BE VERY AFRAID (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> BE VERY AFRAID (7/18/2017 11:19:38 PM)


From Salon.com - a prediction

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.




WickedsDesire -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/18/2017 11:53:19 PM)

Do you need head pills?




stef -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 12:08:29 AM)

I think it's pretty clear that you both do. If one of you gets them, please share with the other.




WickedsDesire -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 12:16:04 AM)

Why should any of us believe your slobber noble gent?

I lobotomised myself a long time ago with a potato masher as I always wondered what it was like to function like you idiots.





WickedsDesire -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 12:29:31 AM)

Bohemian Rhapsody | Muppet Music Video | The Muppets

Christ 56 million views for that pile of pish

over to Flash




BoscoX -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:42:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

I think it's pretty clear that you both do. If one of you gets them, please share with the other.


I see you've met ManiacalMysery's special little dingleberry, hag

When no one else will bump his "TRUMP!!! RUSSIA!!! [sm=tongue_smiley34.gif]" threads, MM can always count on his insane little buddy to help keep them rolling along




Musicmystery -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:46:16 AM)

Now, instead of responding to my every post, you're responding even when I DON'T post.

Don't do that. Things are fucked up enough here without dragging me into shit I'm not part of.

Enjoy your hysteria about bad things not happening fast enough for you.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:51:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


From Salon.com - a prediction

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.



So, what exactly is your point?

A scientist in the late 80's made a prediction that didn't come true?




BoscoX -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:55:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


From Salon.com - a prediction

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.



So, what exactly is your point?

A scientist in the late 80's made a prediction that didn't come true?


The scientist who lectured Congress about "the Greenhouse effect"

No global warming prediction has come true yet, and we have passed the tipping point for most all of these hysterical predictions a while back





MasterJaguar01 -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:55:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Bohemian Rhapsody | Muppet Music Video | The Muppets

Christ 56 million views for that pile of pish

over to Flash



You absolute 100% fucking moron!


That's Jim Henson. Not Jim Hansen the climate Scientist.




BoscoX -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:56:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Now, instead of responding to my every post, you're responding even when I DON'T post.

Don't do that. Things are fucked up enough here without dragging me into shit I'm not part of.

Enjoy your hysteria about bad things not happening fast enough for you.


Go lecture someone who cares, moose. And try to quit being such a constant massive hypocrite





MasterJaguar01 -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 6:59:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


From Salon.com - a prediction

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.



So, what exactly is your point?

A scientist in the late 80's made a prediction that didn't come true?


The scientist who lectured Congress about "the Greenhouse effect"

No global warming prediction has come true yet, and we have passed the tipping point for most all of these hysterical predictions a while back





And BTW. Last year, restaurants in California were offering water by request only.




BoscoX -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 7:11:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

And BTW. Last year, restaurants in California were offering water by request only.


That prediction was for New York

California is an arid state with a massive growing population and a huge agriculture industry that has been bringing in its tenuous water supply via an aging and ill-maintained pipeline system for generations

And it experienced a drought, which droughts have always happened before. Even severe droughts. In fact, climate itself has always been in a constant state of change, but that's another thread




mnottertail -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 7:37:31 AM)

thank you felchgobbler einstein for the anecdote, as always you do not have any facts that would make it the synecdoche.




Musicmystery -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 7:52:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Now, instead of responding to my every post, you're responding even when I DON'T post.

Don't do that. Things are fucked up enough here without dragging me into shit I'm not part of.

Enjoy your hysteria about bad things not happening fast enough for you.


Go lecture someone who cares, moose. And try to quit being such a constant massive hypocrite



Good. If you don't care, then leave me out of it.

And no, I don't drag you into threads. You generally show up. Others may do that -- I don't really pay that much attention, not being the hall monitor.




BoscoX -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 9:18:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Now, instead of responding to my every post, you're responding even when I DON'T post.

Don't do that. Things are fucked up enough here without dragging me into shit I'm not part of.

Enjoy your hysteria about bad things not happening fast enough for you.


Go lecture someone who cares, moose. And try to quit being such a constant massive hypocrite



Good. If you don't care, then leave me out of it.

And no, I don't drag you into threads. You generally show up. Others may do that -- I don't really pay that much attention, not being the hall monitor.


You're just a troll with no standards so try to dry your eyes




BoscoX -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 9:26:02 AM)


FR

Twenty-Five Years Since The Ozone Hole Killed Us All

DDT, Global Cooling, China Syndrome, Ozone Hole, Global Warming, Climate Change – the left moves seamlessly from one world ending snake oil scam to another. In 1992 they blamed the ozone hole on President Bush, and said it was going to kill us all.

[image]https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Image1685_shadow-680x1024.png[/image]

12 Mar 1992, Page 8 – Detroit Free Press

NASA predicted an ozone hole over North America that winter, and said “it is far worse than we thought.”

[image]https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/PaintImage975_shadow-655x1024.png[/image]

20 Feb 1992, Page 39 – The Akron Beacon Journal

There never was a Northern Hemisphere Ozone Hole, and the one over Antarctica has not changed in size since the CFC ban was implemented.

[image]https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Image1689_shadow.png[/image]

https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/statistics/ytd_data.txt

The Democratic Party is the largest crime syndicate in history.





Edwird -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 10:12:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX



There never was a Northern Hemisphere Ozone Hole, and the one over Antarctica has not changed in size since the CFC ban was implemented.

[image]https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Image1689_shadow.png[/image]


There is no 'control' graph, which is to say that there is no graph to represent what the situation would be in absence of the CFC ban.

Boy, you are stupid beyond comprehension and entirely in contravention of evolution.

It's true that nature and evolution have their hiccups, but now some few of these hiccups have obtained a voting card and have latched onto internet forums in which to blast their oral flatulence.

Congratulations.




Musicmystery -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 10:39:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Now, instead of responding to my every post, you're responding even when I DON'T post.

Don't do that. Things are fucked up enough here without dragging me into shit I'm not part of.

Enjoy your hysteria about bad things not happening fast enough for you.


Go lecture someone who cares, moose. And try to quit being such a constant massive hypocrite



Good. If you don't care, then leave me out of it.

And no, I don't drag you into threads. You generally show up. Others may do that -- I don't really pay that much attention, not being the hall monitor.


You're just a troll with no standards so try to dry your eyes

And I'm so good that you respond before I even post!

I'm just that awesome.




Edwird -> RE: BE VERY AFRAID (7/19/2017 10:49:47 AM)

To make things clear; the notion of "saving the planet" is just stupid.

The planet went along just fine without oxygen for over a billion years, was a revolving mess of volcanoes at one time, was 66% under ice at another time, etc.

No, the issue here is survival (or not) of the prominent species at the moment.

We could all be wiped out and the planet will then just whistle merrily along, glad to be rid of the recent inconvenience.

Such self-extermination of own species as a long term plan, however, is part and parcel of the platform promulgated by people who, ridiculously enough, describe themselves as "conservative."



Can't blame that on nature, as it goes. Just on congenital fuckwits like bozo or gretta or nancy, etc.





Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875