RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Musicmystery -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/18/2017 6:07:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And

Trump: 'I am under investigation' in Comey sacking

US president reportedly under investigation for obstruction of justice in connection with Russia collusion probe.

AND OH NO! NOT FOX NEWS!

Trump says he's under investigation, takes swipe at Rosenstein

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/16/trump-on-alleged-russian-collusion-no-proof.html



The OP was written just for you [:D]

Or for people with reading comprehension.




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/18/2017 6:18:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And

Trump: 'I am under investigation' in Comey sacking

US president reportedly under investigation for obstruction of justice in connection with Russia collusion probe.

AND OH NO! NOT FOX NEWS!

Trump says he's under investigation, takes swipe at Rosenstein

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/16/trump-on-alleged-russian-collusion-no-proof.html



The OP was written just for you [:D]

Or for people with reading comprehension.


I know. Bizarre how you keep completely missing the point of articles that are written as simply as that one was




Musicmystery -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/18/2017 7:06:19 PM)

"— but then hedges "

Simpleton.




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/18/2017 7:09:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

"— but then hedges "

Simpleton.


Dear Simpleton,

The lawyer explained perfectly which way is up, and which way is down. That alt left fanatics cum themselves in their circle jerks at the thought that the president acknowledged that the Washington Post pushes fake news at them is irrelevant to the real world




Musicmystery -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/18/2017 8:29:54 PM)

"— but then hedges "

Btw, your boy Trump can't seem to get his story straight either.

The blind leading the blind.




jlf1961 -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/18/2017 8:41:48 PM)

I still think it is funny as hell that some top law firms declined to take him as a client over this because the didn't think he would actually listen and follow legal advice and the attorney that did take the case has no experience in either criminal or senatorial proceedings.

So, the "blind leading the blind" is an apt description.




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 4:52:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
roceedings.

So, the "blind leading the blind" is an apt description.


I am sure you know a lot about that




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 4:57:30 AM)


FR

It's the "Trump Justice Department" now...

How convenient [;)]

quote:

Rosenstein prods media for ‘anonymous allegations’ on Russia probe

A top Trump Justice Department official issued an unusual, vague statement Thursday night, casting doubt on a series of recent media reports detailing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s growing probe into the Trump campaign for potential collusion with Russia in the 2016 campaign.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appeared to be taking issue with recent Washington Post and New York Times stories that President Donald Trump himself is now the subject of an obstruction of justice probe, as well as a separate new report from the Post that Mueller is looking into White House senior adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner’s finances.


Rosenstein’s statement, though, mentioned none of the reports specifically. Instead, he criticized articles that were attributed to unnamed officials.

“Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous ‘officials,’ particularly when they do not identify the country — let alone the branch or agency of government — with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated,” Rosenstein said. “Americans should be skeptical about anonymous allegations. The Department of Justice has a long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations.”

Rosenstein’s statement caught many in Washington off guard, in part because it was so generic and didn’t actually specify which news reports it was addressing. It’s also notable because of who issued it: With Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused from all things related to the Russia probe, Rosenstein as the No. 2 DOJ official has the reins over the Mueller probe. He’ll get Mueller’s budget and he also has the power to block major investigative steps — with the caveat he must report to Congress if that happens.



And Mueller is either a lying political hack, or he has made sure there were no leaks as the Washington Post tries to claim:

quote:

Mueller’s office declined to comment on the Post and Times reports over the last 24 hours, but spokesman Peter Carr also weighed in on the recent leaks that have caused consternation in Trump’s White House.

“The special counsel’s office has undertaken stringent controls to prohibit unauthorized disclosures that deal severely with any member who engages in this conduct," he said.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/15/rod-rosenstein-media-russia-anonymous-allegations-239622


And, what is so "unusual" about calling Washington Post fake news, exactly what it is - fake news




bounty44 -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 5:23:22 AM)

just a quick note to everyone...

what youre all fighting about are nuances in language, conflating multiple conversations about slightly different things, and/or missing key words in context.

and if you comrades weren't so quick to assign evil machinations to your political enemies, and operating along the lines of conclusions looking for evidence, you might be wise enough to discern that.




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 5:36:01 AM)


What this is about, is, the Washington Post dropped another fake news nothingburger into the mix to get their Bernie Bra who shot up the softball game off of the front pages




bounty44 -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 5:46:13 AM)

some might indeed be that, but its also what I said--the comrades' inability to discern differences. to give them a little slack, theres so much "out there" that its difficult to keep track of things. to criticize them roundly however---everything is so much red meat to them.




mnottertail -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 5:57:01 AM)

there is there there.

I dont see an obstruction of justice legally. Its fuel for the impeachment though.




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 5:59:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

some might indeed be that, but its also what I said--the comrades' inability to discern differences. to give them a little slack, theres so much "out there" that its difficult to keep track of things. to criticize them roundly however---everything is so much red meat to them.


Granted

Now they're at a crossroads

They've fed the useful idiot alt left crowd enough red meat that they are becoming violent. Which way will their media masters go from here, do you think




mnottertail -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 6:02:31 AM)

you're kidding right? the rightist nutsuckers are violent goons and thugs, they splash the news constantly.




Musicmystery -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 6:36:03 AM)

Look, as I said before, if your position is that Trump is a liar and/or clueless, I can't disagree.

In this case, even FOX News (link already provided) is apparently "Fake news."

But then, your definition of Fake News is "stuff I don't want to believe or admit."

Trump made 488 false or misleading claims in his first 100 days in office




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 7:07:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Look, as I said before, if your position is that Trump is a liar and/or clueless, I can't disagree.

In this case, even FOX News (link already provided) is apparently "Fake news."

But then, your definition of Fake News is "stuff I don't want to believe or admit."

Trump made 488 false or misleading claims in his first 100 days in office


Rolling around in VOX now, dog? [:D]

Funny




mnottertail -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 7:12:03 AM)

The actual report is WaPo. But you cant read while felchgobbling putinjizz. matter of perspective.




BoscoX -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 7:18:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The actual report is WaPo. But you cant read while felchgobbling putinjizz. matter of perspective.


Your shit-for-brains little troll friend is smarter than you

He knows that WP is proven fake news so he went to a feed that seems more legitimate, now you fucked it up for him




mnottertail -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 7:22:47 AM)

oh, actually pedophile, WaPo has a much better record than you and your putinjizz felchgobbling nutsucker slobberblogs. You are a retard, means youre not very sharp. You are very good at being a fat, old, retarded, putinjizz felchgobbling pedophile nutsucker compound gimp, but after that you aint got a fucking thing going for you.




Musicmystery -> RE: Trump lawyer insists there is no obstruction investigation (6/19/2017 7:23:24 AM)

"Fake news" = "Nuh-uh!"




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875