RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms


Yes
  6% (2)
No
  56% (17)
I would need to see the exact specifics before I can decide.
  36% (11)


Total Votes : 30
(last vote on : 10/18/2024 11:01:51 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


AtUrCervix -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/2/2017 12:36:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

So Peon commented on something going on in the U.S. ? Big fucking deal. Whatever happens in America at this time, affects the rest of the world and as such, I would sat that gives him every right to comment.
GL............If you think that Nazi Germany's government was efficient, it's small wonder you are Gung-Ho for trump, maybe you should learn to read something past ' The Loveable Spot' .........it was probably the most inefficient, top-heavy and corrupt government unhung, with people like you put into positions they didn't have the expertise or qualifications for. Anyway, How dare YOU, an American, comment on the government of another country. like Nazi Germany ?
I've been many times to your country; how many times have you been to mine or Peon's ? Or any other country in this big wide world ?
As he might say, " Wanker" and if he didn't, I do.


What a completely derelict ignorant statement.

Making the comparison to Trump is just ridiculous.

Whether you think Hitler was a maniacal evil monster, or think he was a sweetheart of a guy....has zero bearing on the guys comment: That Nazi Germany's government was extremely efficient.

There's no relationship between what we all know about Hitler....and the posters comments.

THIS is how conversations spiral down in this forum, because ignorant people respond to them.

***********

Someone said the word "Nazi".

Nazi's are evil, therefore, the poster is evil.

The Poster said something.

The poster is evil because they used a word.

Everything the poster says is evil.

The poster said "Ice cream is nice to eat".

Ice cream is evil.

How ignorant.






Musicmystery -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/2/2017 5:30:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyDemura

Why not just a 100% net worth tax on all net worth over $100,000? That would actually resolve everything...even if the decimal point was moved, but why again should anyone be allowed to have more than the majority of people combined? Net worth tax is the way to go...take it all from the rich people, and maybe then the poor whites might agree to it???

Well, because no one could retire, no one could own land, no one could own a farm, no one could own a business, in fact, at $100,000, no one could own a house.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/2/2017 7:38:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874
So Peon commented on something going on in the U.S. ? Big fucking deal. Whatever happens in America at this time, affects the rest of the world and as such, I would sat that gives him every right to comment.
GL............If you think that Nazi Germany's government was efficient, it's small wonder you are Gung-Ho for trump, maybe you should learn to read something past ' The Loveable Spot' .........it was probably the most inefficient, top-heavy and corrupt government unhung, with people like you put into positions they didn't have the expertise or qualifications for. Anyway, How dare YOU, an American, comment on the government of another country. like Nazi Germany ?
I've been many times to your country; how many times have you been to mine or Peon's ? Or any other country in this big wide world ?
As he might say, " Wanker" and if he didn't, I do.


Many on here went batshit (and are still on about it) about the Russians meddling with the US election. Many non-US Americans argue with US Americans over politics, using a persuasive style. In essence, those non-US Americans are also attempting to meddle with the US Election (arguing over the merits of the candidates), and with internal politics of the USA.

Apparently, it's okay when they meddle, but not when others meddle. [:D]




WhoreMods -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/2/2017 7:50:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874
So Peon commented on something going on in the U.S. ? Big fucking deal. Whatever happens in America at this time, affects the rest of the world and as such, I would sat that gives him every right to comment.
GL............If you think that Nazi Germany's government was efficient, it's small wonder you are Gung-Ho for trump, maybe you should learn to read something past ' The Loveable Spot' .........it was probably the most inefficient, top-heavy and corrupt government unhung, with people like you put into positions they didn't have the expertise or qualifications for. Anyway, How dare YOU, an American, comment on the government of another country. like Nazi Germany ?
I've been many times to your country; how many times have you been to mine or Peon's ? Or any other country in this big wide world ?
As he might say, " Wanker" and if he didn't, I do.


Many on here went batshit (and are still on about it) about the Russians meddling with the US election. Many non-US Americans argue with US Americans over politics, using a persuasive style. In essence, those non-US Americans are also attempting to meddle with the US Election (arguing over the merits of the candidates), and with internal politics of the USA.

Apparently, it's okay when they meddle, but not when others meddle. [:D]



I think that analogy is a bit strained, if we're honest: it isn't like any of the non-US citizens on here attempted to influence your last election by hacking into government servers, is it?




DesideriScuri -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/2/2017 5:27:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874
So Peon commented on something going on in the U.S. ? Big fucking deal. Whatever happens in America at this time, affects the rest of the world and as such, I would sat that gives him every right to comment.
GL............If you think that Nazi Germany's government was efficient, it's small wonder you are Gung-Ho for trump, maybe you should learn to read something past ' The Loveable Spot' .........it was probably the most inefficient, top-heavy and corrupt government unhung, with people like you put into positions they didn't have the expertise or qualifications for. Anyway, How dare YOU, an American, comment on the government of another country. like Nazi Germany ?
I've been many times to your country; how many times have you been to mine or Peon's ? Or any other country in this big wide world ?
As he might say, " Wanker" and if he didn't, I do.

Many on here went batshit (and are still on about it) about the Russians meddling with the US election. Many non-US Americans argue with US Americans over politics, using a persuasive style. In essence, those non-US Americans are also attempting to meddle with the US Election (arguing over the merits of the candidates), and with internal politics of the USA.
Apparently, it's okay when they meddle, but not when others meddle. [:D]

I think that analogy is a bit strained, if we're honest: it isn't like any of the non-US citizens on here attempted to influence your last election by hacking into government servers, is it?


If we're honest, the analogy is a shit-ton strained (which was the point and is why I used the emoji right after it).

Just because someone didn't go to the same extremes as another (or others) doesn't mean that someone wasn't meddling. Since purchasing ads on Facebook and hiring social network specialists in an attempt to influence the election wasn't as bad as hacking into the DNC servers, does that mean it wasn't meddling in the election?





WhoreMods -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/3/2017 5:10:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874
So Peon commented on something going on in the U.S. ? Big fucking deal. Whatever happens in America at this time, affects the rest of the world and as such, I would sat that gives him every right to comment.
GL............If you think that Nazi Germany's government was efficient, it's small wonder you are Gung-Ho for trump, maybe you should learn to read something past ' The Loveable Spot' .........it was probably the most inefficient, top-heavy and corrupt government unhung, with people like you put into positions they didn't have the expertise or qualifications for. Anyway, How dare YOU, an American, comment on the government of another country. like Nazi Germany ?
I've been many times to your country; how many times have you been to mine or Peon's ? Or any other country in this big wide world ?
As he might say, " Wanker" and if he didn't, I do.

Many on here went batshit (and are still on about it) about the Russians meddling with the US election. Many non-US Americans argue with US Americans over politics, using a persuasive style. In essence, those non-US Americans are also attempting to meddle with the US Election (arguing over the merits of the candidates), and with internal politics of the USA.
Apparently, it's okay when they meddle, but not when others meddle. [:D]

I think that analogy is a bit strained, if we're honest: it isn't like any of the non-US citizens on here attempted to influence your last election by hacking into government servers, is it?


If we're honest, the analogy is a shit-ton strained (which was the point and is why I used the emoji right after it).

Just because someone didn't go to the same extremes as another (or others) doesn't mean that someone wasn't meddling. Since purchasing ads on Facebook and hiring social network specialists in an attempt to influence the election wasn't as bad as hacking into the DNC servers, does that mean it wasn't meddling in the election?



The comparison is spurious because one case is legal (being a form of political advertising) and the other isn't.
(That's a much better "...but So and So!" than most can manage on here, mind.)




LadyPact -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 1:47:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
And it wont stop any of us from posting, no matter what you think or say.


This would be a relevant comment *if* we were talking about an OP that wasn't sanctioned by moderation.





Lucylastic -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 1:57:06 AM)

His comments to ME were,
"As a commenter on internal US affairs you are irrelevant. "

The OP is squirming thru moderation. Im not legitimizing him.

It doesnt make the topic irrelevant, or any non americans opinions irrelevant.




LadyPact -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 2:03:25 AM)

That was the secondary comment and/or meaning. It could also be argued that the same comment was directed to the OP. (Sixth version of sock puppet in regard to the OP, you get my drift.) It's a matter of interpretation.





Lucylastic -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 2:10:00 AM)

more than sixth.




LadyPact -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 2:31:19 AM)

LOL.

Yes, there is that. [:D]




DesideriScuri -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 7:35:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
The comparison is spurious because one case is legal (being a form of political advertising) and the other isn't.
(That's a much better "...but So and So!" than most can manage on here, mind.)


That's the funny part. The Right went batshit over the trove of damning emails that were illegally gotten. The Left went batshit over the illegal action (hacking), but haven't even attempted to deflect the subject of the email that the Right drooled over.

If Trump and/or his campaign worked with Russian actors to hack the DNC, that would likely be determined to be illegal.
If Trump and/or his campaign contacted the Russians over information damaging to Hillary the Russians alledgedly had, I'm not sure that's really illegal. Maybe possession of stolen property? I don't think any damning material was given to Trump/campaign staffers, so that's less likely to have been illegal.
If Trump and/or his campaign coordinated with the Russians over their ad campaign, then that would very likely run afoul of Federal campaign laws.

How much of this was Trump in on? If he wasn't in on it, then he's less likely to have any real repercussions. His campaign staffers, however, would have repercussions.




WhoreMods -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 8:26:03 AM)

All true, sadly. For myself, I find it very hard to take the ranting and raving about the emails at all seriously as the trumptooners, neocons and other alt.rightists who were complaining about Clinton doing that did not appear to give a flying fuck when it was not just a secretary of state but also a president and his veep illegally and unconstitutionally running government business from private email servers. Given that the main difference between Clinton and Powell is the letter after their name, it's impossible not to view that as anything other than a double standard involving the rule of law only applying to the other party.

As for the other, I'd suspect it's impossible for el presidente not to be in on it, but as it isn't something that makes him look good, he'll not accept any responsibility for it at all, and any staffers it can actually be proven about will be required to take one for the team.




itsSIRtou -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 9:24:36 AM)

to the OP....

every "tax cut" since reagan has only accomplished really one thing..... make the already wealthy more so.

the economy doesn't improve because the money at the top doesn't go anywhere, the wealthy just invest in themselves, bank it, or buy foreign goods like BMW's and there's no incentive whatsoever to do otherwise. Ether way the wealthy don't use the tax cut to improve the American GDP.

the money at the middle and lower classes gets spent to pay down what they already owe, so there really no way for them to pump up the economy with new spending.

even if "john q. middleclass" goes out and buys a new car with his $1000.00 tax cut, he's just plunged himself into $20K+ more debt. Again the economy doesn't go anywhere.

when rump first rolled out this "tax cut plan" during the campaign, it had the scrutiny of every economist on the planet..... they all pointed out his plan exponentially blew up the national debt.

so far Ive seen nothing that sway's that conclusion away from the current "plan".

If in no place there a stipulation that any amount of tax cut the wealthy or big corporations gets has to be spent on job creation, the purchase of "made in America" goods (the parent company cannot be outside the USA) or invest in USA companies, (again, the parent company cannot be outside the USA)

Then America will be right back where it was in 2008, only worse, and the table is already being set for it.






DesideriScuri -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 9:30:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
All true, sadly. For myself, I find it very hard to take the ranting and raving about the emails at all seriously as the trumptooners, neocons and other alt.rightists who were complaining about Clinton doing that did not appear to give a flying fuck when it was not just a secretary of state but also a president and his veep illegally and unconstitutionally running government business from private email servers. Given that the main difference between Clinton and Powell is the letter after their name, it's impossible not to view that as anything other than a double standard involving the rule of law only applying to the other party.


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/colin-powell-blasts-hillary-clintons-team-pin-private/story?id=41570285
    quote:

    Powell's and Clinton's use of personal email — and the systems that they set up — differed. The Inspector General's report cites an explanation from Powell's autobiography, in which he writes that he "installed a computer on a private line" that was used for his personal email account, which he used to send messages to "principal assistants, individual ambassadors and foreign minister colleagues."

    In an interview on ABC News' "This Week" in March 2015, Powell told George Stephanopoulos that while he didn't store any of his emails, "in fact, a lot of the emails that came out of my personal account went into the State Department system. They were addressed to State Department employees and the State.gov domain. But I don't know if the servers the State Department captured those or not."

    The biggest difference between Powell's and Clinton's usage was that she had a completely separate server to house and store her emails, whereas Powell used only a separate email account.

    Emphasis mine


quote:

As for the other, I'd suspect it's impossible for el presidente not to be in on it, but as it isn't something that makes him look good, he'll not accept any responsibility for it at all, and any staffers it can actually be proven about will be required to take one for the team.


I highly disagree that it's impossible for Trump to not have been in on it. None of the primary actors in this drama strike me as upright and completely open and honest. I can see them doing shit without Trump's knowledge.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 9:45:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou
to the OP....
every "tax cut" since reagan has only accomplished really one thing..... make the already wealthy more so.
the economy doesn't improve because the money at the top doesn't go anywhere, the wealthy just invest in themselves, bank it, or buy foreign goods like BMW's and there's no incentive whatsoever to do otherwise. Ether way the wealthy don't use the tax cut to improve the American GDP.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_US_Manufacturing_Company
    quote:

    The BMW US Manufacturing Company, also known as BMW Spartanburg, is a vehicle assembly facility for BMW Group and is located in Spartanburg, South Carolina;[3] it is BMW's only assembly plant in the United States. The plant is currently BMW's sole global production site for X3, X4, X5, and X6 crossover SUVs whose biggest market is the U.S., while other BMW models sold in the U.S. market are imported.

    ...

    BMW announced in 1992 that it would build a 1,150-acre (4.7 km2) manufacturing facility in Spartanburg County, South Carolina, United States to strengthen its international production system. The plant opened in 1994.[4]

    The $2.2 billion plant, which employs 8,800, is one of the company’s global five-plant production network.

    The automaker announced in 2014 an additional $1 billion investment in the facility that will make Spartanburg, South Carolina BMW's largest US factory, with an annual capacity of 450,000 units[5] when including the X7.[6] There were 364,000 vehicles produced in 2014, of which 70% were exported to 140 countries.[4] The plant is second only to the plant in Dingolfing, Germany in BMW vehicle production.


BMW's second largest production plan is in the US. How much you want to bet they hire American workers? How much you want to bet lots of money is spent in the US because that plant is there? Or, is it simply about a nameplate? Don't forget that Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge is own by Fiat, a non-American car company. So, according to your illogic, anyone purchasing one of those cars isn't improving the American GDP, either. Oh, and it was owned by Daimler prior to that. And plenty of vehicles are made in Canadia [sic], which, isn't in the good ol' US of A, either. The Dodge salesman tried to hook my Dad into buying a Dodge Charger instead of a Toyota (which my Dad was only using as leverage; he was reliving his youth in buying the Charger) by using the "foreign car" strategy. Not surprisingly enough, my Mom's Toyota and the Toyota he was using as leverage were actually made in Ohio, while the Charger was made in Canada, making the Charger, the "foreign" car, not the Toyota's.

So much for not improving the American GDP.

quote:

the money at the middle and lower classes gets spent to pay down what they already owe, so there really no way for them to pump up the economy with new spending.
even if "john q. middleclass" goes out and buys a new car with his $1000.00 tax cut, he's just plunged himself into $20K+ more debt. Again the economy doesn't go anywhere.
when rump first rolled out this "tax cut plan" during the campaign, it had the scrutiny of every economist on the planet..... they all pointed out his plan exponentially blew up the national debt.
so far Ive seen nothing that sway's that conclusion away from the current "plan".
If in no place there a stipulation that any amount of tax cut the wealthy or big corporations gets has to be spent on job creation, the purchase of "made in America" goods (the parent company cannot be outside the USA) or invest in USA companies, (again, the parent company cannot be outside the USA)
Then America will be right back where it was in 2008, only worse, and the table is already being set for it.


All you're doing is bitching about how much one group is getting in cuts in comparison to how much another group is getting in cuts. Fucking waa. If a family is getting a tax cut, they'll have more of their own money to spend as they so choose. How is that NOT great?!? And, as far as people using tax cuts to spend down the debt they already owe goes, perhaps they shouldn't have overspent (and, I do admit, grudgingly, that i am fighting that very demon in my own life, so, I get it).





WhoreMods -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 10:56:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I highly disagree that it's impossible for Trump to not have been in on it. None of the primary actors in this drama strike me as upright and completely open and honest. I can see them doing shit without Trump's knowledge.


We'll have to agree to disagree on that, then: I can't see the control freaky little shit letting anybody pull stuff like that without him knowing about it.




itsSIRtou -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 12:59:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou
to the OP....
every "tax cut" since reagan has only accomplished really one thing..... make the already wealthy more so.
the economy doesn't improve because the money at the top doesn't go anywhere, the wealthy just invest in themselves, bank it, or buy foreign goods like BMW's and there's no incentive whatsoever to do otherwise. Ether way the wealthy don't use the tax cut to improve the American GDP.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_US_Manufacturing_Company
    quote:

    The BMW US Manufacturing Company, also known as BMW Spartanburg, is a vehicle assembly facility for BMW Group and is located in Spartanburg, South Carolina;[3] it is BMW's only assembly plant in the United States. The plant is currently BMW's sole global production site for X3, X4, X5, and X6 crossover SUVs whose biggest market is the U.S., while other BMW models sold in the U.S. market are imported.

    ...

    BMW announced in 1992 that it would build a 1,150-acre (4.7 km2) manufacturing facility in Spartanburg County, South Carolina, United States to strengthen its international production system. The plant opened in 1994.[4]

    The $2.2 billion plant, which employs 8,800, is one of the company’s global five-plant production network.

    The automaker announced in 2014 an additional $1 billion investment in the facility that will make Spartanburg, South Carolina BMW's largest US factory, with an annual capacity of 450,000 units[5] when including the X7.[6] There were 364,000 vehicles produced in 2014, of which 70% were exported to 140 countries.[4] The plant is second only to the plant in Dingolfing, Germany in BMW vehicle production.


BMW's second largest production plan is in the US. How much you want to bet they hire American workers? How much you want to bet lots of money is spent in the US because that plant is there? Or, is it simply about a nameplate? Don't forget that Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge is own by Fiat, a non-American car company. So, according to your illogic, anyone purchasing one of those cars isn't improving the American GDP, either. Oh, and it was owned by Daimler prior to that. And plenty of vehicles are made in Canadia [sic], which, isn't in the good ol' US of A, either. The Dodge salesman tried to hook my Dad into buying a Dodge Charger instead of a Toyota (which my Dad was only using as leverage; he was reliving his youth in buying the Charger) by using the "foreign car" strategy. Not surprisingly enough, my Mom's Toyota and the Toyota he was using as leverage were actually made in Ohio, while the Charger was made in Canada, making the Charger, the "foreign" car, not the Toyota's.

So much for not improving the American GDP.

quote:

the money at the middle and lower classes gets spent to pay down what they already owe, so there really no way for them to pump up the economy with new spending.
even if "john q. middleclass" goes out and buys a new car with his $1000.00 tax cut, he's just plunged himself into $20K+ more debt. Again the economy doesn't go anywhere.
when rump first rolled out this "tax cut plan" during the campaign, it had the scrutiny of every economist on the planet..... they all pointed out his plan exponentially blew up the national debt.
so far Ive seen nothing that sway's that conclusion away from the current "plan".
If in no place there a stipulation that any amount of tax cut the wealthy or big corporations gets has to be spent on job creation, the purchase of "made in America" goods (the parent company cannot be outside the USA) or invest in USA companies, (again, the parent company cannot be outside the USA)
Then America will be right back where it was in 2008, only worse, and the table is already being set for it.


All you're doing is bitching about how much one group is getting in cuts in comparison to how much another group is getting in cuts. Fucking waa. If a family is getting a tax cut, they'll have more of their own money to spend as they so choose. How is that NOT great?!? And, as far as people using tax cuts to spend down the debt they already owe goes, perhaps they shouldn't have overspent (and, I do admit, grudgingly, that i am fighting that very demon in my own life, so, I get it).




ds,.... the ultimate profit for that vehicle no matter where its built, goes to the parent companies bottom line, wherever that companies headquartered.

For example, Medtronic, a long time Minnesota company, in a strategic move, "inverted" & transferred its home offices to Ireland, where it now pays a third of the taxes it paid in the US.

Guess what? That means its profits, AND GDP is now also claimed by Ireland. and it STILL gets to keep the $40M in US federal contracts it has acquired. Not to mention allsorts of other perks of a US company,

Like the majority of the benefits of US citizenship. OH sure, Medtronic, hired more people, and those people pay taxes, buy things, etc.,. BUT.... that doesn't make up for the $3 BILLION in taxes EVERY YEAR that doesn't go into US coffers. and THAT $3B in taxes is what we all have to make up for.

NOW,.....let Me make this clear...... I am all for a TRUE MIDDLE CLASS TAX CUT. - families and individuals. and poor people.

NOT one thin dime of a tax cut to the wealthy, or the majority of big corporations, big business without strings attached,

to Me, the wealthy and big corporations don't need another bundle of money to not create jobs with. which job creation is one of the bullshit selling points for the tax cuts in the first place.

u like the wealthy so much? keep giving them ur wallet and see what u get back from them. keep giving the wealthy tax cuts with no strings attached and that's all ur doing.

So far the only thing they given u or anybody so far from tax cuts is more space between u and them for total net worth....how stupid is that???

IF the reason for giving a tax cut is for job creation, then its not too damn much to demand & make them ACTUALLY create jobs with it....

Now, u and I have had some good debates,...but, How does that NOT make sense to u??

to be simplistic.... If I ask u for money for a particular reason and u give it to Me, (TWICE!!) but I instead I go buy or do something else with it altogether, why should u keep giving Me more money OR....not demand I spend it for the reason I told u?




http://www.startribune.com/medtronic-now-based-in-ireland-still-reaps-u-s-benefits/392895471/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/10/03/the-trump-tax-cuts-would-be-the-most-insane-giveaway-to-the-rich-ever/?utm_term=.0c0ef115b521

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tax-fiscal/rich-would-benefit-most-from-trump-tax-cut-plan-policy-group-idUSKCN1C42C8



PS.....its nicknamed "VOODOO economics" for a darn good reason...






MrRodgers -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/4/2017 11:46:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyDemura

Why not just a 100% net worth tax on all net worth over $100,000? That would actually resolve everything...even if the decimal point was moved, but why again should anyone be allowed to have more than the majority of people combined? Net worth tax is the way to go...take it all from the rich people, and maybe then the poor whites might agree to it???

Well, because no one could retire, no one could own land, no one could own a farm, no one could own a business, in fact, at $100,000, no one could own a house.

Well at only $100,000 you would be quite correct, it being a rather ridiculously low amount. However, what's been actually described as a wealth tax and starting only the million$, has been considered by many western nations even in the US.

Those considerations just never get far. All western countries should first concentrate on leveling the tax field with all sources of income...just being income. No more special 'carve outs' for capital.

There is no conceivable reason whatsoever for $500,000 salary being taxed at almost 40% while the same income from capital gains or carried interest, whatever that is, is taxed at 20%.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Do you Support President Trump's Big Tax Cuts and Reforms (10/5/2017 7:23:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I highly disagree that it's impossible for Trump to not have been in on it. None of the primary actors in this drama strike me as upright and completely open and honest. I can see them doing shit without Trump's knowledge.

We'll have to agree to disagree on that, then: I can't see the control freaky little shit letting anybody pull stuff like that without him knowing about it.


I'm not saying he didn't know about it. I'm not saying he wasn't the architect of it all.

I am saying I don't think it's impossible he didn't know. That is, it's possible he didn't know.

I also wouldn't doubt his son(s) wouldn't go out of their way to surprise daddy in an attempt to gain props, either.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.109375