RE: Self Defense? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


swtnsparkling -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 6:45:20 AM)

Being in an abusive relationship and not leaving it, then shooting the person and saying you feared for your life is hogwash to me. There is alot of help out there now a days many options other than killing.




Level -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 6:46:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: swtnsparkling

Being in an abusive relationship and not leaving it, then shooting the person and saying you feared for your life is hogwash to me. There is alot of help out there now a days many options other than killing.


sweet, she did leave it, several times, but kept going back because she "wanted to make my marriage work".
 
Should have stayed gone.




kittensmailbox -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 6:49:00 AM)

and yet we let a woman who killed her 5 children sit in a mental hospital...




swtnsparkling -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 6:52:23 AM)

Ah, thanks for the info.
Still think some thing is fishy though




MrDiscipline44 -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:03:42 AM)

Nope, I say let the bitch rot in jail. I don't support her husband for abusing her, but ends does not justify means. She left multipul times but kept coming back? Then it's her own dumb-ass fault for being there.




SusanofO -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:13:00 AM)

Haven't either of you heard of "battered woman syndrome"? It is a real phenomenon, and also quite prevalent in abusive, co-dependent relationships of this sort.

I am living in the state where this happened, and I think this woman got a raw deal. I think perhaps some jail time is in order, but not the sentence she received. Her husband was a complete violent and drunken Pig. Not just to her, but to her family and their children as well - and for years on end. Saying she should have left, while it could be true (obviously things would perhaps have worked out better for her if she had done that), strikes me as not very compassionate. Where is your heart? 

Where is your understanding of what it must be like to live with someone for years who is so abusive, yet feel obligated to stay for who knows what reasons? (co-dependency, family pressure to saty married, etc.)  Where is your consideration not just of all of the facts, but also the possible reasons and motive for what she did - and not "just the facts"? If we all tried cases on "just the facts", I think quite a few of us might be in prison for things we did, too - don't you? Burying someone in the backyard sounds horrible (and I am not excusing it, at all) - but so do a lot of other things sound horrible. When one hears all the kinds of things he did to her - it paints quite a different picture.

- Susan




theRose4U -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:15:42 AM)

quote:

It's a similar vein to that woman who accidentally hit a guy with her car, proceded to drive home and hide her car, with the still living man halfway through her windshield, for three days while he died. It was an accident, she didn't need to hide anything. The crime was not in the act, but in concealing that act.


Are you positive that this is real? Sounds just like a CSI re-run that I saw last night. From season 2 I believe?




Level -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:16:05 AM)

She did leave, but went back because she wanted her marriage to work, her words, not mine.
 
I do have some compassion for her, but she got out and should have stayed out.




Level -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:17:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: theRose4U

quote:

It's a similar vein to that woman who accidentally hit a guy with her car, proceded to drive home and hide her car, with the still living man halfway through her windshield, for three days while he died. It was an accident, she didn't need to hide anything. The crime was not in the act, but in concealing that act.


Are you positive that this is real? Sounds just like a CSI re-run that I saw last night. From season 2 I believe?


Oh, it's real allright.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,47361,00.html




SusanofO -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:19:03 AM)

Maybe - but she didn't have hardly any support to do that. Nobody - I mean nobody - not family, not firends, not neighbirs, was helping this woman - and she has asked some people to help her get out of her situation (family, and a friends). Maybe she should have called a battered woman's shelter, but she didn't (for whateever reason). I think it's obvious to me she just "snapped" one day.

- Susan




Level -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:21:27 AM)

She certainly may have snapped, I understand that. And it no one she asked to help, did, then I hope they can live with themselves.




Dauric -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:25:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

quote:

ORIGINAL: theRose4U

quote:

It's a similar vein to that woman who accidentally hit a guy with her car, proceded to drive home and hide her car, with the still living man halfway through her windshield, for three days while he died. It was an accident, she didn't need to hide anything. The crime was not in the act, but in concealing that act.


Are you positive that this is real? Sounds just like a CSI re-run that I saw last night. From season 2 I believe?


Oh, it's real allright.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,47361,00.html


File in "Reality is stranger than fiction". Then dig it up for research writing a CSI episode.




SusanofO -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:26:46 AM)

I agree, Level. This kind of thing happens in small Nebraska towns all the time (and elsewhere I am sure it does, too). Last week, a toddler in a small town was abusively killed by her own grandmother. People in that town had seen "little signs" of the abuse for months (so some said) - but nobody ever did squat about it, like call police or a shelter. Why? Why? All it takes is an anonymous phone call...

- Susan




Dauric -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:32:34 AM)

We're taught at an early age no-one likes tattletales.

On top of that it's frequntly harder to get involved, even from the perspective of anonymous phone calls, -and- get positive results, than it is to just stay out of it.

$0.02

Dauric.




Level -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:33:31 AM)

CPS in our county is often a joke; the next county over, they do good work. It's a crap shoot trying to get help, sometimes. A woman came into our court yesterday with a black eye and a huge swath of skin torn from her forehead. Did the police help? No. We issued a peace bond, maybe that'll help her, maybe it won't. Part of the price being human, I suppose, dealing with insanity.




Alumbrado -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:38:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

Prior abuse does not mean she was in imminent danger at that particular moment, and that's when self defense applies.  If she had just waited for him to turn around, she would likely have been acquitted.

~stef


In some rare cases, a pattern of growing abuse leading to a 'last chance' scenario might also demonstrate a reasonable belief that the only way to stay alive was to shoot their abuse in the back before he followed though on his promise to kill her. 
In those rare cases, 'imminent' doesn't have to mean 'in the next fraction of a second'.
That is part of the battered spouse syndrome defense...
the perception that the abuser will certainly follow though on their threats, and that no other remedy is available.

It also requires a lot of other support of the perception on the part of the person being abused that there was no other way available...for example if the police had been out 30 times and the abuse kept getting worse, it might seem more reasonable to think that they wouldn't be able to help the last time.

In any case, it appears that the defense didn't successfully make that case here.




theRose4U -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:43:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrDiscipline44

Nope, I say let the bitch rot in jail. I don't support her husband for abusing her, but ends does not justify means. She left multipul times but kept coming back? Then it's her own dumb-ass fault for being there.


I had to give up being a victim advocate because of this exact opinion. Woman and her wee one came in once with a story of horror. She was put into the underground and re located while undergoing counciling, and of coarse the whole legal fun that goes with restraining orders, divorce petitions and the like. She called him to a safe house to pick her up the day after the restraining order was served.
She shows up in the ER again a few days later and he was arrested for violation of the restraining order.  This time she is kept closer to the perimeter of the program and is not put into any of the safer locations because of her calling hubby to a safe house before. She takes off one night because hubby was harassing her at work and the child had started crying for daddy. Weeks go by and no one knows what happened. Months go by and I get a call in the middle of the night to come to the hospital when I was supposed to be "off" so I knew that something was very very wrong. Only when I arrived was I told who it was. Her wee one was dead and she was about as close as someone that still technically has face could be. Because I had helped this person before I was once again called on to help and when she awoke with the tales of he didn't mean it, I forgot to wash a dish and had been back talking it's not his fault...I walked and never looked back.
It's one thing to be an idiot that volunteers yourself for situations, it's completely another to repeatedly make bad choices that directly affect others. I would get the legal defense of diminished capacity for killing this tool box, but I have a hard time with the idea of locking a rotting body in a room, marrying someone else and thinking that no one would question. Last time I checked to re-marry you have to explain what happened to the previous spouse..  




MrDiscipline44 -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:54:15 AM)

So violence begets violence? Someone scorns you so you scope them? Nope Susan, if it were a man, his ass would be locked away and not heard from again or received a death penalty. She lost my compassion when she blew her husband away from behind. That's meditated. She waited till he was turned around. And then she left the body there to rot. Didn't tell anyone, never brought it up again. Na-ah, bullshit.

And as for that "she had no support" crap, more bullshit. There are shelters, safehouses, underground movements for this sort of thing. Your going to tell me that they can get women out from the middle of nowhere (Colorado City, Utah) to save them from a lifestyle (polygamy) but couldn't get this woman out from somewhere in Nebraska? Crap. If women want to be so equal then they need to stop doing the stupid shit and own up to thier actions.




smilezz -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 7:56:55 AM)

There are to many variables here.  Why did she not approach that when she was in court?   what about her attorney?  there are just to many "If's" at this point.

Being as i just got out of a community meeting last night where self-defense was being talked about and also about the what if's in taking another's life.  This is what we were told by the Authorities:   IF you are in fear of your life...........you can take another's life. (this comment was made for home invasions by the way)  Even if you do end up taking another person's life....you WILL have to justify it in a court of law.  Just because someone may break into your home does not mean you are in fear of your life........................yet.
I know this is off track from the original post...........but i had to ask the Officer last night about taking a life and this is what was said to me.  He also said the most important aspect is:  IF you are in FEAR of your life.  BIG key words.

I don't wish anyone to ever have to go through abuse, in any way.  I guess we'll just have to wait this one out and see if it makes the news again.

~smilezz~




theRose4U -> RE: Self Defense? (7/29/2006 8:14:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Haven't either of you heard of "battered woman syndrome"? It is a real phenomenon, and also quite prevalent in abusive, co-dependent relationships of this sort.

I am living in the state where this happened, and I think this woman got a raw deal. I think perhaps some jail time is in order, but not the sentence she received. Her husband was a complete violent and drunken Pig. Not just to her, but to her family and their children as well - and for years on end. Saying she should have left, while it could be true (obviously things would perhaps have worked out better for her if she had done that), strikes me as not very compassionate. Where is your heart? 

Where is your understanding of what it must be like to live with someone for years who is so abusive, yet feel obligated to stay for who knows what reasons? (co-dependency, family pressure to saty married, etc.)  Where is your consideration not just of all of the facts, but also the possible reasons and motive for what she did - and not "just the facts"? If we all tried cases on "just the facts", I think quite a few of us might be in prison for things we did, too - don't you? Burying someone in the backyard sounds horrible (and I am not excusing it, at all) - but so do a lot of other things sound horrible. When one hears all the kinds of things he did to her - it paints quite a different picture.

- Susan


This reads completely as someone that's never been there. How fortunate for you that you can READ about things like post-traumatic disorders and battered wife syndrome to base opinions on. These stories of boo hoo he hit me and I stayed, he raped me and I stayed, he killed my child with his bare hands and I can't wait till he gets out of jail...whoops humm can you say needs a reality check??
Working with people in these situations and being a wee one FROM one of these situations I can assure you that battered wife syndrome is a cool name that someone came up for to explain the manipulation, mental illness and explainations for situations that defy all logic in situations like this. That one little word that so many in BDSM love to hang our hats on called CONSENT comes into play here. OK, he's a bad bad man, ok he's a drunk & kicks the dog and was mean to you...so why did you continue to consent by being there? Usually you get a deer in the headlights response. But he was mean to me and you should feel bad. Umm no, why did you continue to be there? But he was mean to me you should forgive the illegal thing I did. Umm no, if you knew this was a bad situation why did you continue to consent? Boo hoo hoo you're saying I deserved this. Umm no, I'm asking why you let things get this bad. But boo hoo he was mean to me and so are you because you aren't letting my manipulation of the facts sway your opinion and let me get away with not having personal responsibility for my actions.
Catching my drift? Logic & common sense don't apply well in these situations not because of the situations themselves (the evidence and facts are what they are) but because of the emotions and the mental instability of those involved. The whole arguement that he was shot in the back of the head because of imminant danger doesn't fit. The manipulation of boo hoo he was mean to me is supposed to excuse her actions and in reality it doesn't. Part of life as we know it includes people that we respect and those that we view as garbage. Unfortunately for laws to properly function, all of these people good, bad, and better off dead all have the same right to live. DAMNED CONSENT & RULES, if only we could just off those people that piss us off in life it would be a much better place, too bad that on any given day all of us could be a target of that logic. Cut me off in traffic huh ...boom you're outta here. Be a bitch to me will ya, boom you're outta here. Have an opinion that others don't like damn guess I'm uhggg gag ick ah uhhhhhhhhhh.[sm=goodnight.gif]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02