Lucylastic
Posts: 40310
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
Now that the dossier is being corroborated piece-by-piece, I figure you will start hoping that is NOT what he was trying to mark!
first ive heard of that.
should be an easy post then to make with each point of the dossier and its corresponding corroboration?
worthy of its own thread even.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/10/25/schiff_on_trump_dossier_sometimes_opposition_research_is_true.html
SCHIFF: We've known for some time, at least it has been publicly reported, that the dossier --the hiring of Christopher Steele-- was originally on behalf of one of the Republican candidates, and later on behalf of the Democratic candidate. This was the first confirmation of half of that. But it doesn't really shed light where we need light shed -- and that is: How much of what Mr. Steele found can be corroborated, how much of it is accurate.
We've been working hard to answer that question, and that is really what the American people need to know. Indeed some of the dossier has been corroborated.
What I find most interesting is that Christopher Steele, no matter who was paying for his services, may have discovered before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were going to interfere in our election on behalf of Donald Trump.
We have a lot of work to do on behalf of some of the claims in the dossier, but it doesn't add much value to learn who paid for it necessarily and I view this as the effort to discredit [primary author Christopher Steele] which really doesn't advance the investigation...
Here the Republicans are less interested in what did Russia do and how did they do it and how do we protect ourselves? But rather, let's shift the focus on to any kind of government misbehavior, and maybe if we can suggest that the whole investigation goes back to this dossier and this dossier was opposition research, maybe we can discredit the whole investigation and maybe we can get the country to ignore what Russia, in fact, did.
more at the link
As the investigation isnt over, there wont be a lot of information on what they are....sworry
Oh and here is a link to specific analyses done by wapo recently.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/10/25/what-the-trump-dossier-says-and-what-it-doesnt/?utm_term=.30b074b98252
_____________________________
(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \
\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \
(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \
Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
|
Liberals Plan to scream at the sky to mark anniversary ... - 
Profile
RE: Liberals Plan to scream at the sky to mark annivers... - 
" hysteria, is based on a planted fake dossier that Hillary paid for with campaign cash, and that James Comey gave her a wink and a nod over the whole sordid false conspiracy 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread