Nice shot eh? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Hillwilliam -> Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 8:18:18 AM)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/record-breaking-canadian-sniper-kills-074923736.html

Jeff, were you that good?




WickedsDesire -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 8:26:24 AM)

Who could shoot someones wee toe off again ? From 3 miles away running like the flying scotsman and blindfolded?




Hillwilliam -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 9:06:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Who could shoot someones wee toe off again ? From 3 miles away running like the flying scotsman and blindfolded?

That was tommie




tj444 -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 10:12:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

https://www.yahoo.com/news/record-breaking-canadian-sniper-kills-074923736.html

Jeff, were you that good?


hmmm... and 3 of the top 5 were Canadian.. pretty good.. oddly enough, Canadian soldiers have always been the best.. just sayin' [:D]

"Give me American supply lines, British planes, German officers and Canadian troops, and I can take over the world."
Erwin Rommel




subrob1967 -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 10:36:58 AM)

FR

If this shot can be verified it's one hell of a shot, not one 99.9% of riflemen could make.




kdsub -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 10:43:02 AM)

Lucky I would think... that's what... 2.64 seconds to target? The only time I keep my head that still is reading posts here.

Butch




Real0ne -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 10:49:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR

If this shot can be verified it's one hell of a shot, not one 99.9% of riflemen could make.



when these guys come in with shots that are better than the best barrel accuracy available which is maybe 1/3 MOA its pure luck.

In other words on a perfect windless day you could clamp the rifle in a vice and it would not hit the target at that distance twise in a row LOL




jlf1961 -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 10:49:58 AM)

It was a remarkable shot, no denying it.

It must be noted however, the rifle in question is a fifty caliber rifle, effective range of five miles, it was after all, initially developed for anti aircraft use.

It is also current practice for sniper teams using this type of weapon to utilize a really neat hand held ballistic computer to help calculate the variables, at those ranges, the math gets very complex.

Now, the really interesting part of this little news item.

According to the Geneva Convention, the fifty caliber round is considered inhumane.

The M2 and the various weapons of similar calibers, are supposed to be relegated to use against vehicles and hardened structures, i.e non human targets.

However, to quote the instructor I had on the Barret fifty, "the weapon can be used against buttons, belt buckles, canteens, or any solid target downrange. If an individual has made the stupid decision to have those items on his person, its his own fault if he gets hurt."

Given that this was a 'sanctioned' operation, the it is an official military record and will stand as such.

However, unofficial claims of longer shots with unofficial proof have circulated through black ops units since the introduction of the fifty sniper rifles. Unofficial claims of US, British AND Canadian shooters of hitting targets at three miles or more have made the round for years, but since any such shot by any such team has never officially been made by any friendly government, they are considered shooters tall tails.

Unofficially, a joint team operating in Afghanistan prior to the official beginning of actual operations, consisting of US Seals, British SAS, and Canadians (probably just along to insure that proper manners were used) with one of the team making a kill shot at 3.7 miles. The target in question was wanted by all three governments, however, the targets condition was subject to the whims of the team that went to retrieve him.

Since no government will confirm or deny the existence of such an operation with a kill order attached, I mean officially seal team six was to bring bin Laden out alive to stand trial, the truth of such myths will never be known.

However, using the now out dated Barret bolt action fifty, I have hit static targets on the range at nearly three miles. I personally know a marine that has used the Barret to hit static targets at just over four miles.

And there is the story of a marine gunny who shot an NVA soldier across the DMZ during the Vietnam conflict using a Ma Deuce.


It must be noted that when shooting on the range, one can choose the conditions, so most variables are negligible.

Finally, the 50 is not the largest rifle ever used for sniping.

During the Soviet Lithuania war, Lithuanian soldiers used 20mm anti tank rifles as sniper rifles, essentially to scare the shit of the soviets.
The Lithuanian troops justification was"
"The soviet soldier thinks he is as invincible as their tanks, so using an anti tank rifle is justified."

Which goes to show it is not a good thing to piss off a Lithuanian.

Still a remarkable shot in very adverse conditions, the Canadian is to be praised.

I suspect, however, his private stash of Canadian whiskey was destroyed by some ISIS activity and he was getting justified revenge. I mean lets face it, it takes a lot to piss off a Canuck, otherwise, he would have politely informed his intended target of his soon to be arriving death.




Nnanji -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 12:58:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It was a remarkable shot, no denying it.

It must be noted however, the rifle in question is a fifty caliber rifle, effective range of five miles, it was after all, initially developed for anti aircraft use.

It is also current practice for sniper teams using this type of weapon to utilize a really neat hand held ballistic computer to help calculate the variables, at those ranges, the math gets very complex.

Now, the really interesting part of this little news item.

According to the Geneva Convention, the fifty caliber round is considered inhumane.

The M2 and the various weapons of similar calibers, are supposed to be relegated to use against vehicles and hardened structures, i.e non human targets.

However, to quote the instructor I had on the Barret fifty, "the weapon can be used against buttons, belt buckles, canteens, or any solid target downrange. If an individual has made the stupid decision to have those items on his person, its his own fault if he gets hurt."

Given that this was a 'sanctioned' operation, the it is an official military record and will stand as such.

However, unofficial claims of longer shots with unofficial proof have circulated through black ops units since the introduction of the fifty sniper rifles. Unofficial claims of US, British AND Canadian shooters of hitting targets at three miles or more have made the round for years, but since any such shot by any such team has never officially been made by any friendly government, they are considered shooters tall tails.

Unofficially, a joint team operating in Afghanistan prior to the official beginning of actual operations, consisting of US Seals, British SAS, and Canadians (probably just along to insure that proper manners were used) with one of the team making a kill shot at 3.7 miles. The target in question was wanted by all three governments, however, the targets condition was subject to the whims of the team that went to retrieve him.

Since no government will confirm or deny the existence of such an operation with a kill order attached, I mean officially seal team six was to bring bin Laden out alive to stand trial, the truth of such myths will never be known.

However, using the now out dated Barret bolt action fifty, I have hit static targets on the range at nearly three miles. I personally know a marine that has used the Barret to hit static targets at just over four miles.

And there is the story of a marine gunny who shot an NVA soldier across the DMZ during the Vietnam conflict using a Ma Deuce.


It must be noted that when shooting on the range, one can choose the conditions, so most variables are negligible.

Finally, the 50 is not the largest rifle ever used for sniping.

During the Soviet Lithuania war, Lithuanian soldiers used 20mm anti tank rifles as sniper rifles, essentially to scare the shit of the soviets.
The Lithuanian troops justification was"
"The soviet soldier thinks he is as invincible as their tanks, so using an anti tank rifle is justified."

Which goes to show it is not a good thing to piss off a Lithuanian.

Still a remarkable shot in very adverse conditions, the Canadian is to be praised.

I suspect, however, his private stash of Canadian whiskey was destroyed by some ISIS activity and he was getting justified revenge. I mean lets face it, it takes a lot to piss off a Canuck, otherwise, he would have politely informed his intended target of his soon to be arriving death.

Assuming the guy being shot is 5'-9". Hitting a target that tall at 3450 yards is about a minute and a half of angle. As long as the bullet had the mass and BC to carry that far in a stable condition, it's not that difficult...with today's ballistic calculators...to make a minute and a half shot. I'm not trying to diminish the shot at all. Just seeing the guy through the atmosphere would be a task. A MacMillan Tac-50 would certainly shoot to a minute and a half. Hell, my cheapo app down loaded to my phone calls checks NOAA local weather and compares it to weather where and when the specified load was tested and loaded into the calculator. What the army has is much better and now they're pretty much integral to the scope and bush button quick. Also, with a ten second time of flight any small local little gust of wind would have made a miss likely. So it seems either the conditions were stable over that distance or he walked in the round.




BamaD -> RE: Nice shot eh? (6/22/2017 3:04:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It was a remarkable shot, no denying it.

It must be noted however, the rifle in question is a fifty caliber rifle, effective range of five miles, it was after all, initially developed for anti aircraft use.

It is also current practice for sniper teams using this type of weapon to utilize a really neat hand held ballistic computer to help calculate the variables, at those ranges, the math gets very complex.

Now, the really interesting part of this little news item.

According to the Geneva Convention, the fifty caliber round is considered inhumane.

The M2 and the various weapons of similar calibers, are supposed to be relegated to use against vehicles and hardened structures, i.e non human targets.

However, to quote the instructor I had on the Barret fifty, "the weapon can be used against buttons, belt buckles, canteens, or any solid target downrange. If an individual has made the stupid decision to have those items on his person, its his own fault if he gets hurt."

Given that this was a 'sanctioned' operation, the it is an official military record and will stand as such.

However, unofficial claims of longer shots with unofficial proof have circulated through black ops units since the introduction of the fifty sniper rifles. Unofficial claims of US, British AND Canadian shooters of hitting targets at three miles or more have made the round for years, but since any such shot by any such team has never officially been made by any friendly government, they are considered shooters tall tails.

Unofficially, a joint team operating in Afghanistan prior to the official beginning of actual operations, consisting of US Seals, British SAS, and Canadians (probably just along to insure that proper manners were used) with one of the team making a kill shot at 3.7 miles. The target in question was wanted by all three governments, however, the targets condition was subject to the whims of the team that went to retrieve him.

Since no government will confirm or deny the existence of such an operation with a kill order attached, I mean officially seal team six was to bring bin Laden out alive to stand trial, the truth of such myths will never be known.

However, using the now out dated Barret bolt action fifty, I have hit static targets on the range at nearly three miles. I personally know a marine that has used the Barret to hit static targets at just over four miles.

And there is the story of a marine gunny who shot an NVA soldier across the DMZ during the Vietnam conflict using a Ma Deuce.


It must be noted that when shooting on the range, one can choose the conditions, so most variables are negligible.

Finally, the 50 is not the largest rifle ever used for sniping.

During the Soviet Lithuania war, Lithuanian soldiers used 20mm anti tank rifles as sniper rifles, essentially to scare the shit of the soviets.
The Lithuanian troops justification was"
"The soviet soldier thinks he is as invincible as their tanks, so using an anti tank rifle is justified."

Which goes to show it is not a good thing to piss off a Lithuanian.

Still a remarkable shot in very adverse conditions, the Canadian is to be praised.

I suspect, however, his private stash of Canadian whiskey was destroyed by some ISIS activity and he was getting justified revenge. I mean lets face it, it takes a lot to piss off a Canuck, otherwise, he would have politely informed his intended target of his soon to be arriving death.

The .50 was originally a WW1 anti tank round.




Musicmystery -> RE: Nice shot eh? (7/26/2017 7:56:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It was a remarkable shot, no denying it.

It must be noted however, the rifle in question is a fifty caliber rifle, effective range of five miles, it was after all, initially developed for anti aircraft use.

It is also current practice for sniper teams using this type of weapon to utilize a really neat hand held ballistic computer to help calculate the variables, at those ranges, the math gets very complex.

Now, the really interesting part of this little news item.

According to the Geneva Convention, the fifty caliber round is considered inhumane.

The M2 and the various weapons of similar calibers, are supposed to be relegated to use against vehicles and hardened structures, i.e non human targets.

However, to quote the instructor I had on the Barret fifty, "the weapon can be used against buttons, belt buckles, canteens, or any solid target downrange. If an individual has made the stupid decision to have those items on his person, its his own fault if he gets hurt."

Given that this was a 'sanctioned' operation, the it is an official military record and will stand as such.

However, unofficial claims of longer shots with unofficial proof have circulated through black ops units since the introduction of the fifty sniper rifles. Unofficial claims of US, British AND Canadian shooters of hitting targets at three miles or more have made the round for years, but since any such shot by any such team has never officially been made by any friendly government, they are considered shooters tall tails.

Unofficially, a joint team operating in Afghanistan prior to the official beginning of actual operations, consisting of US Seals, British SAS, and Canadians (probably just along to insure that proper manners were used) with one of the team making a kill shot at 3.7 miles. The target in question was wanted by all three governments, however, the targets condition was subject to the whims of the team that went to retrieve him.

Since no government will confirm or deny the existence of such an operation with a kill order attached, I mean officially seal team six was to bring bin Laden out alive to stand trial, the truth of such myths will never be known.

However, using the now out dated Barret bolt action fifty, I have hit static targets on the range at nearly three miles. I personally know a marine that has used the Barret to hit static targets at just over four miles.

And there is the story of a marine gunny who shot an NVA soldier across the DMZ during the Vietnam conflict using a Ma Deuce.


It must be noted that when shooting on the range, one can choose the conditions, so most variables are negligible.

Finally, the 50 is not the largest rifle ever used for sniping.

During the Soviet Lithuania war, Lithuanian soldiers used 20mm anti tank rifles as sniper rifles, essentially to scare the shit of the soviets.
The Lithuanian troops justification was"
"The soviet soldier thinks he is as invincible as their tanks, so using an anti tank rifle is justified."

Which goes to show it is not a good thing to piss off a Lithuanian.

Still a remarkable shot in very adverse conditions, the Canadian is to be praised.

I suspect, however, his private stash of Canadian whiskey was destroyed by some ISIS activity and he was getting justified revenge. I mean lets face it, it takes a lot to piss off a Canuck, otherwise, he would have politely informed his intended target of his soon to be arriving death.

I don't always agree with you, but I generally read what you write and consider it carefully.

I appreciate the thought and detail you put into your posts.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875