MrRodgers -> RE: Trump’s business advisory councils disband (8/17/2017 9:55:02 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Liberals 'excuse' the Muslim for their terrorism ? Yes, Liberals ALWAYS says, don't blame Muslims for Islamic Terrorism, and Islamic Terrorism Has nothing to do with Muslims. Yet now ONE lone Nazi decided to drive a car into a crowd, EVERYONE is throwing stones at the ENTIRE group of Protestors and a whole Nazi organization. I mean All the Protestors were armed with guns right? IF they wanted to kill, they shouldn't use the damn car. They should have took their guns and spray bullets into the crowd. But they didn't! There didn't seem to be any shooting. Isn't that hypocrisy? On top of this. This was two parties who hate each other gathering in the same area, both came armed, ready for a fight. This wasn't innocent bystanders minding their own business and the Nazi attacked them unprovoked. This is totally different from all the terrorists attack from Muslims that involves cars driven into crowd. Like the one that happened in France? To even compare that to this, where counter protestors came armed to disrupt a protest is absolutely crazy. This is not terrorism. At the very most, this is an act of retaliation for the counter protestors using violence on the protestors. Violence breeds violence back. Like fucking seriously, I can't believe how you guys are all COMPLETELY do not care that Counter Protestors used violence on the Protestors at THEIR Protest. quote:
I guess in your country, say for example, road-rage would be a 'provoked murder' and it's just ok to run him down. I want to address this "road rage". Innocent driver just driving on the road, stop at a traffic light, minding his own business, singing in his car, then road rage driver got out of his car, and pummel this dude to death for annoying him with his singing = 100% road rage driver fault, and this is what islamic terrorists usually do with their car attacks In this Virginia scenario is equivalent to the driver throwing a rock into another driver's car, breaking his window and then the driver from that car with the broken window walk right out of the car, and drag the guy who damage his car out of the car, and pummel him to death. NOW, there is 50-50 fault here. Can you see the difference? quote:
You will have to prove to me that the counter protesters 'intentionally' went there to provoke any violence let alone murder. Read my post on eye witness account HERE. Last on this with you. Depends on who you wish to believe. As I read about this, it was the white supremacists who came as basically a large swat team. Gear, weapons and supplies and started the violence. Plus, you take it upon yourself to claim that bystanders were innocent, yet choose to declare...some not. Can't do that, you weren't there. But there is no equivalence between even loud and physical protesting including throwing rocks, with driving a car into a crowd. And no, there is no rage that justifies murder. The only 'provoked' murder there is...is self defense. This was not that. Oh as for these business leaders that left that council...they have it correct.
|
|
|
|