RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 7:58:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
Hodor, you seriously do not understand my point or this issue, and I don't want to continue to explain it over and over to someone who looks like the most gruesome B movie mad scientist minion ever, so this will be my last time.


I have to admit I'm honored to be called Hodor, though, he had much more hair than I.

Physical attacks aside, I'm so glad you're going to shut up about this now. I've grown tired of your demonstrating a lack of comprehension.

quote:

Democracy isn't about making sure the candidates are equal.
Democracy is about the majority freely choosing what they believe they want.
THEY WERE STILL FREE TO CHOOSE BERNIE.
THE ELECTIONS THEMSELVES WERE FAIR.
THEY CHOSE HILLARY.
If a candidate fails for whatever reason to connect with voters, then that is their failure, not 'undermining democracy'.
If democracy was about making the candidates equal, then any candidate who raised more money than any other candidate would be 'undermining democracy'.
Any candidate who used a smarter strategy than any other candidate would be 'undermining democracy'.
Any candidate who was better looking would be 'undermining democracy'.
Any candidate who worked harder to get their message out would be 'undermining democracy'.
Any candidate who understood the system and made it work to their advantage would be 'undermining democracy'.
Even I will admit that despite the proven fact that the Russians helped Trump with all the hacking, fake news, etc... it doesn't mean that the actual election wasn't free or fair.
It is up to the voters themselves to make sure they are making informed choices... which is probably why it almost never actually happens in the US.
Still, the right amount of people in the right locations still chose that piece of shit to be president, and now he is the president.
And you keep fucking ignoring the fact that BERNIE WAS OFFERED THE SAME DEAL. Maybe your body is running out of places to put the cellulite and it's backed up inside your brain??
Maybe the stress of having to look in the mirror every morning is taking its toll on your mental health??
You just keep repeating 'it was rigged' without actually thinking about WHY you are saying that.
I am done here.


I know why I'm saying it. I'm saying it for the same reason those on the left are bleating about Russia attempting to rig the election for Trump.

When you make one candidate look better than the other, you're, in effect, tampering with the votes. Rather than Hillary and Bernie running on their own merits, the DNC made damn sure Hillary looked better than Bernie. For instance, passing along the questions to Hillary's campaign for an upcoming primary debate gives one candidate an advantage that should not have been given. Had both campaigns been given the same questions with the same lead time before the debate, there would be no tampering with the democratic vote.

But, I'm sooo glad you're done here.




heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 7:58:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Donna Brazile: 'No evidence' that Democratic primaries were 'rigged'
Former Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile said she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged.


So, the woman who passed Hillary primary questions before the debate with Bernie says there is "'no evidence' that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged."

Please wait a moment while I roll on the floor laughing.


You were more than willing to believe her when she was talking about how it was all so unfair to poor Bernie.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:05:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Donna Brazile: 'No evidence' that Democratic primaries were 'rigged'
Former Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile said she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged.

So, the woman who passed Hillary primary questions before the debate with Bernie says there is "'no evidence' that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged."
Please wait a moment while I roll on the floor laughing.

just passing along further information.. because some people are using false claims again...


Right. Further information, like the questions.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:06:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Donna Brazile: 'No evidence' that Democratic primaries were 'rigged'
Former Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile said she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged.

So, the woman who passed Hillary primary questions before the debate with Bernie says there is "'no evidence' that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged."
Please wait a moment while I roll on the floor laughing.

You were more than willing to believe her when she was talking about how it was all so unfair to poor Bernie.


Actually, the media pointed out it was unfair to Bernie. It was obvious it was unfair to Bernie. The DNC email dump showed it was unfair to Bernie. I didn't just come to this realization. I'm surprised you hadn't heard of it before now.




heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:15:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
When you make one candidate look better than the other, you're, in effect, tampering with the votes.


'In effect' = 'I know I am full of shit, but I'll keep reaching'.

No, actually tampering with the votes is tampering with the votes.
Trying to make one candidate look better than the other one is called 'trying to win an election'.
In a contest, people take whatever advantages they can get.





MasterDrakk -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:21:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Donna Brazile: 'No evidence' that Democratic primaries were 'rigged'
Former Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile said she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged.

So, the woman who passed Hillary primary questions before the debate with Bernie says there is "'no evidence' that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged."
Please wait a moment while I roll on the floor laughing.

You were more than willing to believe her when she was talking about how it was all so unfair to poor Bernie.


Actually, the media pointed out it was unfair to Bernie. It was obvious it was unfair to Bernie. The DNC email dump showed it was unfair to Bernie. I didn't just come to this realization. I'm surprised you hadn't heard of it before now.


We should also point out that it was unfair to Marco Rubio, as well as several others.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:25:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
When you make one candidate look better than the other, you're, in effect, tampering with the votes.

'In effect' = 'I know I am full of shit, but I'll keep reaching'.
No, actually tampering with the votes is tampering with the votes.
Trying to make one candidate look better than the other one is called 'trying to win an election'.
In a contest, people take whatever advantages they can get.


And THAT is not the DNC's job to do. Thank you for demonstrating that the DNC actively participated in trying to get Hillary elected over Bernie.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:27:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk
We should also point out that it was unfair to Marco Rubio, as well as several others.


I could be wrong, but I don't think Marco Rubio was running for the Democratic nomination....




Lucylastic -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:30:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Donna Brazile: 'No evidence' that Democratic primaries were 'rigged'
Former Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile said she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged.

So, the woman who passed Hillary primary questions before the debate with Bernie says there is "'no evidence' that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged."
Please wait a moment while I roll on the floor laughing.

just passing along further information.. because some people are using false claims again...


Right. Further information, like the questions.


call me a liar. I really dont give a shit.
Im so shy and leery of making points and derogatory comments,
The only commentary was

"It seems there is some confusion and certainly not evident of a happy party, but, the facts may not be what they seem....
another wait and see. "


so whatevah




heavyblinker -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 8:33:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
When you make one candidate look better than the other, you're, in effect, tampering with the votes.

'In effect' = 'I know I am full of shit, but I'll keep reaching'.
No, actually tampering with the votes is tampering with the votes.
Trying to make one candidate look better than the other one is called 'trying to win an election'.
In a contest, people take whatever advantages they can get.


And THAT is not the DNC's job to do. Thank you for demonstrating that the DNC actively participated in trying to get Hillary elected over Bernie.


It isn't the DNC's job NOT to do it.
And for the fifth time or so, BERNIE COULD HAVE TAKEN THE SAME DEAL.




MasterDrakk -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 9:18:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk
We should also point out that it was unfair to Marco Rubio, as well as several others.


I could be wrong, but I don't think Marco Rubio was running for the Democratic nomination....



But it has exactly as much to do with it as Bernie, by example, do you think that if Little Marco ran for the Democratic nomination he would do well? Do you think that if Hillary would have run for the Republican nomination she would have done well? Do you remember when out front and with no qualms top RNC hacks were looking to deny Don the nomination? There was no butthurting or snowflaking by rightists then.

Big yawn, and little hands.




Edwird -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 9:50:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Thank goodness somebody saved us from "Hillary 'Goldman Sachs' Clinton," God Bless America.


Hillary was also beholden to Wall Street. Of the two main candidates, both are slaves to it.


This, from the political genius who tried to tell us that anybody voting for Jill Stein actually wanted Trump for president. Too funny.

As for Trump, "we" are alleged to have been voting for "change!" right?

Well, sure enough, I don't think any of those 6 Goldman Sachs guys had been appointed before.

"Change!"

OTOH, one could say that having our current "voice of authority" acting, and even more, sounding like a strung-out 14 yr. old boy is certainly 'change.'

Like pennies accidentally dropped to the pavement when paying for drive-through coffee. Spare change. Sparse neurons. Etc.




servantforuse -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 4:26:39 PM)

You have your candidates mixed up. Hope and change was Obama. Trump is making America great again.




MasterDrakk -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 4:30:52 PM)

neither one accomplishing their goal, and the current one failing spectacularly and driving it backwards.




bounty44 -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 4:48:42 PM)

how incredibly ironic you've just shown up here, yet are able to proclaim pretty much everything the right has said as "factless propaganda" and then you make a such meaningless partisan hack statement that cannot be supported with anything close to a "fact."

still curious---mnottertroll or not?








servantforuse -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 4:49:54 PM)

Trump has been in office 9 months. Just wait. Thousands of jobs coming back 'on shore'. Foxconn coming to WI. Maybe Qualcomm will be next to " Make America Home Again".




MasterDrakk -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 4:51:48 PM)

how very curious that since you have been out here in every post you have parroted factless propaganda from townhall and other factless propaganda sites.

still curious---any intelligence whatoever or not?




bounty44 -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 4:58:42 PM)

your unsupportable and therefore idiotic statement aside, the more you post, the more convinced I am youre mnottertroll...




DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 5:13:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Donna Brazile: 'No evidence' that Democratic primaries were 'rigged'
Former Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile said she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged.

So, the woman who passed Hillary primary questions before the debate with Bernie says there is "'no evidence' that the 2016 Democratic primary for the presidential nomination was rigged."
Please wait a moment while I roll on the floor laughing.

just passing along further information.. because some people are using false claims again...

Right. Further information, like the questions.

call me a liar. I really dont give a shit.
Im so shy and leery of making points and derogatory comments,
The only commentary was
"It seems there is some confusion and certainly not evident of a happy party, but, the facts may not be what they seem....
another wait and see. "
so whatevah


My mistake. I took your comment about "passing along further information" as an explanation of what Donna Brazile was doing. I apologize for my error.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Donna Brazille: "What REALLY Happened" (11/6/2017 5:19:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
When you make one candidate look better than the other, you're, in effect, tampering with the votes.

'In effect' = 'I know I am full of shit, but I'll keep reaching'.
No, actually tampering with the votes is tampering with the votes.
Trying to make one candidate look better than the other one is called 'trying to win an election'.
In a contest, people take whatever advantages they can get.

And THAT is not the DNC's job to do. Thank you for demonstrating that the DNC actively participated in trying to get Hillary elected over Bernie.

It isn't the DNC's job NOT to do it.
And for the fifth time or so, BERNIE COULD HAVE TAKEN THE SAME DEAL.


It's not the DNC's job to make one candidate look better than another candidate for the Democratic nomination. It IS the DNC's job to help make the DNC's nominated candidate look better than the GOP candidate. But, that's not what happened.

Hillary paying for the DNC's support (and Bernie not paying for that support) only means the DNC is corrupt. It doesn't mean it was fair.

And here I thought you said you were done with this.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875