RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Nnanji -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 9:43:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LTE

I am so glad she commented. I'm sure the fact that it came after he was fired and now powerless is simply a coincidence. ex Senator Hillary Clinton (DEM NY) is known for prompt action and highly regarded comments. Take the comment on Benghazi being caused by a video and her prompt and uplifting speech at the Dem Election Headquarters before all the "I'm with Her" supporters who stood in line for a victory party and were handed a "you don't have to go home but you can't stay here" announcement before the first dance even started. So I for one was waiting breathlessly for her view on the situation.
BTW, what did she do as Senator? Some fools think it was just a stepping stone to the White House. I know that can't be right, New Yorkers are too smart for that, right?


Oh no, she did sponsor a bill to name a post office.




tweakabelle -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 12:32:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LTE


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
move along? you are the one who wants to smear hillary as a culprit in this, and she isnt the one being accused of sexual harassment or rape,

I am holding Hillary up to her claim that she champions women. NOT because she is a woman, but HER CLAIM and Michelle Obama Claim, that, Hillary champions women! So I gotta call her out when she kept silence and took like forever to denounce something so obviously a female abuser.

But you were trying to say that Trump is as bad as Weinstein.

All I can say, he paid none of those allegations off. And no women have came forward and claim Trump grab their pussy. As you like to say that his locker room brag is proof of his guilt that he grabs women pussy without their permission.


quote:

Trump is just defending his honour? no he has threatened to sue them, and the NY times,by making more disparaging comments.

Usually suing somebody means defending your honour, challenging the accuser whether what they are saying is true. Paying off someone means you are guilty and silencing the accuser. See the difference?




Impressive.

Not impressive at all.

Usually threatening to sue and not following through with an actual law suit is one strategy that is used to silence critical voices and to muddy/bury information that is detrimental to a person's image, even though the accusations/information might well be accurate and true. Threaten to sue and unless they have long pockets and are up for the stresses and challenges of a protracted law suit, the accusers tend to back off ...

Threatening to sue in no way establishes innocence. If anything, threatening to sue and failing to follow through with the law suit, as Trump has done, tends to give more weight to the accusations that have been made against him.




Danemora -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 2:05:46 AM)

~FRing it~

Is H.R.C. even relevant at this point? Election was decided on November 2, 2016. Its now October 11, 2017. After nearly a year, HRC shit still is shittier than what Trump as our fucking POTUS is shittily doing currently??? Jesus Fucking Christ, talk about living in the fucking past!!!




Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 4:25:46 AM)

And that is exactly why she did the OP.
No more no less, distraction from the orange oooze.





heavyblinker -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 4:42:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LTE


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Winning an election isn't about smart policy, it's about getting votes from people, most of them hopelessly uninformed.


HELLO Barack Obama


I'm not going to argue that a lot of people didn't choose Obama for the wrong reasons.
He was still a good president, though.

Trump is already easily the least competent, most absurdly unfit person ever to hold that post.
When we get to the point where his policies actually begin to have a noticeable effect (beyond the already present fear, despair, division, hatred and betrayal of western values), you will understand this.



As it turns out, with the advent of cable new channels the electorate was well informed, better than ever.

President Obama will be remembered for his expansion of hand outs, suggesting we can "keep our doctors" under the health care plan his attack dog wanted to pass "so we can read it" as well as the failed "shovel ready" projects and suggesting to Putin that he must wait for Obama's second term before President Obama does whatever Putin wanted him to do. Anything else, oh yes, paying Iran to stop their nuclear program and the failed "red line in the sand" he drew to pretend he was forcefully dealing with Syria's killing of civilians in rebel held territory.


Misinformed doesn't mean you are well-informed.
The advent of cable news means people get to live in their echo chambers and hear what they like hearing without being challenged.

People who voted for Trump voted because they liked what he was saying, not because they understood that it couldn't be done without destroying the entire global economy, because it was the right thing to do, or because they realized he was full of shit, which he is.

Seriously, how the fuck could people convince themselves that a vulgar, racist, sexist boor of a reality TV host/real estate salesman with ties to the mob and blatant connections to money laundering for the Russian mafia/oligarchs would know how to lead the country better than a skilled politician with decades of experience?

If it was about being qualified and suited to the job as opposed to winning a popularity contest where the judges are a bunch of morons, it wouldn't have even been close.
The Russians have at least convinced me that this voting thing really isn't the way it ought to be done in the future, so mission accomplished on that front.

I honestly don't know how anyone who voted for Trump, or even didn't vote for Hillary... can't be feeling deep pangs of remorse right now.
Every single day he embarrasses the country in new ways.
Americans are more of a laughing stock than they have ever been before, and I am saying this as someone who has travelled a lot and heard what people in other countries think of Americans.

And if you aren't embarrassed, that probably means you are also a moral and intellectual infant who is happy that someone just like you is finally getting some power.
Or you're just not paying attention or something.




heavyblinker -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 4:50:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

we know your issue with barely legal women too
And Bosco like scaring little girls.



I have never written anywhere that I like scaring little girls, lying scumbag hag [:D]


You're right.
Nancy is the one who likes scaring little girls... he got off on watching some old guy scaring a little girl and told everyone here about it.

He also concocts disturbing fantasies about children and their mothers when describing people he hates.

Bosco is an obnoxious dumbfuck, not a creep like Nancy.




Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 5:02:52 AM)

nah it was boscox not nanji
im trying to find the original link , but im sick today so it will have to wait...but it was mentioned here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5033196
so its earlier than that.
so you own nanji an apology..in my humble opinion.

Funny but the link is about Trump and his wanting to stop the media(imprisoning journalists) especially since he was tweeting up a storm yesterday and mentioned it live, that he wants NBCs license to be stripped.








BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:06:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

nah it was boscox not nanji
im trying to find the original link , but im sick today so it will have to wait...but it was mentioned here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5033196
so its earlier than that.
so you own nanji an apology..in my humble opinion.

Funny but the link is about Trump and his wanting to stop the media(imprisoning journalists) especially since he was tweeting up a storm yesterday and mentioned it live, that he wants NBCs license to be stripped.







That's a link to more of your idiotic trolling, hag. If you had a brain you would be embarrassed




Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:09:14 AM)

if you have a brain everyone will be surprised.




BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:12:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

if you have a brain everyone will be surprised.


The idiot hag is so stoopid she has to parrot insults.... Can't come up with her own [:D]

Where is the link, idiot?




Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:14:32 AM)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8sFfsIiU2s




BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:16:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8sFfsIiU2s


Just a stupid lying troll hag then. Spew stupid lies that you can't possibly back up when called on them

As if there were any question




Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:26:20 AM)

I said" the link will have to wait," can you not comprehend plain english.
Edited to add that BTW I didnt state that you had ever written that you" like scaring little girls... "
there is a difference to what I actually said and what you think I said.
comprehension is your friend.






itsSIRtou -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:04:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

im not necessarily convinced of the "re-elect" part of your statement, but wholeheartedly agree with the first part.


I (for once) agree with the "re-elect" part.... once the recession kicks in like the other tax cuts from regan & bush only faster, since they will be "the biggest in history", he'll get kicked to the curb just as fast (I hope.)

Unless, he starts a war somewhere, it kept bush in, so rump will use that strategy, to stay in.....




Nnanji -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:17:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

we know your issue with barely legal women too
And Bosco like scaring little girls.



I have never written anywhere that I like scaring little girls, lying scumbag hag [:D]


You're right.
Nancy is the one who likes scaring little girls... he got off on watching some old guy scaring a little girl and told everyone here about it.

He also concocts disturbing fantasies about children and their mothers when describing people he hates.

Bosco is an obnoxious dumbfuck, not a creep like Nancy.

Still LMAO at your butt hurt Google boy.




heavyblinker -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:24:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

nah it was boscox not nanji
im trying to find the original link , but im sick today so it will have to wait...but it was mentioned here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5033196
so its earlier than that.
so you own nanji an apology..in my humble opinion.

Funny but the link is about Trump and his wanting to stop the media(imprisoning journalists) especially since he was tweeting up a storm yesterday and mentioned it live, that he wants NBCs license to be stripped.


Wow you're right.

Okay-- sorry, Nancy... that creepy story wasn't yours!
You only do the creepy 'mumsey' shit.




Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:38:48 AM)

kudos.




BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:51:32 AM)


...and so the leftist howler trolls have fucked up yet one more thread with their mindless stupidity.

The only kind of "debate" they know

(Situation normal at Collarchat)




BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:57:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I said" the link will have to wait," can you not comprehend plain english.
Edited to add that BTW I didnt state that you had ever written that you" like scaring little girls... "
there is a difference to what I actually said and what you think I said.
comprehension is your friend.





You fancy yourself a mind-reader hag then




tweakabelle -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 8:03:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I said" the link will have to wait," can you not comprehend plain english.
Edited to add that BTW I didnt state that you had ever written that you" like scaring little girls... "
there is a difference to what I actually said and what you think I said.
comprehension is your friend.





You fancy yourself a mind-reader hag then

No one will ever accuse our poor Bosco of having a mind, let alone being a mind reader.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125