White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Musicmystery -> White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 5:48:25 PM)

The White House just posted the emails of critics — without censoring sensitive personal information

The White House just responded to concerns it would release voters’ sensitive personal information by releasing a bunch of voters’ sensitive personal information.

Last month, the White House’s “election integrity” commission sent out requests to every state asking for all voters’ names, party IDs, addresses, and even the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, among other information. The White House then said this information would be made available to the public.

A lot of people did not like the idea, fearing that their personal information could be made public. So some sent emails to the White House, demanding that it rescind the request.

This week, the White House decided to make those emails from concerned citizens public through the commission's new website. But the administration made a big mistake: It didn’t censor any of the personal information — such as names, email addresses, actual addresses, and phone numbers — included in those emails.

In effect, the White House just released the sensitive personal information of a lot of concerned citizens giving feedback to their government. That’s made even worse by the fact that the White House did this when the thing citizens were complaining about was the possibility that their private information would be made public.

As of Friday afternoon, the emails are still uncensored and available on the White House’s website. They include all sorts of feedback, from concerns about privacy to outright insults of the Trump administration. One email just links to an image of the terrifying pornographic meme Goatse. (Do not Google this if you value your eyes.)

“DO NOT RELEASE ANY OF MY VOTER DATA, PERIOD,” said one person whose full name and email address were subsequently released in the collection of emails.

The White House website does now warn about the possibility of personal information going public: “Please note that the Commission may post such written comments publicly on our website, including names and contact information that are submitted.” But it’s not clear if the people who sent emails to the White House knew of this before the commission’s website went up this week.

The White House’s “election integrity” commission has been criticized more broadly because it’s widely believed to be an attempt to justify voter suppression. The group was set up after President Donald Trump, on Twitter and elsewhere, complained that he lost the popular vote due to millions of fraudulent votes. The best research shows that voter fraud is incredibly rare in the US — in 2016, for example, an investigation in North Carolina found that just one out of nearly 4.8 million total votes in the state was potentially a credible case of in-person voter fraud.

More: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/7/14/15973464/white-house-election-integrity-doxx

It's like the Key Stone Cops come to Washington.

[:D]




BoscoX -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 5:54:02 PM)


VOX,,, [sm=happy-smiley58.gif]

You are such a moron




Musicmystery -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 5:58:08 PM)

What a compelling counter argument.

But come on in, and join the laughter at your Boob King Moron and his Clown Troupe.

Would you like to read about it in the Atlantic instead?

Hell, every publication is running this story. Take your pic:

https://www.google.com/search?q=white+house+shares+sensivtive+personal+information&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

[image]https://i.imgur.com/KcMoiYr.png[/image]




bounty44 -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 6:22:29 PM)

i don't know the truth of the story, but am finding it fascinating that vox, or you for that matter, did not post actual screen shots of the offenses.

or did they?

that said, I notice you (conveniently?) left this part of the story out:

quote:

A spokesperson for Vice President Mike Pence, who’s helping head the commission, defended the move.

“These are public comments, similar to individuals appearing before commission to make comments and providing name before making comments,” Marc Lotter, press secretary to the vice president, said. “The Commission’s Federal Register notice asking for public comments and its website make clear that information ‘including names and contact information’ sent to this email address may be released.”


its like the "keystone cops" came to research methods, debate, or logic class.




Wayward5oul -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 6:31:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't know the truth of the story, but am finding it fascinating that vox, or you for that matter, did not post actual screen shots of the offenses.

or did they?

otherwise, its like the keystone cops came to research methods, debate, or logic class.

I think that was deliberate, so that they themselves would not be perceived as revealing personal info.

Had they included screenshots, then the complaint would be that they perpetuated the very act they were reporting on.




bounty44 -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 6:32:11 PM)

double post




bounty44 -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 6:37:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't know the truth of the story, but am finding it fascinating that vox, or you for that matter, did not post actual screen shots of the offenses.

or did they?

otherwise, its like the keystone cops came to research methods, debate, or logic class.

I think that was deliberate, so that they themselves would not be perceived as revealing personal info.

Had they included screenshots, then the complaint would be that they perpetuated the very act they were reporting on.


give my recent edit, I trust that names, addresses, numbers etc were indeed included.

but vox and whoever else could have posted them with that information redacted and the viewer would still know what was behind the redactions.

what I see in the story is the idiocy of people writing complaining about privacy issues, knowing that their contact information may be made public...and yes the irony of it all.






Aylee -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 6:43:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The White House just posted the emails of critics — without censoring sensitive personal information

The White House just responded to concerns it would release voters’ sensitive personal information by releasing a bunch of voters’ sensitive personal information.

Last month, the White House’s “election integrity” commission sent out requests to every state asking for all voters’ names, party IDs, addresses, and even the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, among other information. The White House then said this information would be made available to the public.

A lot of people did not like the idea, fearing that their personal information could be made public. So some sent emails to the White House, demanding that it rescind the request.

This week, the White House decided to make those emails from concerned citizens public through the commission's new website. But the administration made a big mistake: It didn’t censor any of the personal information — such as names, email addresses, actual addresses, and phone numbers — included in those emails.

In effect, the White House just released the sensitive personal information of a lot of concerned citizens giving feedback to their government. That’s made even worse by the fact that the White House did this when the thing citizens were complaining about was the possibility that their private information would be made public.

As of Friday afternoon, the emails are still uncensored and available on the White House’s website. They include all sorts of feedback, from concerns about privacy to outright insults of the Trump administration. One email just links to an image of the terrifying pornographic meme Goatse. (Do not Google this if you value your eyes.)

“DO NOT RELEASE ANY OF MY VOTER DATA, PERIOD,” said one person whose full name and email address were subsequently released in the collection of emails.

The White House website does now warn about the possibility of personal information going public: “Please note that the Commission may post such written comments publicly on our website, including names and contact information that are submitted.” But it’s not clear if the people who sent emails to the White House knew of this before the commission’s website went up this week.

The White House’s “election integrity” commission has been criticized more broadly because it’s widely believed to be an attempt to justify voter suppression. The group was set up after President Donald Trump, on Twitter and elsewhere, complained that he lost the popular vote due to millions of fraudulent votes. The best research shows that voter fraud is incredibly rare in the US — in 2016, for example, an investigation in North Carolina found that just one out of nearly 4.8 million total votes in the state was potentially a credible case of in-person voter fraud.

More: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/7/14/15973464/white-house-election-integrity-doxx

It's like the Key Stone Cops come to Washington.

[:D]


So, people did not read the warning notice and are now upset. What happened to Caveat lector?




BoscoX -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 7:35:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

So, people did not read the warning notice and are now upset. What happened to Caveat lector?


"Everybody keep hysterically panicking"




subrob1967 -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/14/2017 9:17:53 PM)

FR
Come on guys, you know MM just has to post the latest nothingburger for his life to be complete. He's trying to outdo CNN at producing fake news.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 12:08:35 AM)

quote:

i don't know the truth of the story

Well Pence confirmed it through a spokesman.




WickedsDesire -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 1:44:12 AM)

Well its not like that WhiteHouseMob can even fill out disclosures forms properly, even after several attempts.

Ah yes the voter fraud thingy headed up by Tuppence on instructions from the OrangeDevil where he stated, and on more than one occasion, he would have won the popular vote if it wasnt for nig nogs, coons, dead people, ghosts, Aliens, Elvis, didnt vote illegally for Hillary someone.

I must say he sounds like a Rational Man Cock Womble (heh look I am trying) And I for one absolutely respect any of his mob supporters who believe every word coming out of the lyng cunt nutters gob




mnottertail -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 4:04:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't know the truth of the story, but am finding it fascinating that vox, or you for that matter, did not post actual screen shots of the offenses.

or did they?

that said, I notice you (conveniently?) left this part of the story out:

quote:

A spokesperson for Vice President Mike Pence, who’s helping head the commission, defended the move.

“These are public comments, similar to individuals appearing before commission to make comments and providing name before making comments,” Marc Lotter, press secretary to the vice president, said. “The Commission’s Federal Register notice asking for public comments and its website make clear that information ‘including names and contact information’ sent to this email address may be released.”


its like the "keystone cops" came to research methods, debate, or logic class.


that is great, now we need to see the published names of all the dark money donors, their addresses, phone numbers identifying information, as well as all the other nutsucker retards who are so very serious about their privacy so they are no longer hiding, and all 4473s.

Oh, and all people who go to the whitehouse, and what was discussed in the meeting. Who attended.




WhoreMods -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 5:48:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't know the truth of the story, but am finding it fascinating that vox, or you for that matter, did not post actual screen shots of the offenses.

or did they?

that said, I notice you (conveniently?) left this part of the story out:

quote:

A spokesperson for Vice President Mike Pence, who’s helping head the commission, defended the move.

“These are public comments, similar to individuals appearing before commission to make comments and providing name before making comments,” Marc Lotter, press secretary to the vice president, said. “The Commission’s Federal Register notice asking for public comments and its website make clear that information ‘including names and contact information’ sent to this email address may be released.”


its like the "keystone cops" came to research methods, debate, or logic class.


that is great, now we need to see the published names of all the dark money donors, their addresses, phone numbers identifying information, as well as all the other nutsucker retards who are so very serious about their privacy so they are no longer hiding, and all 4473s.

Oh, and all people who go to the whitehouse, and what was discussed in the meeting. Who attended.

The really pathetic thing about that is that this list has been released for precisely the reasons that syrup boy was using to plead that el presidente shouldn't have to reveal his visitors' list to the white house. There's no reason to reveal people's contact information unless you want to see them harassed.




mnottertail -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 5:56:50 AM)

But a whitehouse promoting Goatse, c'mon, that is some real family values. Doxing is the new nutsuckerism, after all the times they have shit their pants over it.




BoscoX -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 5:58:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR
Come on guys, you know MM just has to post the latest nothingburger for his life to be complete. He's trying to outdo CNN at producing fake news.


I believe that he is genuinely 100% panicked and hysterical most of the time

He really believes that his VOX and his KOS talking points are meant to be taken literally.

He is a true believer, a kool-aid guzzler




WhoreMods -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 6:42:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR
Come on guys, you know MM just has to post the latest nothingburger for his life to be complete. He's trying to outdo CNN at producing fake news.


I believe that he is genuinely 100% panicked and hysterical most of the time

He really believes that his VOX and his KOS talking points are meant to be taken literally.

He is a true believer, a kool-aid guzzler

Again: how is the white house providing the identities and contact details of people they don't like more acceptable than revealing the identities of those who've visited the white house on official business that the taxpayer is funding?
Show your working out as to how the first is perfectly acceptable but the second is an incitement to harassment.




WickedsDesire -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 7:47:38 AM)

Who do you believe
Were the details released or not? (obviously not the pathologically lying cunt nutters tax-returns) ...well?

You are a true believer, a lavy pan guzzler, un-flushed.

what the hell is cool aid anyway

Kool aid flavoured water- fek the jokes lost on me.




Musicmystery -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 7:49:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't know the truth of the story, but am finding it fascinating that vox, or you for that matter, did not post actual screen shots of the offenses.

or did they?

that said, I notice you (conveniently?) left this part of the story out:

quote:

A spokesperson for Vice President Mike Pence, who’s helping head the commission, defended the move.

“These are public comments, similar to individuals appearing before commission to make comments and providing name before making comments,” Marc Lotter, press secretary to the vice president, said. “The Commission’s Federal Register notice asking for public comments and its website make clear that information ‘including names and contact information’ sent to this email address may be released.”


its like the "keystone cops" came to research methods, debate, or logic class.


You folks can be so absurdly ridiculous. Sure. Focus on VOX. That's the story.

Ignore (1) the link that shows what you asked for, and ignore (2) the dozens of other news outlets from the WP to the LA Times.

And ignore Pence acknowledging it.

Never happened.

Because VOX.

[:D][:D][:D]




Musicmystery -> RE: White House publishes sensitive information of critics of its sensitive information policy (7/15/2017 8:16:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR
Come on guys, you know MM just has to post the latest nothingburger for his life to be complete. He's trying to outdo CNN at producing fake news.

Naw, just laughing at the continually silly insistence that nothing is wrong, everything is moving smoothly according to plan, it's all part of a masterful strategy that only Trump fans can see.

~ Source




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875