RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened"

RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

playfultom62 -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 6:35:25 AM)
So if Clinton bailed out the DNC to the tune of $25 billion or whatever, she can't call some shots? I know that if DS had money in something, he would want a major say, hell, even if he aint got a dime of money in a place, he is trying to dictate policy. He just isnt any good at it or ever successful.

heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 6:47:54 AM)
Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened. What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now. Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it. A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it. The reason it looks like preferential treatment is because there were only two candidates, and one of them was an idiot who never belonged to the party and put his 'principles' ahead of everything else. Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it.

BoscoX -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 6:49:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened. What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now. Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it. A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it. Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it. She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example)

heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 6:54:37 AM)
FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it? The money didn't go to her personally, it went to the DNC, her primary campaign, the presidential campaign, as well as the campaigns of other Democrats. If Bernie had won the primary, the money would have gone to his presidential bid. Any other candidate could have participated in the same program, but only Hillary did. Brazile herself is only speculating on whether or not it compromised the 'integrity' of the DNC.

BoscoX -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 7:24:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it? Same deflection you howlers howl every time something is posted that you cannot deny [:D]

heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 7:34:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it? Same deflection you howlers howl every time something is posted that you cannot deny [:D] You post this while ignoring the rest of what I said, and I am deflecting. Okay.

SeekingMnD -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 7:45:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened. What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now. Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it. A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it. Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it. She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example) Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger! Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister.

BoscoX -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 7:48:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it? Same deflection you howlers howl every time something is posted that you cannot deny [:D] You post this while ignoring the rest of what I said, and I am deflecting. Okay. Why address your empty-headed howling It means nothing. You're (as always) throwing everything against the wall desperately hoping that something sticks Nothing is sticking, your pussyhat queen hacked the election purely for personal profit

heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 8:08:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Why address your empty-headed howling It means nothing. You're (as always) throwing everything against the wall desperately hoping that something sticks Nothing is sticking, your pussyhat queen hacked the election purely for personal profit Bosco do you actually read your own comments (especially comments like this one) and think 'wow, I really posted something with substance'? Do you feel proud when you say things like this? Like you're really proving a solid point? I am honestly curious.

BoscoX -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 10:05:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SeekingMnD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened. What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now. Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it. A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it. Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it. She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example) Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger! Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister. Hey mnottertroll How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that”

WhoreMods -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 10:09:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: SeekingMnD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened. What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now. Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it. A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it. Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it. She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example) Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger! Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister. Hey mnottertroll How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that” That isn't Ron, you fuckwit. And you know exactly how that feels, Sanitary.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 10:31:10 AM)
quote: Russian communist masters They aren't communist, and never have been.

BoscoX -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 1:17:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: SeekingMnD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened. What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now. Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it. A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it. Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it. She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example) Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger! Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister. Hey mnottertroll How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that” That isn't Ron, you fuckwit. And you know exactly how that feels, Sanitary. Thats your daddy felchgobble He is far too stooped to change up his posting style much Cute how you come running to try to protect his pathetic ass You’ll always be his little whore boy

SeekingMnD -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 1:31:38 PM)
You getting your rightist slobbering howling derangement on again, old geezer?

bounty44 -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 4:04:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Hey mnottertroll How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that” i wont go so far as to say it is him, but I think it sounds like him too. although, this goes a long way towards making the case doesn't it? quote: You getting your rightist slobbering howling derangement on again, old geezer?

Edwird -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/3/2017 4:39:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: playfultom62 So, you are finally kissing up to Donna Brazile. I knew you were like that. No. More amazing, bozo x has a "Feel the Bern" bumper sticker. Or at least the equivalent, on this forum. I knew that boy had it in him, somewhere.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/4/2017 1:47:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker And wow, I hadn't seen this, but it's official: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/22/sanders-keeps-em-guessing-bernie-to-seek-senate-reelection-as-independent-amid-2020-talk.html Wow, what a surprise. Why didn't the DNC want him as their nominee? He's so dedicated! Do you blame him? The DNC and Hillary fucked him over and rigged the Democratic nomination to Hillary. He may not have won the nomination without it being rigged, but he also may have. There's no way to prove it one way or the other. Why does it surprise you that he's not going to play ball with the same group that fucked him over before? Plus, his age may be playing a part in his decision to run or not. If he has his full faculties (and I'm not insinuating he does or doesn't), wouldn't you think that just might be something he's going to wait and see how he ages over the next year or so? Trump was 70 at his inauguration (oldest President at the start of a Presidency ever; Reagan, technically was the oldest person to be inaugurated, being almost 74 at his re-election inauguration). If Bernie wins in 2020, he'll be 79 at his inauguration. Frankly, I'm amazed that people like Bernie and Ron Paul are as active and engaged as they are at their ages (Ron Paul retired at the age of 77, but is still politically active).

Edwird -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/4/2017 2:14:05 AM)
I, too, am somewhat wary of someone who is born just 8 months before Paul McCartney. How effing ancient can you get? That said, I don't know any 70 yr. old who talks like a high-strung 15 yr. old like Trump does, and this is 'what's on the cart,' now. Jeebus. Not exactly the 'voice of authority' that some might wish for. I can tell you this, though; Bernie had almost as many 15-18 yr. old girls all excited a year ago as McCartney did 40 yrs. ago. Just going by my youngest niece's facebook and her friends. Not that that means anything. The rest of us acted all grown-up and voted for the hyena.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/4/2017 2:20:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird I, too, am somewhat wary of someone who is born just 8 months before Paul McCartney. How effing ancient can you get? That said, I don't know any 70 yr. old who talks like a high-strung 15 yr. old like Trump does, and this is 'what's on the cart,' now. Jeebus. Not exactly the 'voice of authority' that some might wish for. I can tell you this, though; Bernie had almost as many 15-18 yr. old girls all excited a year ago as McCartney did 40 yrs. ago. Just going by my niece's facebook and her friends. Not that that means anything. The rest of us acted all grown-up and voted for the hyena. I'm not sure who you're calling a hyena; Hillary or Trump. Either way, I think I acted more all growed ([:D]) up and voted for neither.

Edwird -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/4/2017 2:31:32 AM)
It wasn't the Royal 'we' nor any reference to what you or I voted or didn't vote for. The fact is that we have this pitch-pipe voice for president now, so he got elected by whatever means this land allows. WE live in this country, so I said "we."

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875