Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Has anyone noticed this?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Has anyone noticed this? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Has anyone noticed this? - 6/19/2017 5:20:54 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
In the US, a mass shooting, bombing etc motivated by religion is considered an act of terrorism, either domestic or otherwise.

However, if it is motivated due to race or sexual orientation, it is labeled a hate crime.

Now, and I am just spit balling here, but since the end desired result is to cause a sense of fear among those of the targeted group, would not the term terrorism be applicable?

By US legal definition, the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

While hate crimes do have a very harsh penalty, terrorism, even for those only guilty of aiding those committing the act, carries much harsher penalties, up to and including a death sentence.

My question, is since the end desired result is the same, why the hell dont they count as the same type of crime?

Both are basically motivated by hate, or hate inspired ideologies, so why not both be treated as such?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/19/2017 5:44:30 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
I think because terrorism is supposed to have a political motivation.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/19/2017 6:01:31 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

I think because terrorism is supposed to have a political motivation.

They were named in different decades.
Terrorism is (bot openly) concidered an act of war.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/19/2017 9:29:28 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
Fr
Terrorism is political. It's against ideas.

Hate Crime against races is different. It's not against ideas. It's against skin colour which cannot be changed.

Beliefs and Ideas like religion can be changed.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/19/2017 10:42:50 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
Terrorism doesn't need any political motivation to back it up. It's self explanatory that terrorism is the act of spreading terror. It can be for any motivation at all, or none at all. For example; The mercenaries spread terror in Katanga but that had nothing to do with politics. It was so that everybody was scared of them and wouldn't put up much of a fight.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 12:05:43 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Terrorism doesn't need any political motivation to back it up. It's self explanatory that terrorism is the act of spreading terror. It can be for any motivation at all, or none at all. For example; The mercenaries spread terror in Katanga but that had nothing to do with politics. It was so that everybody was scared of them and wouldn't put up much of a fight.


Then we would have to call all the activities Triads and Gangsters do as Terrorism too, as that's what they regularly do! Terrorise people so they don't put up a fight and surrender all their money.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 12:17:57 AM   
HaveRopeWillBind


Posts: 514
Joined: 7/15/2006
Status: offline
Terrorism is an attempt to change the political system. Hate crimes are directed against a particular person or group of persons regardless of their politics. Hate crimes do not have to involve race. For example hate crimes can be directed toward a particular sexual orientation or against a religious group. That can happen to persons of any race.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 12:53:15 AM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
Basically it is the act of using terrorising methods to produce a state of fear. These MAY be used to resist a government or governing methods by acts of deliberate violence but not necessarily so

(in reply to HaveRopeWillBind)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 2:49:53 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Using FR, since you asked I shall opine but I don't know how much of an answer it will be.

In trying to define hate crimes and terrorism the government is going into uncharted territory. Much as I hate to reference a work of fiction, it reminds me of an episode of Star Trek Voyager in which one of the crew members is actually arrested for a simple thought. Someone tripped into her and for a split second she thought she would like to smack this asshole upside the head and good, but did not do it realising that (well they thought) it was a simple accident. They had a machine that could read your thoughts, today's government does not.

Today they can only read intent by the results and nature of the action. I use this technique extensively on what "they" do and it seems to be holding up pretty well. So let's examine a few types of crimes.

We can start in my own 'hood here where there was a death involved with an armed robbery. Guy came in to rob the local gas/beer station and the owner who was working at the time had a CCW and was armed. A CCW here does have a bit of a test of marksmanship and then you got some people who just can shoot. The owner of the business shot the perp in the arm and the legs to stop them, not wanting to take a life if it is avoidable. However the perp turned around and shot him dead. While this serves as a good lesson to always shoot to kill, that is not the point here.

In this case the perp was only trying to get away with some loot. He had no feelings for the owner either way, merely an obstacle to his gains by crime. So the government does not consider this a hate crime. Hey, ask this criminal if he would shoot his Mother, and 90 % that he would say no. He can go around thinking anyone who is not his Mother is a piece of meat and can be killed at will for a couple hundred bucks ? thinking of people as nothing is not hate ? Not respecting their right to life is not hate ?

Let's take a roll down to Boston and the Boston marathon. Some people, who obviously had no love for the US or its Citizens used some nice insidious bombs (and taught a few of us something) to kill a few people at random. Now if I were su0er rich I could be somewhat of a recluse, I havee no use for the outdoors at al, that is why we build houses. If I had a PC and internet I could live without ever going outside and with very little is any human interaction. But some other people like to go running around for their health and whatever reason and I have to stand for their rights as well, so ignoring it is not an option.

The killers at the Boston Marathon had no specific targets really, but they still had goals. They may have had valid reason to "take out as many of these MFs as possible" but there were no specific targets. This is something I believe the letter of the law would classify as a hate crime or terrorism. However for terrorism usually you would think there is a political goal. Actually maybe there was, as in "STOP BOMBING OUR PEOPLE BACK TO THE STONE AGE, WE DON'T EVEN HAVE ANY STONES ANYMORE, BUT WE CANNOT TAKE ANYMORE,, GET OUT OF OUR LANDS".

And this is where I come at odds with some USians. We fucked with them people and we fucked with them bad. In the middle east it started in 1948 ad only got worse. For South America it started i the late 1890s and they also never forget and that is why you got that poison HFCS in your soft drink instead of the usual sugar. Yes they hate our guts but I know why. You cannot excuse the actions of the military of this country.

The US will never stop using the military to extract resources from other countries. In the old days the People would get a piece of the action but we do not, only a handful of people who pay the lobbyists get the spoils of war. And We The People get the flack. And it will get worse.

Remember another piece of fiction known as "The Burning Bed" with IIRC Farrah Faucet ? After years of abuse she kills her olman. All those years of abuse of course must have instilled some hate in her, so does that mean that she should get a stiffer sentence because of it ? So are they saying to love your abuser and just let it happen ? Where does that liberal crock of shit end ?

I have talked about people needing to be boiled in bacon grease but that is a long fall from actually doing it. But if you come climbing in my back window at night you get shot. With some actually correct court rulings sure I shoot you, but do I hate people who go into others' homes and steal from them ? With the state of the economy these days, not so much necessarily, which I have stated. I might not kill someone who is raiding my deepfreezes, unless they go after my venison tenderloin of course. Seriously, after all I've been through there is still a little bit of human in me.

What if he is Black ?

By all means, let's bring race into this. not so much religion, but countries. Countries the US has fucked with for the gain of the oil companies, like Iran. I am sorry Iranians, but I do not want you here because you hate us and are a potential threat. I am sorry for what we did in 1952 and whatever but I wasn't even alive. And all we commoners got out of it was a couple of cents off a gallon of gasoline. I would vote for people who would leave other countries alone but due to the controlled elections here they can't even get on the ballot.

In the end, once the Trump imigration bans get to the supreme court, all they have to do is read part of the Constitution and he will prevail, those lower courts are in error, probably on purpose because of a liberal agenda. But there is a clause right there in the Constitution that supports his sole right to ban ANYONE FOR ANY REASON from entering this country. There is nothing in there about congressional approval. And that is that.

And the US government is in a unique position to define terrorism because they are the most nasty and prolific terrorists on the planet. How would YOU like it if a foreign agency kidnapped your duly elected President and installed their puppet government ? How would YOU like it if a foreign power assassinated your duly elected President ? How would YOU like it if a foreign government put an embargo on you because you were allied with a different country they didn't like and was literally starving your People ? How would YOU like it if a foreign power decided it was time for a "regime change" in YOUR country ?

Well the US government has done all these things and it is over natural resources to enrich those who pay the lobbyists, and your lives be damned. Simply collateral damage. How would YOU like it ?

I like how the aloof assholes in other countries say "America" is a laughing stock because of Trump. that is a binch of bullshit. This country has a history of alienating populations all over the place to ge ttheir favored governments in, and some of them brutal dictatorships. And supplied with US weapons for free as long as that black gold flows baby. We have no right to say a damn word about human rights, ad even less about this supposed spread of democracy. Democracy means to allow western companies to rape your country of its natural resources. Saddam realized it and that is why without doing a fucking thing he was all the sudden the greatest threat, same with Qadaffi. (however you want to spell it)

It is to the point where if someone came in and deposed the US government I am not so sure I would fight it. After what they have used our tax dollars for in the past hundred or so years I might just side with the other side. I got tired of paying taxes to support big business and all that, at the expense of our People. This is because I have real information on how nasty this government really is. And I am here born and bred. What the fuck do you think other people think ?

We are not laughed at as some of the more feebleminded posters think, we are feared, ad mostly hated. And it wasn't Trump who did it, it was the policies of this bought and paid for government and military for over a hundred years.

You want to talk terrorism ? What are we doing in Syria ? What have we done in Afghanistan ? And that is only for starters. We got about 130 years of history to go through to find why we are so hated in the world.

And even our own. Timothy McVeigh, he was not crazy nor an asshole. What he did, though I disapprove, was REVENGE. Until you understand that you will not understnd where our enemies are coing from.

WE ARE CREATING THEM.

T^T

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 2:56:18 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

My question, is since the end desired result is the same, why the hell dont they count as the same type of crime?

Both are basically motivated by hate, or hate inspired ideologies, so why not both be treated as such?

Yes. A very good question.

Perhaps one key difference is that the perpetrators of hate crimes are all too often to be found among the mainstream of a given society, with little to differentiate them from the rest of the population except their bigotry. They represent the extreme end of social phobias that society has tolerated, even at times encouraged, in the past. We don't have to turn the clock very far back to be back in the days where queers were persecuted by all sectors of society, including the law and the government itself.

While the objective of a hate crime perp doesn't present any real threat to the existing political order, terrorists usually challenge the existing political order in one way or another, often explicitly challenging that order. They usually espouse a cause that is seen as somehow alien or external to that society, though this is not always the case.

Whether these differences amount to enough to justify the differing treatment of offenders is a good question. There are instances where a particular crime can be seen as both a hate crime and an act of terrorism - the current awful incident at Finsbury Park in London being a case in point. So differentiating between the two doesn't make an awful lot of sense in some cases.

_____________________________



(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 3:07:22 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

with little to differentiate them from the rest of the population except their bigotry


Does that include the people our military bombed into the stone age a few times ?

they siply want to kill as many of us as possible. Do you blame them ? We killed their families and friends. People who never did a fucking wrong thing to us.

What's more, when we go into a different country where we have no jurisdiction we are in violation of their laws and commiting an act of war. Would you like to count them up ? Might take a while.

They might be a bit bigoted against USians, but for good reason.

T^T

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 4:50:41 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

with little to differentiate them from the rest of the population except their bigotry


Does that include the people our military bombed into the stone age a few times ?

they siply want to kill as many of us as possible. Do you blame them ? We killed their families and friends. People who never did a fucking wrong thing to us.

What's more, when we go into a different country where we have no jurisdiction we are in violation of their laws and commiting an act of war. Would you like to count them up ? Might take a while.

They might be a bit bigoted against USians, but for good reason.

T^T

My remark "with little to differentiate them from the rest of the population except their bigotry" was about people who commit hate crimes.

As for your point that US foreign policy, and especially military interventions in foreign lands creating terrorists - I agree completely.

At the risk of straying off topic a bit, the best illustration of this phenomenon is Iraq, where prior to the US-led invasion there was no terrorist presence (outside of Saddam Hussein's government). Invasion and foreign occupation triggered a savage response that led to the formation of Al Quada in Iraq and then IS. Without an invasion and occupation to trigger these events, the world might have been spared the hideous IS group and its countless victims, IS might never have existed.

If you were an Iraqi or a Palestinian how would you have reacted to having your country taken over by foreigners or being thrown off your land by foreigners? Most people's reactions would not have included showering the foreigners with rose petals and thank you notes ....


_____________________________



(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 5:16:46 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Terrorism doesn't need any political motivation to back it up. It's self explanatory that terrorism is the act of spreading terror. It can be for any motivation at all, or none at all. For example; The mercenaries spread terror in Katanga but that had nothing to do with politics. It was so that everybody was scared of them and wouldn't put up much of a fight.


Then we would have to call all the activities Triads and Gangsters do as Terrorism too, as that's what they regularly do! Terrorise people so they don't put up a fight and surrender all their money.

And yet, we talk of these gangs as "terrorizing" neighborhoods or even entire nations at times.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 5:18:00 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

with little to differentiate them from the rest of the population except their bigotry


Does that include the people our military bombed into the stone age a few times ?

they siply want to kill as many of us as possible. Do you blame them ? We killed their families and friends. People who never did a fucking wrong thing to us.

What's more, when we go into a different country where we have no jurisdiction we are in violation of their laws and commiting an act of war. Would you like to count them up ? Might take a while.

They might be a bit bigoted against USians, but for good reason.

T^T

If by "they" you mean extremist militant radicals.

If you mean those "not us," not so much.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 5:42:18 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Terrorism doesn't need any political motivation to back it up. It's self explanatory that terrorism is the act of spreading terror. It can be for any motivation at all, or none at all. For example; The mercenaries spread terror in Katanga but that had nothing to do with politics. It was so that everybody was scared of them and wouldn't put up much of a fight.


Then we would have to call all the activities Triads and Gangsters do as Terrorism too, as that's what they regularly do! Terrorise people so they don't put up a fight and surrender all their money.

And yet, we talk of these gangs as "terrorizing" neighborhoods or even entire nations at times.


As leftists change the meaning of words for political purposes society always develops ways to say the same thing, one way or another. Progressives are still communists and useful idiots, for example - intelligent people know that

Pit bulls may terrorize some people, but just because I managed to use the word "terrorize" in the same sentence with "pit bulls" doesn't make pit bulls terrorists.

Actual terrorists have political goals

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 5:47:51 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And yet, we talk of these gangs as "terrorizing" neighborhoods or even entire nations at times.

When gangs do it, it's for money, not for ideology though. Gangs just wanna collect protection money and anyway to extort money out of everybody. They terrorise as in they put fear into people hearts so that they can unofficially be King of whatever area they are terrorising. But ultimately, gangs need people alive so they can extort money out of them. I think killing is their last option.

I think the word "Terrorism" started when the Muslims started killing people not of their religion, or people who do not practice up to their standards of their religion.

And when they took their war cross country into non-Muslim countries.

Usually even religious war may just be like contain within neighbours or some nation.

But this is seriously ISIS versus The World. On that scale, I consider it terrorism.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 7:13:31 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Nonetheless, fact remains, this is just silly word play games to attempt to make terrorism all things Muslim while pretending it's the only flavor of terror.


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 7:16:14 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Nonetheless, fact remains, this is just silly word play games to attempt to make terrorism all things Muslim while pretending it's the only flavor of terror.



I suppose spending most of the '80s insisting that the Taliban, Fenians and Contras were noble freedom fighters against oppression, rather than terrorists, has given the rightards a lot more practice with that sort of doublethink.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 7:25:10 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Nonetheless, fact remains, this is just silly word play games to attempt to make terrorism all things Muslim while pretending it's the only flavor of terror.




Weren't some IRA actions legitimately considered terrorist acts

No one has suggested it's a Muslim thing. The real world argument is that actual terrorism as defined by Webster and traditionally, is politically motivated

Not one toddler who is determined to get another toddler's pacifier or whatever. Not some angry fellow seeking revenge, either. The Bernie bra who shot up the Republican softball game? That may qualify, as it was a political act, and possibly with the goal of terrorizing conservatives in government

Possibly not, depending on the gunman's state of mind, his intent



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Has anyone noticed this? - 6/20/2017 8:42:44 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Nonetheless, fact remains, this is just silly word play games to attempt to make terrorism all things Muslim while pretending it's the only flavor of terror.




Weren't some IRA actions legitimately considered terrorist acts

No one has suggested it's a Muslim thing. The real world argument is that actual terrorism as defined by Webster and traditionally, is politically motivated

Not one toddler who is determined to get another toddler's pacifier or whatever. Not some angry fellow seeking revenge, either. The Bernie bra who shot up the Republican softball game? That may qualify, as it was a political act, and possibly with the goal of terrorizing conservatives in government

Possibly not, depending on the gunman's state of mind, his intent



You got a lot of problems with such a retarded nutsucker definition, all suicide bombers and those who are killed before interrogated in depth and repeatedly disqualified from being labelled terrorist.

Frankly, I dont think its a necessary and sufficient condition of the definition of terrorism.
And I also doubt that the definition of terrorism is settled, it is by force of events going to be rather motile.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Has anyone noticed this? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156