|
Real0ne -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/13/2017 12:36:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
ah yes time honored tradition......we're gubmint, we're criminals, fuck you.
What is your alternative? Shall we all become sovereign citizens and deny the legitimacy of our governments? They are all criminals? Really? There are no honest and dedicated members in Congress and in the Administration? Beyond that, the implied immunity offered to the outgoing Administration is the grease that provides for a peaceful transfer of power. On Inauguration Day we do not see armored vehicles and tanks in the streets as you might see in some Latin American or African countries. You may not like the previous Administration and obviously you think everybody is a crook, but what you think of them politically is really not important. On Inauguration Day it is time to start anew peacefully and without rancor. That is a very big deal in the exchange of power in a democracy or in a Democratic Republic, whichever suits you.
A republican government is one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.
...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves..... [CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472.]
The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. [Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.]
The very meaning of 'sovereignty' is that the decree of the sovereign makes law. [American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 29 S.Ct. 511, 513, 213 U.S. 347, 53 L.Ed. 826, 19 Ann.Cas. 1047.]
Whats your point vince?
It must truly suck to discover the people everyone loves to call nutters are the ones who actually read the law, and the ZioJiz believers are always left high and dry?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8zUawrwyAg
Two things I wish to point out:
You are incapable of composing your own original expository sentences and so rely heavily on the copy/paste words of others.
Just wondering: when you and the six other sovereign citizen believers gather together for your midnight rituals and partake of the hard cider and banjo music, do you all doesy doe and around you go, as well? Or have you come up with your own original folk dances?
Wow, so indignant.
You really should make up your mind, one minute you are whining because I copy paste the next because I dont copy paste, which sounds like a perosnal problem to me.
You see vince when a person quotes court decisions copy paste is what a court not only expects but demands. Apparently you do not know that those [the maroon colored text in the previous quote] are court decisions, proving that sovereign citizens are real, that show how retarded and backwards those who condemn people who actually read understand the law.
Seems your point is to wallow in your own 'slave' ignorance, so be it.
|
|
|
|
