedom!" and "Individual liberty!"

A bunch of fuck-face flatulence that got somebody elected, then put into action.

Sorta like now.

Reagan openly invited the rabid-but-jovial Jerry Falwell into the mix. He invited the sober-and-sage-looking lunatic Alan Greenspan and sought his advice on how best to fuck with poor people without making it obvious. Hence the genius recommendation of the (then) new medicare deduction from even the smallest paychecks.

The reason Reagan kept Paul Volker on as fed chairman rather than appoint his econ-destructionista Greenspan too early is because he wanted to take advantage of Volker's fight against inflation to "spend, spend, spend!" like a mo fo on armaments, so as to to feed his handlers and his masters well, fulfilling his lifelong ambition of being the maitre d' handing out tax-funded menus to defense contractors and other 'Captains of Industry.'

People didn't have 14-15% interest rate mortgages back then because of Volker's sole discretion and volition. It's because things went in reverse direction than normal, as when every time Volker had to raise interest rates yet again in response to all this inflationary spending, Reagan's boys said "Great! We can spend more now!"

There is SO much more, but suffice it to say that the ball got rolling in lowering all standards of society or civility from Reagan onward, which consequentially made it seemingly impossible since to come up with a candidate on either side that doesn't make a thinking person cringe.



< Message edited by Edwird -- 6/7/2017 6:29:36 PM >

(in reply to PyrotheClown)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 6:12:45 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PyrotheClown


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix
....was on C-Span on (last) Thursday explaining how she's not upset that she lost just that....she "lost (her) opportunity to have a voice in the message".

"My Dad was a small business man ("log cabin"), my Mom was a stay at home Mom ("olden days....better days when one worker could support a family....my family suffered...we didn't have much")

Turns out Mom had a college degree, did quite well for herself...made a name....Dad was a hard worker....they had a FINE home....live in the better parts of town.

YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN.


She grew up a Republican and was a HS volunteer for Goldwater, voted for three Republican congressmen, you effing idiot. Your first time around the block, here?

You are welcome to elucidate for the audience here why Hillary's daddy's money (if not much) pisses you off more than Trump's daddy's money.

Highest ever candidates disapproval rating by both on election day...Trump being a tad higher than HRC

And people wonder why I "threw away my vote" on a third party candidate....for the second time in a row
Fuck both parties

And even that does no good. Presidents are puppets. As I keep trying to tell you kinkroids, the real power is behind the throne.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to PyrotheClown)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 10:15:45 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
So informative.

So original.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/7/2017 11:41:10 PM   
PyrotheClown


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/18/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

There is SO much more, but suffice it to say that the ball got rolling in lowering all standards of society or civility from Reagan onward, which consequentially made it seemingly impossible since to come up with a candidate on either side that doesn't make a thinking person cringe.





The grass is allways greener heh lol
It reminds me of a personal favorite Douglas Adams quote,

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.
To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

I can't argue that Reagan was horrible...HORRIBLE .....at being anything but a propped up stooge for what ever mad scheme his handlers had planned,but I don't think he was the great turning point,just the most recent false prophet.

There's all ways been horrible presidents.W.G.Harding & Grant comes to mind,Jackson was a mad man,a murderous madman but at least I can respect him.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Hillary . . . in the wrong forum - 6/8/2017 12:29:17 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
But if talking about the '90s or how things are turning out nowadays, Reagan was indeed the turning point. Again, because the bar was so lowered from then on.

Deregulation of the rules concerning media cross-ownership combined with relaxation of anti-trust rules about corporate mergers, resulting in reduced competition and increased barriers to entry, made corporate media forever indebted (now 'more bigger' and even more corporate), and thus far less inclined to tell us about anything of consequence.

Pay attention, and just look at how the media so dismissively painted Bernie Sanders as some lovable old codger trying to run for president. And how they eagerly and aggressively paint a serious and very smart Elizabeth Warren as a borderline 'radical,' that estimation derived from her concern about US citizens and the poorly paid among them being sought as prey by financial terrorists. They try to tell us she is 'interesting' for giving a shit at all about US citizens. She is a fucking radical, they try to tell us, but they won't say it exactly, while thinking they are treating her and the readers both in the most kind way.

Democracy succeeds or not based upon an informed society of voters.

It ain't happening here. And that's due to policies implemented from 1981 onwards.



< Message edited by Edwird -- 6/8/2017 12:54:58 AM >

(in reply to PyrotheClown)
Profile   Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Hillary . . . in the wrong forum Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094