RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people'

RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

bounty44 -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/2/2017 6:34:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery It's a serious lapse of judgement. if there was a "lapse of judgment" going on, it was that the guy didn't recognize we live in this hyper racially charged, politically correct time, where we have leftist speech overlords. Ah yes, here we are again. The problem wasn't that cops kept killing unarmed people, but that the media made such a fuss of it. The cop was sick of being demonized, not even for what other people did but for what people pretended they did. a grade school kid could understand that. makes you wonder why some liberals cant.

MercTech -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/3/2017 5:20:46 PM)
One of the things that really undermines public opinion on police is that fact that police have no legal obligation to protect the population. Police have a mission to arrest people after a law is broken and not to protect anyone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

BamaD -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/3/2017 5:41:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech One of the things that really undermines public opinion on police is that fact that police have javascript:void(powin('/post.asp?do=reply&q=1&messageID=5070792&toStyle=tm'))no legal obligation to protect the population. Police have a mission to arrest people after a law is broken and not to protect anyone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia Because if they had an obligation to protect people from the crime in the first place they would have to know when and where it would happen. I don't think people really want them to have the power to do that.

Nnanji -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/3/2017 7:13:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird If the police, as a group, are tired of being 'demonized,' then maybe they should quit whining and police their own better. What an idiot edweird. How many cops on that force are "bad" in your estimation? What a little twerp. You lump every department in one little group but pretend you are a member of the big tent lets everyone be themselves liberal. You tell me which watch Sargents isn't policing his people? You tell me anything other than your little stupid diatribes you use to sound oh so inclusive and anti hate.

Edwird -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/3/2017 8:50:23 PM)
Coherency of thought not being your strong point, I realize, but . . . Just what the heck are you trying to say, here?

Musicmystery -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 5:02:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech One of the things that really undermines public opinion on police is that fact that police have no legal obligation to protect the population. Police have a mission to arrest people after a law is broken and not to protect anyone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia That's there's not a "legal" mission doesn't mean they don't have a mission to protect.

bounty44 -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 5:50:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech One of the things that really undermines public opinion on police is that fact that police have no legal obligation to protect the population. Police have a mission to arrest people after a law is broken and not to protect anyone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia boy was that a disturbing read.

BoscoX -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 6:00:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech One of the things that really undermines public opinion on police is that fact that police have no legal obligation to protect the population. Police have a mission to arrest people after a law is broken and not to protect anyone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia Which is (obviously) a major reason why the people need arms for self defense.

Musicmystery -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 6:04:17 AM)
And classes in basic logic.

WhoreMods -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 6:06:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Which is (obviously) a major reason why the people need arms for self defense. Apart from the antifas, who shouldn't be armed or allowed any show of civil disobedience at all.

BoscoX -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 6:30:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery And classes in basic logic. Just like right here you constantly prove to us again and again that the very best "debate" you ever have is to attack other posters - all you are is a troll.

Musicmystery -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 6:37:53 AM)
Nope. Pointing out a point that got skipped over. Why do you see making points as an "attack"? Is truth and reality such a threat that you take the truth and reality personally? I'm under no legal mission to do more than required by contract to serve my customers. Yet I do it for every customer. So do a lot of businesses, because extraordinary service is part of our mission -- that it's not legally required isn't the point. Likewise, most (and probably all) police departments have as part of their mission to protect and serve. That it may not be a legal requirement is irrelevant, as it doesn't mean they don't strive to do it or that they don't consider it crucial to their duty. That's the "personal attack" and "Trolling" you're whining about. And yes, basic logic would have shown you that. Thanks for re-affirming my point.

BamaD -> RE: US police dashcam: 'We only kill black people' (9/4/2017 9:32:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Which is (obviously) a major reason why the people need arms for self defense. Apart from the antifas, who shouldn't be armed or allowed any show of civil disobedience at all. Nobody objects to civil disobedience. to bad they never do that.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875