Edwird -> RE: How is leftism defined? (6/30/2017 10:37:45 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML None of your choices fit for me. My Leftism (awkward word) is defined by: 1. We have agreed in our social compact that all individuals should be treated as equal members of the species when it comes to the necessities of good health, sufficient food and drinking water, adequate shelter, personal safety, and freedom from persecution and discrimination. 2. The best way to accomplish this is through the agency of government devoted to the people through (a) direct action, and (b) the maintenance of a well regulated market of goods, services, and ideas. 3. The rule of law requires fairness for all regardless of status, fame, or wealth. That's just for starters. No doubt I can add to this later. Well, that definitely rules me out as a leftist, then. My ideology is more patterned after nature, which in my case involves observation of the cycle of life to begin with, and then noticing how the more social animals go about things. The great apes, the dolphins, the hyenas, etc. What I get from all that is that the more highly evolved have a sense of society as their chosen method of survival and propagation of the species. In nature, propagation of the species is a much more powerful force than mere survival of the individual. Just look at your car in pollen season if you want proof of that. For me, the notion of society to begin with is the place to start. The government, the GE or GM corporations, the shoe repairers, the software or apps coders, the Office Depots all legitimate their existence only insofar as they serve society. I know that government and proper regulation are required, but it is not proper government or regulation that does not take into consideration both investor concerns and worker concerns. At the moment, things are too heavily weighted to the former (in the US), no question. But marking business as the enemy is just turning wrong thinking around the other way.
|
|
|
|