Mueller every hire is under scrutiny

Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WickedsDesire -> Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 9:27:47 AM)
Mueller grows his Russia special counsel team, every hire is under scrutiny Robert S. Mueller III was greeted with near universal praise when he was appointed to lead the investigation into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, but as he builds his special counsel team, his every hire is under scrutiny. At least seven of the 15 lawyers Mueller has brought on to the special counsel team have donated to Democratic political candidates, five of them to Hillary Clinton — a fact that President Trump and his allies have eagerly highlighted. These critics also point to some of the lawyers’ history working with clients connected to the Clintons and Mueller’s long history with former FBI director James B. Comey as they question whether those assigned to the investigation can be impartial. Many lawyers and ethics experts say they can see no significant legal or ethical concerns with the team’s political giving or past work, and they note that Trump often misstates the facts as he casts aspersions. But others say the optical problem is a real one that threatens to undermine public confidence in the probe….etc Where we up to on this one anyway?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 10:44:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Where we up to on this one anyway? Still pissing money down a black hole over nothing.

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 10:46:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Where we up to on this one anyway? Still pissing money down a black hole over nothing. If it was good enough for Clinton, then it's good enough for el presidente: at least they've waited until the election was over for this one, which was probably a mistake.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 10:53:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Where we up to on this one anyway? Still pissing money down a black hole over nothing. If it was good enough for Clinton, then it's good enough for el presidente: at least they've waited until the election was over for this one, which was probably a mistake. It's all crap. Nothing is going to come of any of it until enough time has passed that nobody gives a shit anymore anyway. In the meantime, people are getting paid crap-loads of taxpayer money to spank their monkeys until they're told "Nevermind" and go home.

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 11:06:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Where we up to on this one anyway? Still pissing money down a black hole over nothing. If it was good enough for Clinton, then it's good enough for el presidente: at least they've waited until the election was over for this one, which was probably a mistake. It's all crap. Nothing is going to come of any of it until enough time has passed that nobody gives a shit anymore anyway. In the meantime, people are getting paid crap-loads of taxpayer money to spank their monkeys until they're told "Nevermind" and go home. Were you complaining about the millions of federal money that were pissed away "probing Hilary" last year? If not, why is money being wasted on this an issue when that wasn't?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 11:26:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Were you complaining about the millions of federal money that were pissed away "probing Hilary" last year? If not, why is money being wasted on this an issue when that wasn't? My last comment is a general statement about all the cases cropping up over this election. It's all a waste of time and money.

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 11:35:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Were you complaining about the millions of federal money that were pissed away "probing Hilary" last year? If not, why is money being wasted on this an issue when that wasn't? My last comment is a general statement about all the cases cropping up over this election. It's all a waste of time and money. You were complaining when the public money was being spent harassing Clinton rather the tiny-handed, cheeto-faced shitgibbon, then?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 11:40:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Were you complaining about the millions of federal money that were pissed away "probing Hilary" last year? If not, why is money being wasted on this an issue when that wasn't? My last comment is a general statement about all the cases cropping up over this election. It's all a waste of time and money. You were complaining when the public money was being spent harassing Clinton rather the tiny-handed, cheeto-faced shitgibbon, then? I have to actually complain to think it's pointless?

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 11:44:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Were you complaining about the millions of federal money that were pissed away "probing Hilary" last year? If not, why is money being wasted on this an issue when that wasn't? My last comment is a general statement about all the cases cropping up over this election. It's all a waste of time and money. You were complaining when the public money was being spent harassing Clinton rather the tiny-handed, cheeto-faced shitgibbon, then? I have to actually complain to think it's pointless? Not really, but I do wonder why it's more pointless now than it was last year. It's a Neimoller thing, I suppose: if you didn't say anything when they came for the democrat you have no moral right to say more when they come after the republican, dig?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 11:57:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny I have to actually complain to think it's pointless? Not really, but I do wonder why it's more pointless now than it was last year. It's a Neimoller thing, I suppose: if you didn't say anything when they came for the democrat you have no moral right to say more when they come after the republican, dig? Yeah well, it's not any more pointless now than before but you're welcome to spin that around in your head as much as you want. In the meantime, I reserve the right to voice my thoughts when I feel the desire to. Not based on your moral code.

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 12:03:51 PM)
You can't pick when an either/or thing is wrong selectively: either it always is or it never is. Maybe I'm doing you a disservice, but complaining about it now while ignoring it when an investigation was being staged during last year's election campaign looks a bit...republican. If that's spin, then call me Pete Burns and buy me a dress.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 12:14:06 PM)
Who would begrudge the pedo $20 million a game Money well spent you communist

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 12:16:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Who would begrudge the pedo $20 million a game Money well spent you communist He's talking about the legal cost of looking to see if the kiddiefiddler has Putin's hand up his ares, not him sticking the taxpayer with an inflated bill every time a few secret service spooks have to rent golf cart or two to follow the cunt around while the taxpayer's paying him to play golf.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 12:26:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods You can't pick when an either/or thing is wrong selectively: either it always is or it never is. Maybe I'm doing you a disservice, but complaining about it now while ignoring it when an investigation was being staged during last year's election campaign looks a bit...republican. Actually, I think you're doing yourself a disservice by not realizing how bad your argument is. And for the record, I'm an Independent. quote: If that's spin, then call me Pete Burns and buy me a dress. ...and fuck up your face. BTW...the Marilyn Manson version is waaayyy better. JMO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEJ19E58uFw

WickedsDesire -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 12:32:17 PM)
I was led to believe trumps legal teams crushes the 13 years pelvic bones - or says follow the sweeties into bankruptcy so they cannot lawyer up and the Beast (its a car you knew that right?) it has 6 air holes in the boot and a wad of sound proofing So they say

WhoreMods -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 3:09:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny And for the record, I'm an Independent. So's every other republican who finds the orange pissmop in the white house embarrassing.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/5/2017 3:16:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny And for the record, I'm an Independent. So's every other republican who finds the orange pissmop in the white house embarrassing. I wouldn't know. I'm not acquainted with all the Republicans as you seem to be.

Musicmystery -> RE: Mueller every hire is under scrutiny (7/26/2017 7:05:45 AM)
Think Trump will fire him?

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875