Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords


Yes
  88% (8)
No
  11% (1)


Total Votes : 9
(last vote on : 7/12/2017 7:24:23 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


WickedsDesire -> Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 2:27:50 PM)

Did Donald Cock Womble Junior Jared Kushner Paul Manford collude with their Russian Overlords





WickedsDesire -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 2:51:56 PM)

You do all know dear readers the bots are in overdrive - so that when you google Trump Junior, Jew boy, Crooked Manifold, and collusion, they return "Hillary" who was she again anyway?

Think beyond the Pale as Tori Amos would say Doughnut Song

it means the Russians are still helping them treble guffaws




kdsub -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:22:44 PM)

If I were to enter a bank with the intent of robbing it... but the bank had no money... then would I be justified in saying I did not break a law... because they had no money? It is the same with Trump Jr.... he went to the meeting with the intent of " colluding " with the Russians to get damaging information on Clinton .. BY HIS OWN WORDS... If as he says he did not get any useful information then...does that mean he did not " collude ". The definition of collude is a secret understanding for a harmful purpose... How are Trump Jr's actions anything but collusion?

Butch





BoscoX -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:24:38 PM)


FR

Hillary did

Obama did

That's a known fact. No question

But I don't think anyone on President Trumps team did




heavyblinker -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:26:13 PM)

Are you repeating that to yourself while rocking back and forth and hugging your teddy bear?




BoscoX -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:30:05 PM)


FR

McCain did as well... [:D]




kdsub -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:31:56 PM)

The man flat out said he went to the meeting to get dirt from the Russians... this after denying any contact at all. It makes no difference if he got any useful information or not... if he is telling the truth. There is just no way around this confession.

Is your stance going to be.... will Obama and Clinton broke the law so it's OK for Trump to do it? You know as well as I if the FACTS that have been revealed over the last few months were Clinton rather than Trump there would already be impeachment proceedings.

Butch




heavyblinker -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:35:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


FR

McCain did as well... [:D]


"All news is fake news.
My delusions are true."-BoscoX




Politesub53 -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 3:52:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


FR

Hillary did

Obama did

That's a known fact. No question

But I don't think anyone on President Trumps team did



How`s Donald Putin working out for you now sock ? Seems junior is adept at lying as senior.




bounty44 -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 4:54:46 PM)

let me know when "no and normal people wish liberals would grow the hell up because we are sick to death of the Russian collusion fantasy" becomes an option, and maybe i'll come back and vote.




BoscoX -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 4:58:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

let me know when "no and normal people wish liberals would grow the hell up because we are sick to death of the Russian collusion fantasy" becomes an option, and maybe i'll come back and vote.


They have no clue, how ridiculous they are being

In their world everyone is as hysterical about their make-believe Russian nonsense as they are [:D]




Musicmystery -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 6:46:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

But I don't think.

That's a known fact. No question






BoscoX -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 6:53:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

But I don't think.

That's a known fact. No question





Changing the words in my post is almost as sharp as your felchgoblin friend and most of the rest of you alt left morons calling everyone you disagree with faggots




Musicmystery -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 6:55:26 PM)

There's nothing you've posted here that's any sharper.

Clearly the circus is in town.




BoscoX -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/11/2017 6:56:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

There's nothing you've posted here that's any sharper.

Clearly the circus is in town.


Yeah yeah yeah, everyone's a poopyhead

We've heard it all before




WickedsDesire -> RE: Did Donald Jr J Kushner P Manford collude with their Russian Overlords (7/12/2017 3:01:06 AM)

Here you go poopyDikhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

The Orange Filthmongerer is as clean as a whistle, plate of muck, a field cow shit, several fields of cow shit

Just watching sprog junior on FOX-shit and friends and I piddled the floor

Right so this was the meeting that didn't happen and wasnt declared in the appropriate form
But wait oh yes that meeting did happen but we met to discuss adoptions
Oh wait our first two versions are fuking lies because we are devious lying cunt nutters - we met our dear Comrades for the dirt on Hillary someone

Okay up to speed everyone? Picked your lie yet or which one you believe is the truth. The first two are them lying about the 3rd - Christ it took 2 lies before they got the story straight. But to be fair on them they always give you a bunch of lies to choose from (its actually 6-20 lies but I dont want to confuse people with them all and its more than one liar Paul & Jared you naughty dogs too)

Fuk it its just one big pile of lies - okay everyone up to speed now?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40560803

The president's eldest son probably revealed this correspondence because the New York Times was about to publish it, a fourth devastating journalistic wave that was poised to crash on the White House at any moment.

If that's the case Trump Jr's act, while committed in the name of being "totally transparent", was akin to shooting oneself in the head to avoid getting shot. He certainly didn't do it to save his own skin.
Here are four of the most remarkable passages of the email chain that will live in infamy - and what it all means.


"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr Trump" Fucking scorcher eh!

"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr Trump"
Trump Jr originally tweeted out the first three pages, leaving out page four, which has all the juiciest bits. It was like Beethoven's Ninth Symphony without Ode to Joy or the 1812 Overture without the cannons.

In the prior paragraph, he details exactly what he says is being offered - "official documents and information" about Democrat Hillary Clinton. Several lines later he floats the possibility of sending the incriminating material to Donald Trump the Elder, via his personal assistant, Rhona. (Rhona should probably get her own lawyer, by the way.) - there are no fuking lawyers left in America for her to lawyer up - christ! Jesus there are not even enough left for all their lawyers to lawyer up

"If it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer"
Setting aside the glaring lack of punctuation, this line in Trump Jr's response to Goldstone's email shows he knows exactly what he's getting himself into.

He's practically drooling at the possibility of being handed documents from the Russian government that incriminate the one person standing between his father and the White House.

What's more, those last few words seem to indicate that Trump Jr also is thinking about when such information could be revealed.

The meeting took place in early June. "Later in the summer", the general election campaign was in full swing.

It's when both parties held their national conventions. It is also, incidentally, when the most damaging emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee server - at the behest of the Russian government, according to the US intelligence community - went public via Wikileaks.

"Emin asked that I schedule a meeting with you and The Russian government attorney who is flying over from Moscow for this Thursday."

The lawyer in question - Natalia Veselnitskaya - has asserted that she is not connected to the Russian government, but Goldstone is presenting her to Trump Jr here as a "government attorney".

There's always the possibility that Goldstone is blowing smoke Trump Jr's way, trying to make it seem like he's setting up a super-secret meeting that will upend the presidential campaign when actually he's just saying whatever he thinks is necessary to get a meeting that his client, Russian pop star Emin Agalarov, has requested.

In the music business, I suppose, anything goes.
That may not exonerate Trump Jr, but it would relieve the Russian government of culpability, at least in this regard. No shit!



"To: Jared Kushner; Paul Manafort"

At the very top of the email chain are two names that should be of particular concern to the White House - Mr Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
Trump Jr had told the New York Times that he had asked the two men to attend the Trump Tower meeting but had not told them what was to be discussed.

This seems to undercut that, because both men probably had the full email chain, including the earlier correspondence discussing the promise of incriminating "documents and information" sitting in their in-boxes the day before they attended the meeting. Nah! Really? you dont say





Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875