|
tweakabelle -> RE: Who said this? (8/18/2017 8:52:46 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
unbelievable---although I should have known better since this is your modus operandi over and over.
make a cogent argument yourself, not "www.theinternet.com" and certainly not "www.theinternetaccordingtoliberals.com"
are you that "fucking lazy or fucking hyperpartisan or just plain fucking intellectually incapable??"
I think I know the answer to that. i suspect all three.
you don't seem to understand how search engines work. i just did a search for "hillwilliam is a nimrod"---got 766,000 hits.
you also don't seem to understand "argument"---you made the claim, its incumbent on you to support it.
lastly, you cant discern the difference between someone who is challenging your thought as compared to someone who according to you, just supports republicans uncritically.
gotta love this!:
quote:
That is a problem that a lot of hyperpartisan people (of both sides) have.
They are too fucking STUPID to realize that if someone disagrees with them, that person is not necessarily of the opposite political bent.
recognize that?
one more time---make a cogent argument.
Yes, I do recognize that quote and you were one of the people I was referring to as hyperpartisan and stupid.
Mr Trump could assrape nuns in the rose garden and you would make excuses for him because he has an R after his name.
Ain't that the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Trumpanzees are so dumb that they haven't yet worked out what dear leader Thump meant when he said that he could shoot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue and his supporters would still support him.
FWIW it means that your dear leader Thump thinks his one eyed supporters, ie. people like Bounty Nnanji and Bosco, are brain washed idiots that will find a way of excusing anything he does, no matter how outrageous.
Who are we to disagree?
|
|
|
|
