|
MercTech -> RE: Women "sleep with" minors, men "rape" them. (9/27/2017 4:14:07 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75
FR
But I honestly don't think any Feminist is actually fighting for teachers not to be prosecuted for having sex with their students, as that is unprofessional.
On my point of view, I remembered a girlfriend of mine, who ironically was a teacher herself, blamed a much older guy herself when she was very young, for sexual grooming. And she always condemned older men going for teenage girls. She claim at that age, she was just so innocent and didn't know better.
But I personally took responsibility for my own sex life since very young. At 13 yr old, I already make very conscious choices how far I wanted to go with my boyfriends. At that age too, I had a age limit for sexual interaction. No boys 2 years older than me. And I kept to it consciously. Infact at 13, most women are more mature than the men. No boys is gonna refuse sex, but seldom they will even be the one who initiate.
At 13, I was fully conscious of my choices and able to make wise and took full control of my own sex life. I never had sex education. Nobody taught me. It's just, at 13, technically, one is already pretty mature. If I had a male teacher who wanted my number, I simply said my parents do not allow me to give out numbers to the opposite sex. End of story.
That's why when I see 15 yr old boys sleep with 40 yr old teachers or whatever.
I can't see it as rape, as long as the teacher didn't drug them, kidnap them, knock them out, and seriously forcefully against their free will took them. Only in those circumstances would I consider it rape. It has to be like forced against them when they said no, they do not want this. I mean, both my brothers were already having sex at 15 yr old. Not with teachers, with girls their age. And they had loving relationships at that age already.
I think above 13, they are pretty conscious already of their actions.
Statutory rape should be 12 and below I feel.
That is the age where you can bribe them with candy to get sex.
As I was saying in my country, teenage boys are getting very vindictive when they get discipline by their teachers for whatever, and take revenge by going to police to accuse their educators of "statutory rape". Many of these incidents turn out to be totally false because the boys can't even clearly describe precisely what did the teacher did to them sexually. They had no idea how descriptive they needed to be in the report ha!
It just tells me that teenage boys are very conscious and know what they are doing.
Once, it was like that in many states. But, things changed around and the age of consent got raised in a huge push to outlaw "child brides".
Take a look at the details of the legal problems of Jerry Lee Lewis. Jerry Lee Lewis had a sexual relationship with a 13 year old and the girl's parents signed the permission for her to get married to Jerry Lee. While playing a concert in another country; he was arrested for statutory rape and deported. That was a real shit show for several months with all the arguments washing back and forth. One thing that got it really debatable was that what he did was legal in Tennessee but he was arrested in London. I remember my mother talking about a warrant put out for him in New York but no one served it until after he had flown on to Tennessee. I was young. All I knew was that I liked his music and I was suddenly forbidden to play any of it where the neighbors could hear. The rest is piecing memories together with historical record.
Personally, I've met people 25 I'd say are too immature for an intimate relationship and 15 year old kids that are really ready to put a ring on it. A legal "age of consent" rather states a statistical average. Back in the 19th century; If you were old enough to start making a family you had bloody well be mature enough to decide on sex. Today when functional childhood is extended to the mid 20s age of consent has been raised higher and years past the onset of puberty. With the poorer diet prevalent, a 19th century girl, on average, hit puberty around 16 and was married a year or so later. Laws from then reflected that with marriage allowed, with parental consent, at 13 and without parental consent at 16. Today in the U.S., we consider people able to marry without permission at age 18 but can't buy a bottle of champagne to celebrate the wedding until 21. If it sounds backwards, I rather agree.
I was one of those kids chanting "Old enough for war, old enough to drink" over the issue. By the way, we can thank Joan Claybrook, the "Murdercycles should have mandatory airbags" National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, for blackmailing the various states into raising the legal drinking age again during the Carter administration.
re. 26th amendment passed in 1971 made 18 legal age in the U.S. Most State forbade liquor sales to persons below "legal age". In 1975, states were forced to make laws specifying 21 to be legal age to purchase or consume alcohol or have federal matching funds for highways not paid by the NHTSA (wasn't even a Presidential order).
|
|
|
|
