Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

The Uranium One controversy, explained by the people who publicized the story


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Uranium One controversy, explained by the people who publicized the story Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Uranium One controversy, explained by the people wh... - 10/30/2017 11:07:03 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline 		https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/opinion/paul-manafort-indictment-trump.html

quote:

it was The Times that in 2015 helped uncover and publicize the uranium arrangement, but it has been flagrantly taken out of context by Fox News and its ilk. For starters, there seems to be a suspicion on the right that American uranium is going to Russia, while in fact there’s no export license—so the uranium stays in America. More important, this was a non-controversial deal that an interagency committee approved, apparently unanimously, at a level far below Hillary Clinton as secretary of state. Every bit of evidence says that Clinton never even weighed in on it. So the notion that this is somehow a serious scandal parallel to Moscow’s work to overturn an American presidential election is just comical.


So there you have it.

< Message edited by heavyblinker -- 10/30/2017 11:10:20 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 11:11:58 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline 		The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

Besides, hasn't been the right wingers in America that find it just ok that billion$ in repub donations are totally undisclosed and even contributers to repub and right wing PACS and non-profits are never disclosed and there is NO law requiring their disclosure. [They] the right don't want that law.

LOOK the left, the Clintons are corrupt YES !!

BUT as I've told you, mere amateurs compared the the right (repubs) The dems could learn a lot more than Reagan taught them about corruption


< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 10/30/2017 11:26:27 AM >

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 11:13:49 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
Oooops!

quote:

Clinton Foundation Donations and Bill Clinton Speaking Fee

Clinton’s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank.

On April 23, 2015, the New York Times wrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.


So ... who broke the story? By your inference, that would make Schweizer the "authority", no?



Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 11:24:11 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline 		If there was some cosmic law that said only the person who first discovered the story could ever be 'the' authority, then yeah, I guess.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 11:27:09 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
IIRC hers was one of 9 signatories on that deal.


She was controlling their minds.
But really, she wouldn't have to use her mind control powers here-- everyone knows how easy it is to get government officials to give away US Uranium reserves so that Hillary Clinton can become rich.

They just really want her to have a lot of money.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 11:45:45 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


Oooops!

quote:

Clinton Foundation Donations and Bill Clinton Speaking Fee

Clinton’s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank.

On April 23, 2015, the New York Times wrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.


So ... who broke the story? By your inference, that would make Schweizer the "authority", no?



Michael

But Michael, if this was a private contribution to an HRC PAC or non-profit, disclosure is not required.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 11:50:38 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
IIRC hers was one of 9 signatories on that deal.


She was controlling their minds.
But really, she wouldn't have to use her mind control powers here-- everyone knows how easy it is to get government officials to give away US Uranium reserves so that Hillary Clinton can become rich.

They just really want her to have a lot of money.

History must show this so future historians after they declare [us] insane for driving 3000 lbs objects virtually at each other and at speed, will also get a laugh about how this one deal and even a handful of deals like this, ranks up there with historical right wing avarice.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 3:06:46 PM   
LORDOFTHERINGS19


Posts: 7
Joined: 10/6/2009
Status: offline 		Have you ever watched FOX-shit and friends wankers? It scares even me. It is unlikely I scare easily.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The Uranium One controversy, explained by the peopl... - 10/30/2017 5:37:42 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline 		Get back on your meds, headcase.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to LORDOFTHERINGS19)
Profile   Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Uranium One controversy, explained by the people who publicized the story Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078