|
Nnanji -> RE: Trump's Response to Devastation in Puerto Rico: Wait, What?! (10/6/2017 9:51:09 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:
Oh, and, as probably the only professional on this board that has both been part of planning for disastersand participated in fixing them during and after they occurred, I'll generally ignore your little bitch statements for the ignorance they are. Actually, your organizational thoughts on the subject are totally wrapped up in your myopic small world view with projection based on your beliefs which have no basis in reality. But, I didn't mention that until you got all bitchy and whiny.
I'll ignore the rest of your responses since it's obvious you haven't a clue about the topic except for biased projections. Have a nice day.
Oh dear, she throws a tantrum and stamps her feet does she? Here is a post Katrina report on FEMA. . .
"The readiness of FEMA's national emergency response teams was inadequate and reduced the effectiveness of the federal response."
"Long-standing weaknesses and the magnitude of the disaster overwhelmed FEMA's ability to provide emergency shelter and temporary housing."
"FEMA logistics and contracting systems did not support a targeted, massive, and sustained provision of commodities."
"Before Katrina, FEMA suffered from a lack of sufficiently trained procurement professionals."
Where were the emergency shelter and temporary housing after the governor and mayor called for help in Puerto Rico? The President had declared a disaster on day one of the storm.
Why did it take two weeks to provide the massive and sustained provision of commodities after the governor and mayor called for help in Puerto Rico?
Source for post Katrina report on FEMA
And talk about little bitch statements, dementia and memory loss saves you from recalling your absurd attempt to connect my comments to communism. What a jerk. Still fighting the cold war. [8|]
This is not about you or me, Princess. This is about FEMA's response to the storm in PR. Let's not take to personal slander. "Commie" WTF?
And, I'm rolling my eyes as I ask this because you obviously know nothing about which you are speaking except a deep blinkered view that everything government is good and white people are bad, does anything you've post have anything to do with what I explained to you?
Tell me if wearing your professorial cap gives your boner an extra tingle. Does it make you feel superior in some fetische way to try to lecture me? I am still awaiting an answer as to why you suddenly, desperately felt it necessary to call me a Commie. Was that a carefully considered evaluation of my thesis? No, doubtful. More like a childish epithet hurled out over your spilled milk. I never ever anywhere said government is always good and white people are always bad;I only recounted history, which I would have expected you to know. In this particular case, in fact, I have taken the position that government fucked up, and I made no observation at all about race. The former is your misconception and the latter is some weird manifestation arising perhaps from the confusion you feel that I have given you no cause to attack my feminine failures. Kinda leaves you feeling down in the dumps when you lack a woman to castigate, don't it, poor sod? Pathetic you are when you stray from the subject matter at hand.
Please see...I believe...post 136, your item 8 where you mention in quotations the US as a colonial landlord which is your commie sneaking out on you. Having read a great deal of Chairman Mao's personal diaries he wrote during the time he was struggling to form a communist government, I noted just how similar you sound.
You don't just quote history. You cherry pick which history you become histrionic about. I usually ignore it because I can respect you being a commie if that is what you really believe. But, if you're going to deny it now, I have to diminish my respect.
|
|
|
|
