quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL that was you right thru the hillary probed thread
its amusing to see you unable to do anything but post emojis

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so you can understand it muffin, nothing more.[:D]
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

funny---Hillary actually broke laws but you cant tell the difference can you?

and ive made ~4700 posts---how many of them are emojis? problems with logic have you?

maybe you can alert your pal mnottertroll to come and add some "felchgobbles" too?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

funny---Hillary actually broke laws but you cant tell the difference can you?

and ive made ~4700 posts---how many of them are emojis? problems with logic have you?

maybe you can alert your pal mnottertroll to come and add some "felchgobbles" too?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

They say the more stones you uncover, the more dirt you find ....

This appears to be the case as a series of ongoing investigations into Trump, his campaign and financial ties to Russia, son-in-law Jared Kushner, money laundering, Russian gangsters, sacked US prosecutors, investigations mysteriously blocked, dead (possibly murdered in prison) whistleblowers and more, are revealing potentially compromising links between this assortment of colourful characters.
Here's a starting point, the latest developments surrounding murky real estate deals between Kushner and some suspicious Russian characters (read: gangsters) and Russian funds allegedly looted from Russia's National Treasury:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/24/jared-kushner-new-york-russia-money-laundering

Here's the press release announcing the settlement of a money laundering probe with the accused agreeing to pay a US $5.9 million settlement without admitting guilt:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/acting-manhattan-us-attorney-announces-59-million-settlement-civil-money-laundering-and
And more details:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/341695-democrats-want-to-know-why-doj-dismissed-money-laundering-case

Some more details from April (and already a little out of date):
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/04/trump-financial-ties-russia-money-laundering-banks-oligarchs-manafort/

And further links revealing or analysing this tale - which sounds like the plot for the next James Bond movie - will be appreciated.

Of course all of the above needs to be read against the other numerous ongoing investigations into ties between Trump, and his various minions and organisations and Russia, most notably the Mueller investigation, which is said to be widening its probe to look at Trump's financial dealings with Russian interests over the years ..

.... it all stinks to the high heavens. This is not going to end well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL that was you right thru the hillary probed thread
its amusing to see you unable to do anything but post emojis

From another thread:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so you can understand it muffin, nothing more.[:D]
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

[:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL that was you right thru the hillary probed thread
its amusing to see you unable to do anything but post emojis

From another thread:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so you can understand it muffin, nothing more.[:D]
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

[:D]

it is typical of you to take it out of context
shrugs, little things n all that

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

funny---Hillary actually broke laws but you cant tell the difference can you?

and ive made ~4700 posts---how many of them are emojis? problems with logic have you?

maybe you can alert your pal mnottertroll to come and add some "felchgobbles" too?

There is no proof of hillary breaking any laws. Nowhere. There is nutsucker toiletlicking, and you are tonguing it up, but no evidence, and no proof. You are doing a splendid job of felchgobbling your putinjizz dogshit44, there is no need to add to it.

quote:

Here’s what Comey said:

"…there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information…"

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.

18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.

18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control.

Yes, Hillary broke the law.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

FR

Jul. 24, 2017 7:47 AM ET

Jared Kushner says he has 'nothing to hide' on Russia

WASHINGTON (AP) — (AP) — Senior White House adviser Jared Kushner is denying that President Donald Trump's campaign colluded with Russia, saying in a statement ahead of congressional interviews that he has "nothing to hide."
[snip]

"I did not collude, nor know of anyone else in the campaign who colluded, with any foreign government," Kushner said in the statement in which he also insists none of the contacts was improper. He also denies that Russians finance any of his business in the private sector.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

funny---Hillary actually broke laws but you cant tell the difference can you?

and ive made ~4700 posts---how many of them are emojis? problems with logic have you?

maybe you can alert your pal mnottertroll to come and add some "felchgobbles" too?

There is no proof of hillary breaking any laws. Nowhere. There is nutsucker toiletlicking, and you are tonguing it up, but no evidence, and no proof. You are doing a splendid job of felchgobbling your putinjizz dogshit44, there is no need to add to it.

you are like shooting fish in a barrel vile critter parts:

quote:

Here’s what Comey said:

"…there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information…"

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.

18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.

18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control.

Yes, Hillary broke the law.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/7177/fbi-yes-queen-hillary-broke-law-no-she-wont-be-ben-shapiro

if you want to hang your hat on the difference between "proof" and "evidence"---fair enough, but I suspect you weren't be smart enough to make that distinction. you lack the capability.

however, since you also used the word "evidence" and denied there was any, im going to have to go with what the fbi said over what you think. you know, because they actually did the investigation and youre a malevolent intellectual incompetent.

maybe some "felchgobbles" and "putinjizz" will make all that go away??

when all you loons have that depth of evidence on trump, bring it, otherwise it seems to be quite a lot of "unnamed sources" leaking to liberal journalists that "someone had a meeting" and trying to fill in dots to connect A to Z.

oh noooooooooo!

the heavy wishful thinking makes you all look even more like fools

[sm=runaway.gif][sm=runaway.gif][sm=runaway.gif][sm=runaway.gif]

and lucy, just for you---see if you can look beyond the funny emojis here to, my goodness, thoughts being conveyed with words too!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

FR

Trump supporters 6 months ago:
“There were no meetings with any Russians.”
Trump supporters 3 months ago:
“They just forgot to report the meetings with Russians.”
Trump supporters last week:
"There's no evidence of collusion with Russia!!"
Trump supporters 3 days ago:
"Who cares if the Trump campaign colluded with Russia?"
Trump supporters yesterday:
“It’s Obama’s fault for not stopping the meetings with Russians.”
Trump’s lawyer Jay Sekulow today:
“It’s the Secret Service’s fault for not stopping the meeting with Russians.”
Trump supporters tomorrow:
“Трамп собирается сделать Россию великой снова!”
(Stolen from a comment made on News and Guts)